>
>Sounds like your DAR doesn't know what he is talking about. If that were
the
>case, all of the experimental aircraft that were built and then sold to
>someone else, the new owner could never work of it unless he was an A&P.
>Chris Theroux
++
In a message dated 1/16/2005 5:05:54 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
fles...@midwest.net writes:
I would advise you not to try to "sneak anything through" on the
Fed's. One of the employees of the local FSDO shared with
me a story of someone trying that and they were going to
throw the book at
At 06:54 PM 1/16/2005, you wrote:
>Group,
>
>I have had an unpleasant conversation with my local DAR. He stated that
>once an amateur plane is registered, that builder is the only person that
>can have the repairman's certificate for that plane.
It is a correct statement that one experimental ca
on't take my word.
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 7:08 PM
Subject: Re: KR> bad news from the DAR
> In a message dated 1/16/2005 5:05:54 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> fles...@midwest.net writes:
>
>
> I would advise you not to try to "sne
Lee,
I found this at:
http://www.aircraftersllc.com/51percent.htm
Documentation is Important:
The Amateur Builder(s) must be able to show that they have performed at
least 60 of the 119 operations (in the case of a fixed-wing aircraft) in
order to qualify for the repairman certificate, and to
Bad news from the DAR
If your Dad has already registered the aircraft,then he has already proved
to the FAA that he done atleast 51% of the work.So adding everyone else's
work up as yours is not going to work.You need to find a A&P that you trust
and will sign it off every year for you.You don't
RE: If your Dad has already registered the aircraft,then he has already
proved to the FAA that he done at least 51% of the work
I believe that there may be some confusion about Registration and
Certification as it applies to this issue. I do believe that the regs talk
about this issue in terms of
The problem I'm having is The local DAR closest to me don't want to
>inspect my plane when I'm done..So why is he a DAR?Bob
>_
Many of the DAR's now days are independent "licensed contractors" so
to speak and are not fede
Only thing I can come up with would be to unregister. Tear down update to
new airfoil front and back, stretch and register again. Theoretically at
least this would have to get you back in the 51% range again.
Doug Rupert
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Ver
>I have had an unpleasant conversation with my local DAR. He stated that
>once an amateur plane is registered, that builder is the only person that
>can have the repairman's certificate for that plane.
A plane can be registered the day the plans are bought. Stupid, because
then the taxes start
In a message dated 1/17/2005 2:53:10 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
da...@alltel.net writes:
I believe that there may be some confusion about Registration and
Certification as it applies to this issue.
I remember right when Lee came over to my house to talk KR's, he said that
the aircraft ha
ign ;o)
-Original Message-
From: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net] On
Behalf Of larry severson
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 11:13 AM
To: KRnet
Subject: Re: KR> bad news from the DAR
>I have had an unpleasant conversation with my local DAR. He stated tha
Group,
I have had an unpleasant conversation with my local DAR. He stated that once an
amateur plane is registered, that builder is the only person that can have the
repairman's certificate for that plane. He words. He suggested that I contact
Oklahoma to see if the N # on the plane is still ac
In a message dated 1/16/2005 3:55:23 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
l...@vandyke5.com writes:
I have had an unpleasant conversation with my local DAR
Sounds like your DAR doesn't know what he is talking about. If that were the
case, all of the experimental aircraft that were built and then
uot;condition" inspection. It
doesn't hurt to have an extra set of eyes look at it once a year anyway.
Ken Jones, kenbjo...@cinci.rr.com
Sharonville, OH
N5834, aka The Porkopolis Flying Pig
- Original Message -
From: "Lee Van Dyke"
To: "KRnet"
Sent: Sun
15 matches
Mail list logo
