On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 02:08:07PM +0100, Paul Poulain wrote: > > > My proposal is that we should go the easiest way: > > * for now, the table should be called "aqinvoices", to be consistent > > with other acquisitions related tables. > > * in the medium/long term, get rid of any prefix, and rename "aq*" > tables.
Why not just invoices, I think the prefixes are superfluous ( orders invoices etc are relevant objects outside of acquisition, serials uses them for instance and we dont need to distinguish them from some other type of order ) But just because we've done one more sensibly we dont need to bring the rest into line, I'm perfectly willing to continue cursing at that aq prefix (my fingers want to type acq) and we can postpone 'the great renaming' until we get around to something that requires the interface to the orders table to be updated. Colin -- Colin Campbell Chief Software Engineer, PTFS Europe Limited Content Management and Library Solutions +44 (0) 800 756 6803 (phone) +44 (0) 7759 633626 (mobile) colin.campb...@ptfs-europe.com skype: colin_campbell2 http://www.ptfs-europe.com _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
