On Thursday 02 November 2006 04:05, Martijn Klingens wrote: > On Thursday 02 November 2006 04:17, Matt Rogers wrote: > > My personal opinion is to remove the protocol element and add a protocol > > attribute to both the string and image elements to do per-protocol > > emoticons. > > How are per-proto emoticons implemented? > > Is it possible that e.g. : ) in MSN yields another image than in ICQ? >
People will want this, so that they can make their emoticons per protocol look like the ones from the original clients. > Or is it just that the ascii devilish grin } : - > in MSN should be coded > as ( 6 ) ? > People will want this too, well, at least I do. :) > If the latter then you only need the attribute per-string and not > per-proto. > > I do agree to make proto an attr rather than element though. Or rather, > without having read the gaim-devel mailing list for the reasoning behind > it, fail to see why that should be necessary ;-) > IIUC, the patch on the tracker is just a proposal. While i'm sure that some discussion on gaim-devel took place, I don't read gaim-devel (i'm on enough MLs) so I am not aware of what they discussed > Also, a long-standing wish that I eventually wanted to implement in Kopete > back when I was still working on it was to allow the engine to do more > sophisticated markup as well, like changing *bold* to <b>bold</b> > and /italic/ to <i>italic</i>, or even to support '/me' again. > > If we make the icon spec a shared standard (yes please! :) ) we have to > keep in mind any ideas like that. Either we decide to handle those outside > the .xml, we decide to not implement them at all, or we need to provide the > necessary hooks for extensibility. I like the idea of hooks better, personally. Thanks -- Matt _______________________________________________ kopete-devel mailing list kopete-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
