On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 21:41 +0100, Olivier Goffart wrote: > My concern is about the fact the JEP/XEP is focused on Jabber and Instant > messaging, while it could be usefull in other place (mail client, web > forum, ...) > - The name "JISP" (Jabber Icon Style Package) is bad.
Perhaps we can get this changed. > - This should not be a XEP in the first place. freedesktop could maybe be a > better place to host the format specification. All implementation details > related to Jabber clients could anyway be a part of a "good-practice" XEP Even if it should be hosted at freedesktop.org, it's a good base. If nothing else, we can start with that text and edit from there. > Anyway, since many client already implement it, we should try to keep a > compatibility as much as possible. This seems like a compelling argument in favor. Matt, do you have other specific objections to the format in that XEP? I'd like to come up with a list of things to change, and then take it to standards-jig and go from there. Taking into account previous comments here, I have this list: 1. Replace the "abuse" of xml:lang with a real protocol attribute. 2. I'd like an optional description element added to the <icon> element. 3. Rename from JISP to something else. 4. Remove anything Jabber-specific and consider moving to freedesktop.org. Richard
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ kopete-devel mailing list kopete-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
