ngs(),
};
?>
The `default` pattern must be the last item in the last expression branch.
Thanks,
Andreas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 22.11.21 22:06, Nikita Popov wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 7:18 PM Andreas wrote:
Hi internals,
This is a proposal to allow to append the `default` pattern by
comma to
the end of the last match branch. (Like a conditional_expression)
This allows to re-use the
hows you how many years, months, days, etc there are between two
> dates. The second is the actual interval between two dates. The first is
> context dependent - it needs anchoring in at least one date. The second is
> context indepe
Hi Côme.
According to the gophp7-ext project the LDAP module isn't maintained.
(I've just looked it up this morning). See
https://github.com/gophp7/gophp7-ext/wiki/extensions-catalog. Would you
want or consider thinking about taking over?
Cheers
Andreas
Am 21.04.15 um 09:18 sc
nt $money) {
$money = $money * CURRENT_VAT;
return $money;
}
which would alter the object in question!
Or are we talking about two completely different things?
Cheers
Andreas
--
please speak up.
>
> Is there a place where such requirements are supposed to be listed?
I'd expect an appropriate information at least at
http://php.net/manual/
way in PHP8" kind of decission? And will it be possible to get
that marked deprecated in 7 at all?
Thanks for your help in getting this right.
Cheers
Andreas
[1] https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/1357
[2]
http://www.openldap.org/devel/gitweb.cgi?p=openldap.git;
Hi Anatol.
Côme already replied to the technical aspects of what we are trying to do.
Am 25.06.15 um 17:56 schrieb Anatol Belski:
> Hi Andreas,
>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Andreas Heigl [mailto:andr...@heigl.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015
Hi all.
Am 25.06.15 um 17:56 schrieb Anatol Belski:
> Any feedback from the ldap users were appreciated here, as well.
* https://github.com/smalot/ldap uses ldap_sort, issue is raised
* https://github.com/matgou/GorgLdapOrmBundle uses ldap_sort, informed
the maintainer via email
Cheers
Andr
for an integrated
> solution, kind of expected to work.
Why would that be expected behaviour? I mean I can't do
$date = (DateTime) $timestring;
after all, can I? But I can use
$date = new
rce us to rename the
> library again ;-).
What's the issue with the name?
As far as I see it, There's no problem at all, as there's UString and
then there's Hoa\UString. Different namespace, no issue.
Or am I missing something?
Cheers
Andreas
>
> Moreover, this lib
g? Or am I missing the declaration of the
$cacheTime Variable in or before the else-block?
So efectively you assign $cacheTime = self::void
Not sure whether that's a good idea in the first place ;)
Cheers
Andreas
>
> Cheers,
> Patrick
>
--
unication.
And to be honnest: For me it shows a certain understanding of the way the web
works when you are able to setup your tools to be able to follow the
discussions on internals. And I'm not sure Whether I want someone messing
arround with the language that powers 80% of the WorldWideW
real PITA, at least for users without a php.net account.
I'm not sure why it's a PITA. you can search for issues without problems. And
if you miss certain functions you can open a PR. Yes, without karma you can't
change anything. Which - AFAIK - isn't possible in github or an
> Am 02.08.2015 um 17:12 schrieb Niklas Keller :
>
> 2015-08-02 16:48 GMT+02:00 Andreas Heigl :
>
>> Hi Niklas
>>
>>> Am 02.08.2015 um 16:26 schrieb Niklas Keller :
>>>
>>> 2015-08-02 15:29 GMT+02:00 Rowan Collins :
>>>
>>&g
push notification via Email ;)
* retrieval via news-protocol.
I (and I presume a lot of others) like to get the news delivered to my doorstep
instead of having to pull the relevant information from a web-interface.
Cheers
Andreas
>
> Regards,
> --
> Rowan Collins
>
ering the entry barrier" is in the
end a discussion about "let's bring it all to HTTP". The internet is so much
more than HTTP. And the internet is so much more than an implementation of that
protocol by any service provider be it google or yahoo or whatnot.
Cheers
Andreas
ber the case sensitivity on osx (for hfs) can be
> enabled optionally, or?
Case sensitivity is not an issue of OS X but of the underlying Filesystem which
is by default on HFS+ disabled. You can enable case sensitivity by reformating
the partition using case-sensitive HFS+
Cheers
Andreas
--
Andreas Heigl
andr...@heigl.org
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
ason behind the cleanup (and therefore removal of
ifdefs) was that we wanted to optimize PHPs ldap-functions and remove those
calls to long-deprecated functions in the OpenLDAP library. Sonwe'll have to
check what's possible with the Solaris lib.
