I think "element" is the next closest word in English to the word
"item" as we are using it in this context. You could use "thing", but
I agree that isn't very professional.

Perhaps some of our other native English speakers could comment.

SS

On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Rahkonen Jukka
<jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I understood feature vs. item in the same way than others here when 
> translating OJ into Finnish for the first time.  Mostly by trying the tools 
> and looking what they did when selecting eithere features or items.  Problem 
> is that I couldn't find good translation to "item". What in the way suits 
> best in Finnish translates back to English as a "thing".  That does not sound 
> professional.  I have now used word suggested by the Finnish Geodetic 
> Institute, but I feel it is bit too scientific now, "primitive".  Perhaps I 
> let them both be "features" in the next translation for OJ 1.3.
>
> -Jukka-
>
> -----Alkuperäinen viesti-----
> Lähettäjä: Michaël Michaud [mailto:michael.mich...@free.fr]
> Lähetetty: pe 6.3.2009 21:38
> Vastaanottaja: OpenJump develop and use
> Aihe: Re: [JPP-Devel] feature vs item
>
> Hi,
>
> I think Sunburned Surveyor is correct.
>
> "Item" refers to the way SelectionManager works (see the second and
> third button of the edition toolbox).
> Selection manager can select the whole geometry of a feature, or only a
> part of this geometry, or only a ring in a polygon in a multipolygon...
> Any of thoses things are called item. Martin or Jon will correct me if I
> misunderstood.
>
> @peppe : in french, I usually translate Feature as Object, Geometry as
> Geometrie, and Item as...hum not sure, most often "Element", but I may
> have changed depending on the context (Composant and Polyligne in the
> context of the editing toolbar)
>
> Michaël
>
>
> Sunburned Surveyor a écrit :
>> Acutally, I beleive there is a difference between the two (2) terms,
>> and a specific reason for using one and not the other in OpenJUMP.
>> Martin Davis or Jon Aquino could confirm what I am about to say.
>>
>> An "item" can refer to a feature that is part of a composite Feature
>> or FeatureCollection. (A FeatureCollection can also be a Feature.) For
>> example, a LineString that is part of a MultiLineString would be an
>> "item".
>>
>> Check out page 14 of the old developer guide for this explanation:
>>
>> "FeatureSelection (in which the user has selected whole features),
>> PartSelection (in
>> which the user has selected parts of a GeometryCollection feature), and
>> LineStringSelection (in which the user has selected LineStrings inside
>> a Polygon or
>> GeometryCollection). So a user can select not only whole features but
>> also pieces of them."
>>
>> This distinction is made frequently in the source code for the
>> selection manager. I acutally find that the use of items makes the
>> code much more complex, but I remember Martin or Jon explaining there
>> was a good reason for implementing the selection mechanism this way.
>>
>> Landon
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Larry Becker <becker.la...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Peppe,
>>>
>>>   I guess you are referring to things like "Copy items" and "Paste Items."
>>> Items, in this case is simply a more vague term for features.  It was
>>> probably chosen because it occurs in other applications, and is therefor a
>>> familiar user interface.  The less specific terms would be useful if it
>>> becomes possible to perform the functions on things other than features.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Larry
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Giuseppe Aruta <giuseppe_ar...@yahoo.it>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> hi all,
>>>> I am conscious this is an old discussion:
>>>> What is the difference between item and feature?  Which one of them is
>>>> synonimous of object?
>>>>
>>>> I also ask to non-english speakers to write down the terminology in their
>>>> languages (basically Latine language like Spanish, French, Portuguese).
>>>> Giving a look into the files languages I discover some differences,
>>>> sometimes opposte usage.
>>>>
>>>> Regads
>>>>
>>>> Peppe
>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________
>>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>>> Poco spazio e tanto spam? Yahoo! Mail ti protegge dallo spam e ti da tanto
>>>> spazio gratuito per i tuoi file e i messaggi
>>>> http://mail.yahoo.it
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco,
>>>> CA
>>>> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the
>>>> Enterprise
>>>> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source
>>>> participation
>>>> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code:
>>>> SFAD
>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>>>> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://amusingprogrammer.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
>>> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
>>> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
>>> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>>> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
>> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
>> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
>> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
>> _______________________________________________
>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
> _______________________________________________
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
> _______________________________________________
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel

Reply via email to