Le 21/02/2012 14:40, Marcel de Rooy a écrit : > Why not call it invoices, and be not consistent with an inconsistency? The 1st patch was without the "aq" and some noticed this inconsistency... Overall I think it's more consistent to have the "aq" for now.
> Renaming all aq tables is theoretically preferred of course. But is it worth > the energy? I think that, on the long term, yes, it's worth the energy. I'm sure you've been surprised more than once by some inconsistencies: ppl that know how Koha work don't have much problem with them. But being consistent helps a lot ppl to understand how things are written when they start hacking. PS: I agree that the table prefix is not the biggest inconsistency we have. About SQL, the biggest one is probably singular/plural table names ! -- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08 _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
