Re: [libreoffice-l10n] OOo goes to Apache Foundation

2011-06-03 Thread Mike Dupont
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:19 AM, toki wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 02/06/2011 12:29, Mike Dupont wrote: > >> This means that changes can be cherry picked out and included in >> libreoffice, no? > > What changes? I mean that libreoffice can take from the openoffic

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] OOo goes to Apache Foundation

2011-06-03 Thread Rimas Kudelis
2011.06.03 18:52, toki rašė: On 03/06/2011 06:30, Rimas Kudelis wrote: What for? IANAL, but as far as I understand, Apache license allows *us* to use OOo's code, perhaps even relicensing it under LGPL/MPL. My point is that there will _not_ be any source code to use. From the text I quoted in

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] OOo goes to Apache Foundation

2011-06-03 Thread toki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/06/2011 06:30, Rimas Kudelis wrote: > What for? IANAL, but as far as I understand, Apache license allows *us* to use OOo's code, perhaps even relicensing it under LGPL/MPL. My point is that there will _not_ be any source code to use. jonathon -

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] OOo goes to Apache Foundation

2011-06-03 Thread toki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/06/2011 05:26, andré b wrote: > AGPL is a stricter version of GPL. It adds restrictions on Internet > interactions. AGPL preserves the freedoms that GPL doesn't. > LGPL now means _Lesser_ General Public License. I know what it means,. I als

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] OOo goes to Apache Foundation

2011-06-02 Thread Rimas Kudelis
2011.06.03 06:19, toki rašė: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/06/2011 12:29, Mike Dupont wrote: This means that changes can be cherry picked out and included in libreoffice, no? What changes? Under the new OOo license there is no requirement for source code to be availabl

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] OOo goes to Apache Foundation

2011-06-02 Thread andré b
toki a écrit : -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/06/2011 12:29, Mike Dupont wrote: This means that changes can be cherry picked out and included in libreoffice, no? What changes? Under the new OOo license there is no requirement for source code to be available, much less

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] OOo goes to Apache Foundation

2011-06-02 Thread toki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/06/2011 12:29, Mike Dupont wrote: > This means that changes can be cherry picked out and included in libreoffice, > no? What changes? Under the new OOo license there is no requirement for source code to be available, much less sent up stream.

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] OOo goes to Apache Foundation

2011-06-02 Thread Mike Dupont
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Andras Timar wrote: > Apache Foundation requires Apache License which is not a copyleft license. > It allows use of the source code – and my translations, too – for the > development of proprietary software. This means that changes can be cherry picked out and inc

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] OOo goes to Apache Foundation

2011-06-01 Thread Anton Meixome
Hi Andras, I understand your position. I think that the Oracle movement means they want put code out of GPL for a hipotetical future developpement (propietary, of course). This and too that they perhaps want split the developpers community atracting corporative interest to an OOo supported by Apac

[libreoffice-l10n] OOo goes to Apache Foundation

2011-06-01 Thread Andras Timar
Hi, Probably you've read the news, OOo code and trademarks were given to Apache Foundation. For details start reading here: http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2011/06/01/statement-about-oracles-move-to-donate-openoffice-org-assets-to-the-apache-foundation/ and here: http://www.gnome.org/~michael/b