Congratulations on unscrewing the inscrutable!
___
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_l
Well that only took 7 months.
Now we wait on the weather...
Colin.
Subject: RE: 127条について
127条の申請について、新潟〜岡南の区間は下記のとおり許可
しましたので、お知らせします。
許可日(approval date):2017.7.5
許可番号(approval number):国空国第1551号 RJSN〜RJBK
鹿児島空港及び那覇空港との調整が完了しましたら、お知らせ下さい。
Dear Captain Colin
Very cool
--
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 8:54 AM PDT ol' weirdo via KRnet wrote:
>I have EVERY Kitplanes. I will go through them and scan the KR article.
>When my grandson comes this weekend I will have him make them into a
>package and send it to the group
I have EVERY Kitplanes. I will go through them and scan the KR article.
When my grandson comes this weekend I will have him make them into a
package and send it to the group.
Bill Weir
Chris Prata wrote:
> Are all/some of these articles available someplace
See http://aerofoilengineering.com/KR/sportaviation/kr_SA.htm for most
of these articles. Thanks to Don Reid for providing these many years
ago. He's now an aerodynamacist, in addition to being a nuclear
engineer.
more specific
questions you want to
ask, I'd be happy to do more summarizing.
> Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 15:44:41 -0700
> To: laser147 at juno.com; krnet at list.krnet.org
> Subject: Re: KR> KR Article
> From: krnet at list.krnet.org
>
>
>
> So not much !
>
So not much !
--
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 2:56 PM PDT Mike Stirewalt via KRnet wrote:
>Sparky let me go through his library of KR magazine articles a few years
>ago and I scanned them all. The KR has been written about a lot over the
>years. This is by no means a com
Sparky let me go through his library of KR magazine articles a few years
ago and I scanned them all. The KR has been written about a lot over the
years. This is by no means a comprehensive list.
Probably the best and most current coverage of the KR is the Sport
Aviation issue of December 2006.
. My experience so far has been write it and they will
come.
Original Message
Subject: Re: KR> KR article
From: Mark Langford via KRnet
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: Fri, March 27, 2015 9:22 am
To: "KRnet"
It's worth pointing out that conventional wi
I got a nice email back from Paul Dye inviting me to send him something
more along the lines of how to make building easier, what doesn't work,
which mods make the most sense, and making it a more efficient
plane...that sort of thing. He likes to leave flight reports up to
people with no "dog
KRnet
Date:03/27/2015 11:22 AM (GMT-06:00)
To: KRnet Subject: Re: KR> KR
article
It's worth pointing out that conventional wisdom has been that plans-built
airplanes, along with "minimally" supported kitplanes, do not earn Kitplanes
a lot of advertising revenue (if ANY
It's worth pointing out that conventional wisdom has been that plans-built
airplanes, along with "minimally" supported kitplanes, do not earn Kitplanes
a lot of advertising revenue (if ANY at this point), so there is not a huge
incentive on their part to devote copy space to it. At the very least
If the article points people toward krnet.org in order to follow up on
their interest, then I think the article has served a major purpose.
Chris
On 3/27/2015 10:22 AM, Mark Langford via KRnet wrote:
> It's worth pointing out that conventional wisdom has been that plans-built
> airplanes, along
Did you ever think that someone would write an article and include a
controversial item just to see how many were reading and would pop
up and defend an opposite view, Virg
http://autospeed.com/cms/A_111051/article.html
Paul Smith
Brisbane, AUSTRALIA
pk.sm...@bigpond.net.au
http://kr2spacemodulator.blogspot.com/
I just saw this from a link on Wicks site. This is a small excerpt from
that article.
We have been there, Wick notes. We have walked in the shoes of our
customers. This company started as a hobby we started by building an
airplane.
That plane was a Ken Rand KR-2, built over the course of t
16 matches
Mail list logo