Out of interest: What is for you the benefit of using the Solaris-ldap lib
instead of the OpenLDAP lib? I'd like to get a feeling for the issue!
Cheers
Andreas
--
Andreas Heigl
andr...@heigl.org
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
give that up for
maintaining compatibility with some edge-case usages. So I'm very interested in
your patch to see how we can rech both goals!
In the meantime you can still use the "old" ext/ldap for the newer PHP-branch
as it should compile without an issue. The "newer" ext/ldap just removed stuff
;)
Cheers
Andreas
> Regards,
>
> Rainer
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi Rainer.
Am 13.08.15 um 16:39 schrieb Rainer Jung:
> Am 12.08.2015 um 13:17 schrieb Andreas Heigl:
>> Hi Rainer.
>>
>>> Am 12.08.2015 um 13:00 schrieb Rainer Jung :
>>>
>>> Hi Côme,
>>>
>>>> Am 11.08.2015 um 16:58 schrieb Côme BER
On 24.08.24 18:49, Bilge wrote:
Hi gang,
New RFC just dropped: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/default_expression. I
think some of you might enjoy this one. Hit me with any feedback.
This one already comes complete with working implementation that I've
been cooking for a little while. Considering I do
On 26.08.24 11:26, Bilge wrote:
Thanks for this question; I find this super interesting because it's
something we haven't thought about yet. I must admit I completely
overlooked that, whilst an interface /can/ require implementers to
specify a default, in the case that they do not, it is still v
Hey folks.
Am 26.08.24 um 11:26 schrieb Bilge:
On 26/08/2024 10:03, Andreas Leathley wrote:
On 24.08.24 18:49, Bilge wrote:
For me there is another question. When using interfaces and classes,
default values can be introduced, like this:
interface CompressionInterface
{
public function
Best Practices.
My 0.02€ from having done some maintenance on php.net.
Cheers
Andreas
--
,,,
(o o)
+--------
Hey Christoph, hey all.
Am 27.08.24 um 13:46 schrieb Christoph M. Becker:
On 27.08.2024 at 07:03, Andreas Heigl wrote:
I see this a bid differently to be honest. While I understand that using
third party packages in our internal tools might make things easier in
the short term it will cause a
On 17.09.24 11:14, Mike Schinkel wrote:
How would a developer know if they are using an object that has
operators, unless they study all the source code or at least the docs
(assuming there are good docs, which there probably are not?)
How is that different from using a method on an object? Ope
On 14.09.24 23:48, Jordan LeDoux wrote:
1. Should the next version of this RFC use the `operator` keyword, or
should that approach be abandoned for something more familiar? Why do
you feel that way?
2. Should the capability to overload comparison operators be provided
in the same RFC, or would
is list some time ago.
I also tried eAccelerator. First it looked nice and seemed to work with
PHP5, but I got some errors with PEAR::MDB2 (something with constructors
I think).
Can someone estimate how far away we are from a working PHP5 release?
Thanks!
best regards,
Andreas
--
PHP Internals -
I'm sorry, should have gone to pecl.dev!
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
stall packages (which is a good idea
IMHO) all users (not only superusers) need a reliable tool for
installation/management (also without shell-account).
best regards
Andreas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
and it'll go bad if
> we don't move the major pieces along.
Absolutely! I'm really looking forward to all these great, new features!
(I have scripts running 40-50% faster with 5.1-dev; PDO, xmlreader,
pecl_http work great...)
kind regards
Andreas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Dev
if we
don't move the major pieces along.
Absolutely! I'm really looking forward to all these great, new features!
(I have scripts running 40-50% faster with 5.1-dev; PDO, xmlreader,
pecl_http work great...)
kind regards
Andreas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing L
nt of tests against the amount of functionality provided.
OK, I wrote some small scripts and it worked quite nice. Very good work,
it's (or will be...) a really useful extension!
I hope it will be added to php-core some day ;-)
best regards
Andreas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime D
Derick Rethans wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Andreas Korthaus wrote:
Will pecl_http be included?
(AFAIR something like that has been discussed earlier this year on this list)
We have the policy of not adding more very specialized extensions to the
PHP core distribution - those extensions
without a
compiler and without the required knowledge...
Andreas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
crappy; if you're serious about it, I'd suggest upgrading to
PHP 5.1 and using PDO SQLITE instead. SQLite 3 (which it uses)
actually has a concept of binary data.
I'll think about it - does the row size limit still exist in SQLite 3?
