https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331878
Gianluca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|7.5.0 |7.4.0
Platform|Ubuntu Packages
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331878
--- Comment #15 from Gianluca ---
Created attachment 149385
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=149385&action=edit
Screen Capture for Comment 14
Screen Capture for Comment 14.
You can see that the two files P5300273.JPG and P5300273.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331878
--- Comment #17 from Gianluca ---
(In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #16)
> But that would be expected behavior. You have created a derivative version
> of an original image and have enabled the option to hide the original image
> in th
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466720
Bug ID: 466720
Summary: selecting a differnt mic (usb mic) nothing change, and
it rec only with webcam microphone.
Classification: Applications
Product: kdenlive
Version: 22.12.1
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466720
--- Comment #2 from gianluca ---
You can close the bug.
Il dom 18 feb 2024, 19:22 ha scritto:
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466720
>
> diekuhran...@web.de changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427794
Bug ID: 427794
Summary: Systemsetting5 & plasma-discover crash
Product: systemsettings
Version: 5.20.0
Platform: Neon Packages
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Keyword
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331878
--- Comment #23 from Gianluca ---
I would close this bug.
As I pointed out in [comment #20], the original photos can be viewed by
disabling the option to hide previous versions.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331878
--- Comment #20 from Gianluca ---
Are we sure this is still to be considered a bug?
As far as I have understood (and tested, actually):
- You start with a set of grouped image
- You edit one of them
- Saving the edited image, if it is the first
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417121
Gianluca changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||coviello...@gmail.com
--- Comment #7 from Gianluca
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417121
--- Comment #9 from Gianluca ---
(In reply to caulier.gilles from comment #8)
> [...]
I made several tests. At the end of the day, my conclusions are that:
- preloading libxcb-dri3 is not necessary
- preloading libnss3 AND libnss3-utils is necess
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445087
gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||g_...@hotmail.com
--- Comment #
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455513
Bug ID: 455513
Summary: Tiny icons in Dolphin tree and in menu dropdown
Product: plasmashell
Version: master
Platform: Archlinux Packages
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446468
--- Comment #28 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
Is there any update on this issue? If you could point me in the good code byte
I could spend some time trying to fix it. Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug cha
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446468
--- Comment #22 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
Any progress on this? Or can an expert point to the code where the code is
implemented?
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=483151
Bug ID: 483151
Summary: Skanpage scans only 75dpi
Classification: Applications
Product: Skanpage
Version: 24.02.0
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446468
--- Comment #35 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
I still believe it is inconsistent because the selection behaves differently if
the folder icon is of a regular folder or a hidden folder.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446468
--- Comment #16 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
I think that the best solution is to dralw a dark shadow around the folder
icon. It is definitely more consistent with the desktop behaviour. Do you
agree?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446468
--- Comment #17 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to medin from comment #12)
> Created attachment 146158 [details]
> Dark shadow behind selected icons
Definitely the best solution
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455513
--- Comment #2 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
Hello Nate,
agreed but before 5.25 I could scale like this. The proble is that small icons
are not sensitive to changing its size in system settings. I think it is a bug.
Gianluca
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455513
--- Comment #4 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
System settings, appearance, icons, configure icons size. I normally set small
icons to 32.
That's enough up to plasma 5.24.5.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug chang
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455513
--- Comment #6 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 150130
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=150130&action=edit
Dolphin with screen resized 150%
I tried to scale with video scaling to 150% and the result is ugly. I mean
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455513
gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NOT A BUG |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446468
--- Comment #21 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
Another side effect of the bug is that when you are editing a line in dolphin,
all the other fields become white on white ie invisible.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428800
--- Comment #2 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #1)
> Are you still experiencing this with Plasma 5.22?
Hello Nate,
sorry for late reply.
No I don't experience flickering any more. I moved to Intel 2D graphics
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428800
--- Comment #4 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #3)
> Sure, that would be be great, thanks!
Just done, so far no issue, I'm in X11 session
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
rease by one level for tablet mode
instead of fixing absolute values
What do you think?
