Re: [libreoffice-l10n] New language request: PDT "Plautdietsch"

2017-12-05 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Mario, On Monday, 2017-12-04 21:09:10 -0300, Mario L. Epp - PDT-Dev wrote: > > For reference, this is https://www.ethnologue.com/language/pdt > > > > As the main default locale I'll add pdt-CA > > Thank you for clarifying that point. I can live with that locale. Though > a better default loc

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] New language request: PDT "Plautdietsch"

2017-12-04 Thread Mario L. Epp - PDT-Dev
While adding locales, we might as well include pdt-MX, pdt-BZ and pdt-BO where many speakers have dificulty communicating in either Spanish or English. Besides pdt-CA, pdt-US and pdt-PY also have significant populations of Plautdietsch speakers. Then we might as well also add pdt-DE. Since they ar

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] New language request: PDT "Plautdietsch"

2017-12-04 Thread toki
On 12/04/2017 06:48 PM, Eike Rathke wrote: > As the main default locale I'll add pdt-CA How about including pdt-US, and pdt-MX? My perception is that the language is used as much, if not more in the US, and Mexico, as it is in Canada. ### At some point the UI is going to have to be redesigned, b

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] New language request: PDT "Plautdietsch"

2017-12-04 Thread Mario L. Epp - PDT-Dev
Thank you Eike, On 12/04/2017 03:48 PM, Eike Rathke wrote: > For reference, this is https://www.ethnologue.com/language/pdt Unfortunately some of that information is out-of-date. But thank you anyway. I will ask members of our team to provide updates and corrections. >> The language codes as sp

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] New language request: PDT "Plautdietsch"

2017-12-04 Thread Sophie
Hi Eike, Le 04/12/2017 à 19:56, Eike Rathke a écrit : > Hi Sophie, > > On Monday, 2017-12-04 09:50:36 +0100, Sophie Gautier wrote: > >> @Eike, do you want Mario to open an issue on BZ with the details? > > I'll now just add the language to the listbox. That was my take :) thanks a lot for your

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] New language request: PDT "Plautdietsch"

2017-12-04 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Sophie, On Monday, 2017-12-04 09:50:36 +0100, Sophie Gautier wrote: > @Eike, do you want Mario to open an issue on BZ with the details? I'll now just add the language to the listbox. Eike -- LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. GPG key 0x6A6CD5B76

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] New language request: PDT "Plautdietsch"

2017-12-04 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Mario, On Saturday, 2017-12-02 01:17:01 -0300, Mario L. Epp wrote: > I would like to request the inclusion of a new language in LibreOffice. > > ISO 639-3: pdt - Plautdietsch. A variant of Low German, though very much > distinct and different from the ISO 639-3 "nds". For reference, this is

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] New language request: PDT "Plautdietsch"

2017-12-04 Thread Sophie
Hi Mario, Welcome to our team! I'm adding Eike in copy of this mail, he will be able to help you to have the language included. @Eike, do you want Mario to open an issue on BZ with the details? Cheers Sophie Le 02/12/2017 à 05:17, Mario L. Epp a écrit : > I would like to request the inclusion of a

[libreoffice-l10n] New language request: PDT "Plautdietsch"

2017-12-01 Thread Mario L. Epp
I would like to request the inclusion of a new language in LibreOffice. ISO 639-3: pdt - Plautdietsch. A variant of Low German, though very much distinct and different from the ISO 639-3 "nds". The language codes as specified by BCP 47 would be: -> pdt-019 (the main user community) -> pdt-150 (a

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] New language request

2015-12-13 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Michael Bauer wrote: > I see no reason to turn this down. LO should not be the arbiter over > language vs dialect debates and we have never to date intervened saying "you > must produce a standard first". Breton I'm sure was a come-first deal and > nobody asked if it was Gwened, KLT, Peurunvan, Fal