Andreas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development
Hi,
The last snapshot of PHP 5.0.x (including the PECL extensions) for
Win32 is from Jul 22. But I need one from today. Is this delay desired?
Andreas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
a good idea,
least of all for a setup under high load because of the arguments
already mentioned in this thread and because most developers don't use
threaded setups today.
best regards,
Andreas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
lighttpd does the same, it's a non-blocking webserver with only one
process. The one process cares about keep-alives... and delegates
handling of PHP-Requests to a number of loadbalanced, persistent PHP
Processes using FastCGI.
Andreas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mail
HP 5.0.4.
And in 5.0.5 it's fatal error, not only notice.
best regards
Andreas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Am 14.09.2005 um 14:36 schrieb Derick Rethans:
Since we can detect a ref to a temp var at call time now, how about
making a local copy in the function and effectively treat it as a
by-value arg and also issue an E_NOTICE or an E_STRICT? I think that
would solve the corruption problem without b
Am 14.09.2005 um 15:10 schrieb Derick Rethans:
Of course it does, you have a ) too much. Besides this, the following
I should drink more coffee...
script does not make a fatal error:
Fatal error: Only variables can be passed by reference in /home/www/
core/media.class.php on line 221
Am 14.09.2005 um 15:40 schrieb Derick Rethans:
$filename = sprintf('%s.%s', md5(uniqid(rand(), true)), array_pop
(explode('.', $name)));
echo $filename;
D'oh - I see it. My ISP changed the PHP version once again. It's now
PHP 5.0.5. I'm very very sorry for the confusion.
A.
--
PHP Inte
Hi,
I try do get PHP 5.0 running on a fresh Windows 98 box. Unfortunately
there are some issues with some missing dlls. I was able to sort most
of them out (e.g. missing ODBC32.dll), but there is at least one that
I'm unable to fix. PHP (php5ts.dll) complains about a missing
OLEAUT32.DLL
Am 27.09.2005 um 13:18 schrieb James Ellis:
Why are you using Windows 98.. it's full of holes and has been
superseded?
For myself, I'm using a brand new G5 from that fruit company in
California, running that shiny and blinking os (I really love it and
I would never switch back). But we h
Am 27.09.2005 um 13:47 schrieb Steph:
Any idea which export is missing? http://
www.dependencywalker.com/ has an
easy-to-use tool for checking .dlls.
A great hint. I already looked for such a tool but I never came
across the right keywords for Google ;)
I put the DependencyWalker image
Am 27.09.2005 um 15:47 schrieb Wez Furlong:
It sounds like your system is broken. You should never copy these
low-level system DLLs between windows versions.
I'll never try it again :)
My suggestion is to start with a fresh copy of win98 and install only
MS updates to get the DLLs that you
extension with different
interface in the documentation.
Or why is the change of old functions like date() needed/useful?
best regards
Andreas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
about the work Derick and Pierre
invested to add better Date support to PHP. If there is an OO API for
the new code some day, I'll be very happy ;-)
best regards
Andreas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Am 27.09.2005 um 15:47 schrieb Wez Furlong:
My suggestion is to start with a fresh copy of win98 and install only
Just for information: It works now. I tried it with a fresh install
of Windows 98, but there's still the problem with the missing export.
After an install of Internet Explorer
ome other
values, the users cannot control, to avoid concurrency issues. Perhaps
make a $_PERSISTENT variable only available for the script which has
created it (by saving the path too, but if you move/rename..., and not
very flexible anymore).
Best regards
Andreas
PS: I've read the
gs.
Can someone tell me the reason for this decision?
best regards
Andreas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
a major project) is to reduce complexity and make
scripts as easy to understand as possible. And PHP makes a good job
here. But I think the {} -> [] change will reduce readability of
scripts, because both programmers and "grep" can't differ arrays from
strings using the [] synta
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Andreas Korthaus wrote:
But you know without understanding of any context, that it's the 6th
character of the string "$str". When you see $var[5], it could be the
6th character of a string, or an element of an array... and what
about the value? You can
ntion, which is used a lot, and which is
quite useful to increase readability of code as described in my other
postings.
I have no problem with changing my code if BC breaks, but in this case
I'd be sad to loose the useful convention "[] for arrays and {} for
strings".
best reg
m probably wrong. For me it's more
important to have the possibility to use a convention (like "$arrays[],
$strings{}") in a project, not to drop something. Looks like if I will
loose this possibility soon.
best regards
Andreas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing L
ace {} with [] syntax, but this
will decrease readability - that's my only problem.
best regards
Andreas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
ut application-wide,
not separated for each user.
best regards
Andreas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Am 25.11.2005 um 10:51 schrieb Matthias Pigulla:
Because of bugs in the safe_mode implementation (forgetting some
checks?) or conceptual problems?