Regards
Gianluca
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455513
--- Comment #11 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
I agree with you that the way I (and probably others) scale the screen is
weird. The reasons are:
- widgets size is too big with uniform scaling. I saw there is some discussion
to have an adjustable
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457679
Bug ID: 457679
Summary: In Wayland the CTRL+ click doesn't work with
Latte-Dock
Product: lattedock
Version: git (master)
Platform: Archlinux Packages
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428800
--- Comment #5 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
(In reply to Gianluca Pettinello from comment #4)
> (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #3)
> > Sure, that would be be great, thanks!
>
> Just done, so far no issue, I'm in X11 ses
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433115
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianluca.pettinello@gmail.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413394
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianluca.pettinello@gmail.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438874
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianluca.pettinello@gmail.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438494
Bug ID: 438494
Summary: Flickering when closing modal dialog
Product: kwin
Version: 5.22.0
Platform: Archlinux Packages
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Severity: norm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428800
Bug ID: 428800
Summary: Screen flicker after long screen lock upon resume
Product: plasmashell
Version: 5.20.2
Platform: Archlinux Packages
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446468
--- Comment #30 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
Hello all,
Will the new ocean breeze theme have the same white select folder? Btw if a
folder is hidden it does not get white. So it is an inconsistent behavior.
Thanks for an update
Gianluca
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=475622
Bug ID: 475622
Summary: Skanpage doesn't change dpi
Classification: Applications
Product: Skanpage
Version: 23.08.2
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446468
gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||g_...@hotmail.com
--- Comment #
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430891
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianluca.pettinello@gmail.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446468
--- Comment #5 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
Is there any update?
Saw in Nate's post that Dolphin 22.04 will have full line selection. Maybe it
solves also this bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447215
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianluca.pettinello@gmail.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446468
--- Comment #9 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
In reply to Nate: maybe a good solution is to draw a white or black shadowed
border on the icon to not have it merged with the selection
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430436
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianluca.pettinello@gmail.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409499
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianluca.pettinello@gmail.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446468
--- Comment #26 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
I solved as suggested here by creating a local icon set slightly darker for the
folders, which by the way is even more awesome. After all why to have selection
and folder color the same?
--
You ar
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85023
Gianluca Sforna changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOT A BUG
Status|REPORTED
the notification is going to disappear.
Looks very Spartan.
Is it possible to set transparency and remove the vertical line?
Thanks
Gianluca
STEPS TO REPRODUCE
1.
2.
3.
OBSERVED RESULT
EXPECTED RESULT
SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS
Windows:
macOS:
Linux/KDE Plasma:
(available in About System)
KDE
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408711
--- Comment #2 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
Ok, and sorry if my tone was harsh, since you work hard every day to make kde
better. If ever you consider one day to add transparency and blur to the
notification and to increase the border padding that
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365924
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianluca.pettinello@gmail.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409518
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianluca.pettinello@gmail.c
real problem as the system works but really annoying.
Thanks for solving
Gianluca
EXPECTED RESULT
SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS
Windows:
macOS:
Linux/KDE Plasma:
(available in About System)
KDE Plasma Version:
KDE Frameworks Version:
Qt Version:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=411833
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
Platform|Other |Archlinux Packages
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=330820
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianluca.pettinello@gmail.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379637
--- Comment #26 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
Coming back to the topic as I'm hard to give up if I think the goal is
reachable.
The function:
Xcb::Property property(false, id, atoms->kde_net_wm_shadow, XCB_ATOM_CARDINAL,
0, 12);
as it is c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379637
--- Comment #28 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
(In reply to Martin Flöser from comment #27)
> the pixmap is created by the client.
Could you tell me in which point of the code?
Thanks :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379637
--- Comment #30 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
(In reply to David Edmundson from comment #29)
> For an example see DialogShadows.cpp in plasma-framework.
>
> You'd have to get that done by the GTK process.
