On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 04:33:18PM -0600, Richard Laager wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 21:41 +0100, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > My concern is about the fact the JEP/XEP is focused on Jabber and Instant
> > messaging, while it could be usefull in other place (mail client, web
> > forum, ...)
> > -
On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 21:41 +0100, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> My concern is about the fact the JEP/XEP is focused on Jabber and Instant
> messaging, while it could be usefull in other place (mail client, web
> forum, ...)
> - The name "JISP" (Jabber Icon Style Package) is bad.
Perhaps we can get t
On Saturday 04 November 2006 10:03, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> So if we want to standardize the Kopete format, we need to add many
> addition to it, which is not required if we just use the XEP one.
> I have not seen real technical issue with this format.
I haven't read the XEP closely enough to ju
Le samedi 4 novembre 2006 03:01, Martijn Klingens a écrit :
> On Saturday 04 November 2006 00:31, Matt Rogers wrote:
> > Personally, I think we should abandon the use of the XEP as the basis for
> > our common format. I see no reason to discontinue support for the XEP,
> > but as pointed out, there
On Saturday 04 November 2006 00:31, Matt Rogers wrote:
> Personally, I think we should abandon the use of the XEP as the basis for
> our common format. I see no reason to discontinue support for the XEP, but
> as pointed out, there are other people using the current Kopete emoticon
> specification,
On Friday 03 November 2006 14:41, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> Le vendredi 3 novembre 2006 20:38, Richard Laager a écrit :
> > Here are the things I'd like to see addressed:
> >
> > 1. The abuse of xml:lang for protocols is unacceptably horrible. That
> > attribute, as its prefix indicates, is from the
Le vendredi 3 novembre 2006 20:38, Richard Laager a écrit :
> Here are the things I'd like to see addressed:
>
> 1. The abuse of xml:lang for protocols is unacceptably horrible. That
> attribute, as its prefix indicates, is from the XML namespace and nobody
> should be adding values except the XML
On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 10:53 +0100, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> My opinion is that we should continue on the Jabber format (XEP-0038), which
> is already implemented by several client. Technically, this format looks good
> to me. What i don't like is the fact it is too related to jabber (it's name,
On Friday 03 November 2006 10:31, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> I personally think that theses item are not related to emoticon in any
> case, and should not go into the emoticon theme.
>
> maybe some default item for the text-replace plugins, or for another plugin
>
> Note that for some protocol that d
Le jeudi 2 novembre 2006 04:17, Matt Rogers a écrit :
> This link:
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1491133&group_id=2
>35&atid=300235
>
> points to a patch submitted to gaim's patch tracker to add support for
> xml-based emoticon themes.
Hey, good to know that Gaim is no
Le jeudi 2 novembre 2006 11:05, Martijn Klingens a écrit :
> Also, a long-standing wish that I eventually wanted to implement in Kopete
> back when I was still working on it was to allow the engine to do more
> sophisticated markup as well, like changing *bold* to bold
> and /italic/ to italic, or
On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 18:45 +0100, Martijn Klingens wrote:
> > 2) The XML smiley theme would allow us to have mouse-over descriptions
> > for smileys.
>
> I wonder what XML has to do with that though, probably specific for Gaim's
> implementation?
Yeah, our current implementation isn't very exte
Richard, thanks for chiming in!
Note though that you replied to a mail from me, and while I probably still
have some credit due to past Kopete work, I am no longer a Kopete developer
anymore because of lack of time. In other words: I'm not necessarily voicing
the opinion of the Kopete developer
For those of you that don't know me, I'm the Gaim developer to whom the
Gaim XML smiley theme patch is assigned. I brought the proposal of a
unified smiley theme to #kopete some time ago. I finally got around to
following up with mattr again (sorry, been a busy summer at work!), and
here we are. :)
On Thursday 02 November 2006 14:29, Matt Rogers wrote:
> > Is it possible that e.g. : ) in MSN yields another image than in ICQ?
>
> People will want this, so that they can make their emoticons per protocol
> look like the ones from the original clients.
Thinking about this more, in case of confli
On Thursday 02 November 2006 04:05, Martijn Klingens wrote:
> On Thursday 02 November 2006 04:17, Matt Rogers wrote:
> > My personal opinion is to remove the protocol element and add a protocol
> > attribute to both the string and image elements to do per-protocol
> > emoticons.
>
> How are per-pro
On Thursday 02 November 2006 04:17, Matt Rogers wrote:
> My personal opinion is to remove the protocol element and add a protocol
> attribute to both the string and image elements to do per-protocol
> emoticons.
How are per-proto emoticons implemented?
Is it possible that e.g. : ) in MSN yields a
17 matches
Mail list logo