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] New language request

2015-12-13 Thread msch
Thank you for your support. My account name is Matumaros. On 13 December 2015 15:10:54 +01:00, Michael Bauer wrote: > I see no reason to turn this down. LO should not be the arbiter over language > vs dialect debates and we have never to date intervened saying "you must > produce a standard fi

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] New language request

2015-12-13 Thread Michael Bauer
I see no reason to turn this down. LO should not be the arbiter over language vs dialect debates and we have never to date intervened saying "you must produce a standard first". Breton I'm sure was a come-first deal and nobody asked if it was Gwened, KLT, Peurunvan, Falc'huneg (L or Gw) or Etre

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] New language request

2015-12-13 Thread msch
Hi again, I'm sorry to reply so late, work is demanding a lot before Christmas from me. I agree that it is not very professional to have no Impressum on my page. Sadly I don't have enough time right now to do it because of my work. I will finish it as soon as I can though. I wrote on the Bavarian

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] New language request

2015-12-08 Thread toki
On 08/12/2015 19:01, Jānis wrote: > for the very beginning I'd suggest to stop at spell checker for a few years For languages that utilize evidential grammar, the grammar checker is far more important than the spell checker. Likewise, for languages that make extensive use of noun classes, gramma

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] New language request

2015-12-08 Thread Jānis
Citēts toki Tue, 8 Dec 2015 18:16:56 +: On 08/12/2015 14:23, Greater Worcester Land Trust wrote: I read in the FAQ that you post here to request a new language effort. I am looking to start work on a Nipmuck localization. Let's start at the very beginning. How well does LibO _currentl

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] New language request

2015-12-08 Thread Rimas Kudelis
Hi, 2015-12-08 18:37, Sophie wrote: > I agree with Christian here, LibreOffice is a very huge project, you > will have a lot of concepts to define to create the right translation > and a very long work on the glossary before beginning. If you really > want to do localization, then try to find a li

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] New language request

2015-12-08 Thread toki
On 08/12/2015 14:23, Greater Worcester Land Trust wrote: > I read in the FAQ that you post here to request a new language effort. > I am looking to start work on a Nipmuck localization. Let's start at the very beginning. How well does LibO _currently_ support Nipmuck?: * Is Locale data for Nipmu

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] New language request

2015-12-08 Thread Jānis
it is not extinct - there are aroun 1,5 th Nipmucans. While they speak their tongue and keep it living, it is not extinct. Is the same kind of question like - is the augštaičiai extinct? Janis Citēts Rimas Kudelis Tue, 8 Dec 2015 16:55:27 +0200: Hi Colin, 2015-12-08 16:23, Greater Worcest

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] New language request

2015-12-08 Thread Sophie
Hi, Le 08/12/2015 17:06, Christian Lohmaier a écrit : > Hi *, > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Greater Worcester Land Trust > wrote: >> Hello list, >> I read in the FAQ that you post here to request a new language effort. >> I am looking to start work on a Nipmuck localization. > > I share th

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] New language request

2015-12-08 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Greater Worcester Land Trust wrote: > Hello list, > I read in the FAQ that you post here to request a new language effort. > I am looking to start work on a Nipmuck localization. I share the same reservations as with Bavarian - here probably even little more

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] New language request

2015-12-08 Thread Rimas Kudelis
Hi Colin, 2015-12-08 16:23, Greater Worcester Land Trust wrote: > Hello list, > I read in the FAQ that you post here to request a new language effort. > I am looking to start work on a Nipmuck localization. > > I have two conundrums: > 1. I have no idea if anyone is even seeing this post, and > 2.

[libreoffice-l10n] New language request

2015-12-08 Thread Greater Worcester Land Trust
Hello list, I read in the FAQ that you post here to request a new language effort. I am looking to start work on a Nipmuck localization. I have two conundrums: 1. I have no idea if anyone is even seeing this post, and 2. If this really is still the way to initiate a new localization. Any help on