On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 04:33:18PM -0600, Richard Laager wrote: > On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 21:41 +0100, Olivier Goffart wrote: > > My concern is about the fact the JEP/XEP is focused on Jabber and Instant > > messaging, while it could be usefull in other place (mail client, web > > forum, ...) > > - The name "JISP" (Jabber Icon Style Package) is bad. > > Perhaps we can get this changed. > > > - This should not be a XEP in the first place. freedesktop could maybe be > > a > > better place to host the format specification. All implementation details > > related to Jabber clients could anyway be a part of a "good-practice" XEP > > Even if it should be hosted at freedesktop.org, it's a good base. If > nothing else, we can start with that text and edit from there. > > > Anyway, since many client already implement it, we should try to keep a > > compatibility as much as possible. > > This seems like a compelling argument in favor. > > Matt, do you have other specific objections to the format in that XEP? > > I'd like to come up with a list of things to change, and then take it to > standards-jig and go from there. > > Taking into account previous comments here, I have this list: > > 1. Replace the "abuse" of xml:lang with a real protocol attribute. > > 2. I'd like an optional description element added to the <icon> element. > > 3. Rename from JISP to something else. > > 4. Remove anything Jabber-specific and consider moving to > freedesktop.org. > > Richard >
Nope, no specific objections. As long as we don't lose any features, I'm cool with it. Thanks -- Matt _______________________________________________ kopete-devel mailing list kopete-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
