R R says; DO NOT lengthen the center spars! If you are an
engineer and do the numbers, you are now an aircraft designer, Virg
( or should be! )
On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 23:51:20 -0400 "Randy Powell"
writes:
> What would be the pro and con of extending the center section spars
> and reducing
Randy Powell wrote:
> What would be the pro and con of extending the center section spars and
reducing the outer wing panel length an equal amount on a Kr2s. This would
give room for larger wing tanks in the stub area and added width for flaps.
Lengthening the center spars would REDUCE the load
time for building and a time for FLYING and the time for building
is OVER.
Daniel R. Heath - Lexington, SC
---Original Message---
From: VIRGIL N SALISBURY
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: 08/05/06 08:29:20
To: kr...@mylist.net
Subject: Re: KR> center spars and wing tanks
R R s
el R. Heath - Lexington, SC
> ---Original Message---
>
> From: VIRGIL N SALISBURY
> Date: 08/05/06 08:29:20
> To: kr...@mylist.net
> Subject: Re: KR> center spars and wing tanks
>
> R R says; DO NOT lengthen the center spars! If you are an
> __
At 08:02 AM 8/5/2006, you wrote:
>It should also be mentioned that carrying fuel in the outer wings is
>practically a free lunch for the WAFs, unless you tend to land really hard.
>But I like mine in the stub wings, so there are no fuel connections when
>disconnecting the wings, but then that's not
Moving the WAFs further outboard would also decrease the amount of dihedral.
This would affect roll stability wouldn't it?
John Bavington.
On 8/6/06, Larry&Sallie Flesner wrote:
>
> At 08:02 AM 8/5/2006, you wrote:
> >It should also be mentioned that carrying fuel in the outer wings is
> >practi
wings in
the event of a crash.
Randy Powell
randywpow...@verizon.net
- Original Message -
From: "Bavo"
To: "KRnet"
Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2006 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: KR> center spars and wing tanks
> Moving the WAFs further outboard would also decrease the amo
That depends on how much dihedral you give the wings when you build them.
The Jodel's dihedral starts a fair way out as well.
Peter Bancks.
---Original Message---
From: Bavo
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: 08/07/06 08:14:24
To: KRnet
Subject: Re: KR> center spars and wi
.
StRaNgEdAyS wrote:
That depends on how much dihedral you give the wings when you build them.
The Jodel's dihedral starts a fair way out as well.
Peter Bancks.
---Original Message---
From: Bavo
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: 08/07/06 08:14:24
To: KRnet
Subject: Re: KR> center s
You have a point.
- Original Message -
From: "Larry H."
To: "KRnet"
Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2006 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: KR> center spars and wing tanks
> If you ever wanted to place your plane in an enclosed trailer for hauling
> or storage, you would
hat depends on how much dihedral you give the wings when you build them.
> The Jodel's dihedral starts a fair way out as well.
> Peter Bancks.
>
> ---Original Message---
>
> From: Bavo
> Date: 08/07/06 08:14:24
> To: KRnet
> Subject: Re: KR> center spars and
: KRnet
cc :(ccc : Serge VIDAL/DNSA/SAGEM)
Objet : Re: KR> center spars and wing tanks
If you ever wanted to place your plane in an enclosed trailer for hauling
or storage, you would be disappointed to find that the longer spar
prevented it from fitting in. You never know
What would be the pro and con of extending the center section spars and
reducing the outer wing panel length an equal amount on a Kr2s. This would
give room for larger wing tanks in the stub area and added width for flaps.
Randy Powell
randywpow...@verizon.net
Netters:
Would this have a negative impact on Roll Stability? Would tanks in the wing
stubs force a major mod of control cable routing?
Don
Randy Powell wrote:
> What would be the pro and con of extending the center s
14 matches
Mail list logo
