Re: KR> KR2 Manual Excerpt

2020-09-22 Thread Flesner via KRnet
On 9/22/2020 4:01 PM, Mark Langford via KRnet wrote: There are lots of ways to do this, and room for error in all of them. We all have our favorites ++ One concern in this discussion was "negative" numbers when using the

Re: KR> KR2 Manual Excerpt

2020-09-22 Thread Mark Langford via KRnet
I did plumb bobs and the angle, and could find no discernable error between the measurements. If the plane's not level, no method is going to be accurate, plumb bobs included. There are lots of ways to do this, and room for error in all of them. We all have our favorites, so I'll just stick w

Re: KR> KR2 Manual Excerpt

2020-09-22 Thread Flesner via KRnet
On 9/22/2020 3:31 PM, Flesner via KRnet wrote: The example below ( if it comes through) shows how the big guys do it. Fuselage station "0" is not even located on the fuselage. I was afraid that

Re: KR> KR2 Manual Excerpt

2020-09-22 Thread Flesner via KRnet
On 9/22/2020 1:08 PM, Mark Langford via KRnet wrote: I'm not sure there's any real reduction in error possibiliy here, and the main problem I see is that you're trying to measure with accuracy to a point that you can't hang a tape measure on. +

Re: KR> KR2 Manual Excerpt

2020-09-22 Thread Chris Kinnaman via KRnet
In Kevin's case he needs a datum to establish engine mount length, therefore his prop flange location is an unknown. Easier to use firewall, LE, whatever is already there at this point. Reading the replies got me thinking - Larry, or anybody else, is your engine mounted with the thrustline rig

Re: KR> KR2 Manual Excerpt

2020-09-22 Thread John Bouyea via KRnet
I KNEW this was going to start a topic discussion bearing on the likes of nose wheel or tail wheel! Here's my objection to using a prop flange or any other non-airframe structural element; what happens when you CHANGE the whatever-it-is? Make the engine mount longer, change your prop flange, use a

Re: KR> KR2 Manual Excerpt

2020-09-22 Thread Mark Langford via KRnet
Larry Flesner wrote: >> I would suggest some distance from the main gear contact point (the axle) out ahead of any point of the aircraft. That makes all numbers positive. << I'm not sure there's any real reduction in error possibiliy here, and the main problem I see is that you're trying to

Re: KR> Engine mounts

2020-09-22 Thread Kevin Stolhammer via KRnet
> > Thanks to all for sharing W&B experience and spreadsheets, and > advice/opinions. Heading to the shop now, I'll post my experience in a few > days... > Kevin ___ Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/. Please

Re: KR> KR2 Manual Excerpt

2020-09-22 Thread Flesner via KRnet
On 9/21/2020 8:04 PM, Jeff Scott via KRnet wrote: However, it has become more common now days to project a point some fixed distance forward from a fixed point on the aircraft. For example, the datum might be 6' forward of the bottom of the front of the firewall. +++