On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Colin Campbell < colin.campb...@ptfs-europe.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 02:08:07PM +0100, Paul Poulain wrote: > > > > My proposal is that we should go the easiest way: > > * for now, the table should be called "aqinvoices", to be consistent > > with other acquisitions related tables. > > * in the medium/long term, get rid of any prefix, and rename "aq*" > > tables. > > Why not just invoices, I think the prefixes are superfluous ( orders > invoices etc are relevant objects outside of acquisition, serials uses > them for instance and we dont need to distinguish them from some other > type of order ) I also agree with Colin. Lets go with invoices and work from there toward ridding the db of prefixed table names. Kind Regards, Chris
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
