zzi ha scritto:
>
>> Da: Paolo Rizzi
>> Oggetto: Re: [JPP-Devel] feature vs item
>> A: "OpenJump develop and use"
>> Data: Lunedì 9 marzo 2009, 17:29
>> >> Hi Peppe,
>> >> just my personal opinion...
>> >> Often the best tra
--- Lun 9/3/09, Paolo Rizzi ha scritto:
> Da: Paolo Rizzi
> Oggetto: Re: [JPP-Devel] feature vs item
> A: "OpenJump develop and use"
> Data: Lunedì 9 marzo 2009, 17:29
> >> Hi Peppe,
> >> just my personal opinion...
> >> Often the be
d of
> > element)
> > >
> > > * when item means "componente": an
> indivisible part of a geometry, like
> > inner ring
> > >
> > > This new translation avoid terminology which was
> improperly used (like
> > the italian "oggetto&q
geometry, like inner ring
>>> This new translation avoid terminology which was
>> improperly used (like the italian "oggetto"
>> (object) for component) or a multiplication of terminologies
>> (I found in Spanish that "entidad",
>> "elemento"
--- Lun 9/3/09, Paolo Rizzi ha scritto:
> Da: Paolo Rizzi
> Oggetto: Re: [JPP-Devel] feature vs item
> A: "OpenJump develop and use"
> Data: Lunedì 9 marzo 2009, 16:05
> Hi Peppe,
> just my personal opinion...
> Often the best translation of English tech
t; >> only example of this)
> >>
> >> There are technical reasons to make this distinction.
> >> Either term could
> >> be used in the context of SelectionManager, I think.
> >>
> >> Rahkonen Jukka wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >
lemento" and sometimes
> "item" where used with the same meaning of "feature").
>
> I ask Michael if he agree with this modification.
> ________________________
>
> @Stefan
>
> These language files are almost complete. The Sp
used word suggested by the Finnish Geodetic
> Institute, but I feel it is bit too scientific now, "primitive". Perhaps I
> let them both be "features" in the next translation for OJ 1.3.
>
> -Jukka-
>
> -Alkuperäinen viesti-----
> Lähettäjä: Michaël Mic
too scientific now, "primitive". Perhaps I
> let them both be "features" in the next translation for OJ 1.3.
>
> -Jukka-
>
> -Alkuperäinen viesti-
> Lähettäjä: Michaël Michaud [mailto:michael.mich...@free.fr]
> Lähetetty: pe 6.3.2009 21:38
> Vastaanot
res"
in the next translation for OJ 1.3.
-Jukka-
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Michaël Michaud [mailto:michael.mich...@free.fr]
Lähetetty: pe 6.3.2009 21:38
Vastaanottaja: OpenJump develop and use
Aihe: Re: [JPP-Devel] feature vs item
Hi,
I think Sunburned Surveyor is correct.
&q
Hi,
I think Sunburned Surveyor is correct.
"Item" refers to the way SelectionManager works (see the second and
third button of the edition toolbox).
Selection manager can select the whole geometry of a feature, or only a
part of this geometry, or only a ring in a polygon in a multipolygon...
An
Acutally, I beleive there is a difference between the two (2) terms,
and a specific reason for using one and not the other in OpenJUMP.
Martin Davis or Jon Aquino could confirm what I am about to say.
An "item" can refer to a feature that is part of a composite Feature
or FeatureCollection. (A Fea
Hi Peppe,
I guess you are referring to things like "Copy items" and "Paste Items."
Items, in this case is simply a more vague term for features. It was
probably chosen because it occurs in other applications, and is therefor a
familiar user interface. The less specific terms would be useful if
well.. from my perspective there is not really a difference.
But: the term Feature is used in GIS terminology for Geographic Objects
on the one hand. On the other hand, Feature is used also in terms of
"property" in everyday English (and in particular in computer science) -
i.e. it does not refe
14 matches
Mail list logo