Safe mode doesn't work 'cos there are lots of third party libraries
which PHP relies on and don't take care of the safe mode. That's why
you c
That's why you can't assure security...
Please read: ... this special type of security...
Regards,
A.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
/ftp/ftp.c:2
./ext/curl/streams.c:1
./ext/soap/php_http.c:1
./ext/session/session.c:3
./ext/sockets/sockets.c:5
./ext/standard/uniqid.c:1
./ext/standard/lcg.c:1
./ext/standard/fsock.c:1
./ext/standard/streamsfuncs.c:4
./ext/openssl/xp_ssl.c:2
./main/streams/xp_socket.c:2
./main/network.c:2
Bes
AD
that implements this; otherwise, you'll have to wait until someone is
motivated enough.
OK. I understand that. I'll try my best to come up with a patch set then.
Can someone point me to some documentation on how to do this? Is
someone willing to assist me in making this patch?
Sebastian wrote:
The PHP soap implementation is very fast by the way ... my benchmarks
indicated 3-4ms request times on the LAN (without doing anything useful
inside the request). This compares to over 30ms for the
mod_perl/Soap::Lite implementation (and I haven't tested Java or .Net)
Can
e what else to test right now ... but in particular, the
changes I made to the FTP and IMAP code should get looked at for sanity
(probably best by the maintainers).
Best regards
Andreas
diff -Naur php-src-orig/ext/curl/streams.c php-src/ext/curl/streams.c
--- php-src-orig/ext/curl/streams.c
Hi all,
I had posted a patch on 22 Dec for implementing fractional timeouts (by
treating all timeout variables as floats).
Did anyone had a look at it? Any comments?
Cheers,
Andreas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
core.
I think, 64 bit INTEGER and an "arbitrary precision numbers" datatype
are the last major features missing in PHP!
best regards
Andreas
PS: will a 64 bit INTEGER make it into PHP6?
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
with UNIX epoch timestamps after 2038. Of course, with 64-bit
INTs there was no error to report.
But that's the problem. You need a 64bit integer which is always 64bits
regardless of your platform:
http://www.php.net/~derick/meeting-notes.html#add-a-64bit-integer
regards
Andreas
--
PHP Int
unctions.html.gz
Perhaps some day, when it's ready... it could implement the 5 functions
from ext/http too, and replace that extension without any BC-issues...
best regards
Andreas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
age here? i.e. Can I provide it as
an optional compile flag in the configure script?
I think PECL:memcache is the perfect place for such a session-handler.
best regards
Andreas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
(o o)
+-----ooO-(_)-Ooo-+
| Andreas Heigl |
| mailto:andr...@heigl.org N 50°22'59.5" E 08°23'58" |
| htt
gWithTheException($e);
}
try {
$bar->doNext();
} catch(Exception $e) {
doSomethingWithTheException($e);
}
try {
$bar->doSomethingElse();
} catch(Exception $e) {
doSomethingWithTheException($e);
}
be more what you are talking about?
Re
ould be enabled and if it breaks there is one space to
reset to the previous behaviour.
>
>>
>> --
>> Yasuo Ohgaki
>> yohg...@ohgaki.net
>
Regards
Andreas
--
,,,
hile the legitimate user
> gets kicked out.
>
> Not seeing how that improves things at all.
So what about an ISP that changes the IP-Adress of it's clients e
d. But I'm not sure if it's
OK/complete... and I'm not sure if something like that is really needed
in the core (and I'm definetly not the person to decide on that ;-)).
Anyway, I attatched a simple patch against current 5_2 branch to this
mail, perhaps it helps.
P $a AND $b contain NULL in the end has nothing to do with the
return type of the functions called but with the way PHP handles
assignements. But without the void return type declaration we can't ev
see that it's not supported.
The only extension I'd see to it would be to check whether someone is
trying that and raising an error in PHP describing that "this forma
Am 03.11.15 um 20:07 schrieb Andrea Faulds:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Andreas Heigl wrote:
>> +1 on that solution. Just throwing "host:port" onto something doesn't
>> help anyone. Try that with "www.google.com:443" in your favourite
>> browser. Most wi
try to prohibit such
things in future).
Cheers
Andreas
--
,,,
(o o)
+-----ooO-(_)-Ooo-+
| Andreas Heigl
function test() {
>> A::test();
>> }
>> }
>>
>> $b = new B;
>> $b->test();
>>
You are calling explicitly A::test().
