Le 22/02/2012 00:49, Chris Nighswonger a écrit :
> I also agree with Colin. Lets go with invoices and work from there
> toward ridding the db of prefixed table names.
Colin, Galen, Chris_n, i've added your voice to "Remove all prefix" option.
It seems we have almost reached a consensus, only Zeno w
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Colin Campbell <
colin.campb...@ptfs-europe.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 02:08:07PM +0100, Paul Poulain wrote:
> >
> > My proposal is that we should go the easiest way:
> > * for now, the table should be called "aqinvoices", to be consistent
> > with othe
Hi,
On Feb 21, 2012, at 10:09 AM, Colin Campbell wrote:
> Why not just invoices, I think the prefixes are superfluous ( orders
> invoices etc are relevant objects outside of acquisition, serials uses
> them for instance and we dont need to distinguish them from some other
> type of order ) But jus
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 02:08:07PM +0100, Paul Poulain wrote:
>
>
> My proposal is that we should go the easiest way:
>
> * for now, the table
Hi to all,
>- Messaggio originale -
>Da: "Paul Poulain"
>Oggetto: Re: [Koha-devel] [Discussion tech] database table naming
Le 10/02/2012 11:44, Paul Poulain a écrit :
> The possible options are on
> http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Table_naming, let's s
> My proposal is that we should go the easiest way:
> * for now, the table should be called "aqinvoices", to be consistent
> with other acquisitions related tables.
> * in the medium/long term, get rid of any prefix, and rename "aq*" tables.
I think this is a good plan. While the other "aq" prefix
Le 21/02/2012 14:40, Marcel de Rooy a écrit :
> Why not call it invoices, and be not consistent with an inconsistency?
The 1st patch was without the "aq" and some noticed this
inconsistency... Overall I think it's more consistent to have the "aq"
for now.
> Renaming all aq tables is theoretically
] namens Paul Poulain
[paul.poul...@biblibre.com]
Verzonden: dinsdag 21 februari 2012 14:08
To: koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
Onderwerp: Re: [Koha-devel] [Discussion tech] database table naming
Le 10/02/2012 11:44, Paul Poulain a écrit :
> The possible options are on
> http://wik
Le 10/02/2012 11:44, Paul Poulain a écrit :
> The possible options are on
> http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Table_naming, let's start the
> discussion !
Back to this thread... as it seems that no-one want to start the discussion.
My proposal is that we should go the easiest way:
* for now, th
Op 15-02-12 08:46, Marc Balmer schreef:
> Oh, I was not suggesting using MySQL databases like PostgreSQL schemas,
> I was merely pointing out the similarity.
Oh good :) from the SQL level, they are reasonably similar.
Robin.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Am 14.02.12 20:41, schrieb Robin Sheat:
> Op 15-02-12 08:37, Marc Balmer schreef:
>> Turns out that MySQL indeed has no schema support. But it supports
>> cross-database-queries.
>>
>> A "database" in MySQL is very similar, if not the same, as a "schema" in
>> PostgreSQL.
>
> Noo, not quite. I me
Op 15-02-12 08:37, Marc Balmer schreef:
> Turns out that MySQL indeed has no schema support. But it supports
> cross-database-queries.
>
> A "database" in MySQL is very similar, if not the same, as a "schema" in
> PostgreSQL.
Noo, not quite. I mean, they can be used like that, but I would be
str
Am 14.02.12 20:34, schrieb Marc Balmer:
> Am 14.02.12 15:10, schrieb Paul Poulain:
>> Le 10/02/2012 12:14, Marc Balmer a écrit :
>>> afaik, both MySQL and PostgreSQL support schemas.
>> I couldn't find how it works on mySQL. Does anyone have a link with some
>> explanation ?
>
> I will try to find
Am 14.02.12 15:10, schrieb Paul Poulain:
> Le 10/02/2012 12:14, Marc Balmer a écrit :
>> afaik, both MySQL and PostgreSQL support schemas.
> I couldn't find how it works on mySQL. Does anyone have a link with some
> explanation ?
I will try to find out. Maybe a topic for discussions in Marseille.
Le 10/02/2012 12:14, Marc Balmer a écrit :
> afaik, both MySQL and PostgreSQL support schemas.
I couldn't find how it works on mySQL. Does anyone have a link with some
explanation ?
--
Paul POULAIN
http://www.biblibre.com
Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc
Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08
___
Am 10.02.12 23:15, schrieb David Schuster:
> Where you the one working on getting Koha to work with postgres SQL?
Yes.
> The School district I work for wants to see about making Koha work with
> SequelSQL(Microsoft)...
A bad choice. Consider PostgreSQL.
>
> What have you found in your journe
Am 10.02.12 11:44, schrieb Paul Poulain:
> Continuing with open discussion for the future of Koha:
>
> On the page http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/DB_schema_bugs, we have
> referenced some inconsistencies on the database.
> One of them is about table naming : acquisition related tables all sta
Continuing with open discussion for the future of Koha:
On the page http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/DB_schema_bugs, we have
referenced some inconsistencies on the database.
One of them is about table naming : acquisition related tables all start
by aq, other tables don't have any prefix.
OTOH
18 matches
Mail list logo
