I did experience the same. I standard KR2S cannot be trimmed.
It will keep the trim speed for a maximum of 30 seconds before it will climb
or descend and not return to the trim speed
Cheers
Christian
OE-VPD
-
My friend Aube Coote ( Retired Flying Instruc
At 07:51 PM 7/16/04 +1000, you wrote:
>I did experience the same. I standard KR2S cannot be trimmed.
>It will keep the trim speed for a maximum of 30 seconds before it will climb
>or descend and not return to the trim speed
>Christian
>-
>My friend Aube C
larry flesner wrote:
> ...the stability charactistics of the KR. That is
> all determined by airfoil shape and angle, distance between wing
> and tail surfaces, size of the flying surfaces, etc.
You forgot CG location. When comparing notes on stability, it is
critical to know the CG position.
K
At 03:22 PM 7/16/04 -0700, you wrote:
>larry flesner wrote:
>> ...the stability charactistics of the KR. That is
>> all determined by airfoil shape and angle, distance between wing
>> and tail surfaces, size of the flying surfaces, etc.
>---
>You forgot CG location. When co
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:07:24 -0500 larry flesner
writes:
> At 03:22 PM 7/16/04 -0700, you wrote:
> >larry flesner wrote:
> >> ...the stability charactistics of the KR. That is
> >> all determined by airfoil shape and angle, distance between wing
> >> and tail surfaces, size of the flying surface
Jeff,
I would be interested to know what, if any, modifications your KR has that
might be responsible for its better than average stability? Is it a KR2 or
2S? Where was your CG vs the aft face of the forward spar (or some other
reference) during the recent "hands off" stability check?
Thanks,
Ken,
There's nothing special about my KR. See the 2002 gathering photos for
pictures of it.
It's a -2S that was started before there were -2S plans. Consequently,
it is really a stock -2 with a 14" stretch in the fuselage and a
streamlined canopy.. The only thing significantly different is tha
Excellent results. Gives me hope for mine. Not that
I really need hands off capability, but it's nice to
have.
Ray
--- jscott.pi...@juno.com wrote:
>
> On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:07:24 -0500 larry flesner
>
> writes:
> > At 03:22 PM 7/16/04 -0700, you wrote:
> > >larry flesner wrote:
> > >> ...
rom: krnet-bounces+christian.kogelmann=aua@mylist.net
[mailto:krnet-bounces+christian.kogelmann=aua@mylist.net]On Behalf
Of Kenneth B. Jones
Sent: Sonntag, 18. Juli 2004 02:10
To: KRnet
Subject: Re: KR> stability challenge
Jeff,
I would be interested to know what, if any, modification
>
>I am hoping that the KR-2 will fly as sensitive as the DR-300. Alhtough I
>indeed had to keep my hand at the stick at all times, it was a pleasure to
>fly. Very easy, very responsive, and I am looking forward to get something
>similar once I am done.
>Wolfgang+
++
o:krnet-bounces+christian.kogelmann=aua@mylist.net]On Behalf
Of larry flesner
Sent: Sonntag, 11. Juli 2004 02:49
To: KRnet
Subject: KR> stability challenge
>
>I am hoping that the KR-2 will fly as sensitive as the DR-300. Alhtough I
>indeed had to keep my hand at the stick at all times
11 matches
Mail list logo