And if we trap it and force s
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379637
--- Comment #32 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
(In reply to David Edmundson from comment #31)
> How?
If we use the DialogShadows.cpp code and apply it to each Window that has
_GTK_FRAME_EXTENTS enabled (we can trap it in kwin events.cpp)?
Too n
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379637
--- Comment #34 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
(In reply to Martin Flöser from comment #33)
> yes, as soon as gtk adds that property window management breaks
But if we added _KDE_NETWM_SHADOW property with shadw pixmaps, how can gtk
destroy them?
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405521
Bug ID: 405521
Summary: Blinking launch feedback wrong blinking
Product: kwin
Version: 5.15.3
Platform: Archlinux Packages
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Severity: n
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379637
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianluca.pettinello@gmail.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400611
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianluca.pettinello@gmail.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400634
Bug ID: 400634
Summary: No menu drop shadow in libreoffice, firefox and gtk
apps
Product: kwin
Version: 5.14.2
Platform: Archlinux Packages
OS: Linux
S
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391917
--- Comment #10 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
We all know that gnome developers are doing wrong because they build a DE based
on their view imposed to the commumity rather than listening to the needs of
the community. We also know that they regularly
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421273
Bug ID: 421273
Summary: Slow zoom animation
Product: lattedock
Version: 0.9.11
Platform: Archlinux Packages
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Severity: normal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421273
--- Comment #1 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
Just to update, the git version doesn't have this issue while version 0.9.11-1
in Arch has
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422023
Bug ID: 422023
Summary: Feature request: add minimize all on present windows
effect
Product: kwin
Version: unspecified
Platform: Archlinux Packages
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391917
--- Comment #13 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
First of all I apologize for the late reply
@Martin
You are right indeed Gnome developers are difficult to convince.
I have a question.
If we use gtk-nocsd package (in Archlinux AUR) we get server side
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391917
--- Comment #14 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
Going nowhere indeed :(
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391917
--- Comment #16 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
What you mean that gtk has to upload the shadow? Has gtk to fill an atom with
the properties of the shadow? Sorry if I say something wrong but I'm not an
expert.
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391917
--- Comment #19 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
But can we trap a gtk window and let breeze make the shadow its own way? So we
get also consistency in the shadow rendering, while csd is against consistency.
Silly question: is it breeze or kwin who says if
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403440
Bug ID: 403440
Summary: Menu blur not working move to pop up menu
Product: Breeze
Version: 5.14.5
Platform: Archlinux Packages
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Severit
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379637
--- Comment #6 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
Is it possible to implement 1) Server side shadows on both top level windows
and to popups and menus? It would give more consistency to the applications.
If we give each client the freedom to draw shadows as
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379637
--- Comment #15 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
I think discussion is getting too much emotional, probably because there is a
lot of past efforts and frustration due to gtk always changing cards on the
table.
Is it not better to force server side
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379637
--- Comment #17 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
I understand the point. My suggestions coming from my experience in a chemical
industry:
1) Be the teacher to the others since you have deep knowledge. Write a document
explaining the structure of kwin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379637
--- Comment #20 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
(In reply to Martin Flöser from comment #19)
> Ok, I think I need to explain more on the situation on X11. The problem is
> not that the code is fragile, undocumented or umaintained. The code is good,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379637
--- Comment #24 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #22)
> RESOLVED FIXED isn't an appropriate status if the issue of GTK3 headerbar
> windows not getting shadows hasn't actually been fixed.
>
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336617
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|0.19.1 |1.6.0
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402730
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianluca.pettinello@gmail.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402730
--- Comment #7 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
Thanks Nate for the(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #6)
> You already can, sort of. What you can't currently do is choose the font
> size/style etc. just for headings. That's somethi
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339214
Gianluca Frustagli changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianf...@tiscali.it
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366388
Gianluca Frustagli changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianf...@tiscali.it
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362339
Gianluca Frustagli changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianf...@tiscali.it
--- Comment #6 from
81 matches
Mail list logo