When you call parent::test() everything works as you'd expect it.
Have a look at https://3v4l.org/
voting ends*.
In any case I'm sure that this is something that affects the whole
RFC-Process and should be put up in a separate RFC and not just be
implemented "en passant" in a few lines of code. And In my eyes, as it&#x
ng period is over the vote is
publicly available. So everyone knows who voted what.
Personally I'd opt for version 3 where the vote is *anonymous during the
voting period only*. That way no one can be actively influenced
distinguish between technical votes on what way
the language itself develops (which should always be open and as
transparent as possible) and non-technical votes (which can be very
personal and should therefore respect the privacy of the voter).
Cheers
Andreas
--
Am 12.01.16 um 15:53 schrieb Zeev Suraski:
>
>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Andreas Heigl [mailto:andr...@heigl.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 4:21 PM
>> To: Eli ; internals@lists.php.net
>> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Anonymous voting on wik
ity, the vote should definitely be
> public, and not secret.
Definitely!!! And that requires an RFC that - at least in my eyes -
needs a 2/3rd(+1) majority to be accepted *because* it concerns the
future of the community!
Cheers
Andreas
--
gt; https://wiki.php.net/rfc/adopt-code-of-conduct#constructive_collaboration_guidelines
>
>
> I want this to work, and work together, to get this approved.
>
> cheers,
> Derick
Thank
y that FEEL unhappy. A place they can come to whenever
they FEEL something is going wrong to talk to someone to see whether the
feeling might be accurat or not! And that's the point that is entirely
missing in the whol
upposed to be
in.
In all other cases feature-detection (function_exists/extension_loaded
f.i.) should work fine to determine whether the used engine is able to
run a certain function.
And in the end the goal would be to not adapt the code to different
runtine-engines but to adapt the runtime engin
cts a user-object but can't get one it'll break. Throwing an
exception makes it easy to react to that. But when the code has to check
whether that's a mocked user object or a real user object it's about as good as
returning null or eliminating the return type altogether as
So calling (new Bar())->foo(new BaseClass()) will fail as the method 'b'
isn't implemented, but it should be according to the interface...
Hope that helps ;)
Cheers
Andreas
--
On 11.04.23 15:56, Jeffrey Dafoe wrote:
So turn off the deprecation warnings for now. They're just a heads up that
behaviour is going to change in the future, with PHP 9.
I doubt you'd prefer not to be aware of the change well in advance.
Oh, absolutely. We run those "on" in our dev and QA envi
missed the new takes that weren't discussed there or that
might have changed since that discussion.
At least apart from "there are a lot of new people around" and "the new
people don't want to learn the rules"
Looking forward to your TL;DR
Cheers
Andreas
--
cussions in GitHub
issues. They're not perfect, but hey, neither are mailing lists.
The vendor lock-in is one of the biggest issues that I see with the
PHP-project.
Adding the main discussion platform to the locked resources is probably
not one of the best ideas.
ecessary anyhow as the list-unsubscribe header
already should provide the email-clients with a way to show an
unsubscribe button right in the email.
Any volunteers helping are welcome!
And please do voice concerns regarding point 1
Cheers
Andreas
--
Hey
On 13.04.23 10:38, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
Hi
On 4/13/23 10:29, Andreas Heigl wrote:
1. Remove modification of the emails on the lists server so that DKIM
and DMARC will finally work
Yes, please, but for different reasons:
Filtering is much more reliably performed using the 'li
On 13.04.23 10:50, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
Hi
On 4/13/23 10:46, Andreas Heigl wrote:
DMARC is less of a concern, because the list apparently already performs
DMARC mangling for a policy that is not 'none'
Apart from (possibly) modifying the body and the subject line which then
break
feature of inline code blocks
with return value or behaving as generator)
clone $object with {
...{
yield 'a' => 'A';
yield 'b' => 'B';
},
...{
return ['c' => 'C'],
}
}
-- Andreas
On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 at 08:32
a cached instance with this
value.
I think the "clone with" is much more flexible because we can call
this anywhere, not just in a dedicated method.
This said, I do agree with some of the benefits of the "Alternative" proposal.
-- Andreas
On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 at 08:32, Máté K
an array first, and then
applied, or can php do a "shortcut" where it internally treats it as
an argument list, even though the syntax implies array?
The different will be small, but it could become relevant if called
many times over.
-- Andreas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
list and in
the end the vote on an RFC should have the last say in regards to code.
My 0.02€
Cheers
Andreas
--
,,,
(o o)
+------
1 - 100 of 587 matches
Mail list logo
