Hi George
> Maybe I'm out of the loop but I haven't seen this before
It's my fault, my e-mails went to the spam folder for many people. I'm
sending my e-mails from a different address now which seems to have
resolved the problem.
> What is the limitation leading to this behaviour?
It's to maint
Hi Nikita
> The only thing wrong here is calling this an "exception to the rule" in the
> RFC. This is completely standard and expected behavior given the specified
> precedence. It is in the nature of precedence that there will always be cases
> where the use of () is required, and this is one
On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 2:05 PM Ilija Tovilo wrote:
> Sorry Dan, at the time I sent this e-mail I wasn't aware you wouldn't
> receive it. After not hearing from you I assumed you were ok with my
> response.
>
> > The issue is that as your words are written, it is not possible for me
> > to underst
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 12:03, Ilija Tovilo wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> I hope you're doing well.
>
> I have opened voting for the throw expression RFC.
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/throw_expression
>
> Voting closes on April 19th, 2020.
>
> Regards,
> Ilija
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Develo
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 13:05, Ilija Tovilo wrote:
>
> "What are the rules here, can"
"... the rules are more what you'd call "guidelines" than actual rules."
As a project we should clarify exactly what is meant to happen when
issues are found in an RFC that affect how people are going to vote.
B
Sorry Dan, at the time I sent this e-mail I wasn't aware you wouldn't
receive it. After not hearing from you I assumed you were ok with my
response.
> The issue is that as your words are written, it is not possible for me
> to understand exactly what you mean.
To be fair, you omitted the next sen
Hi Ilija,
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 11:53, Ilija Tovilo wrote:
>
>
> I did respond to that e-mail but probably got classified as spam as
> were the other e-mails I sent with that address. This was my response:
>
> > I've thought about this some more. There is a reasonable way to recognize
> > this,
Hi Dan
> Did the RFC get updated to address this?
>
> As the current behaviour listed* in the RFC seems wrong and surprising to me.
I did respond to that e-mail but probably got classified as spam as
were the other e-mails I sent with that address. This was my response:
> I've thought about this
Hi Iija,
During the discussion of the precedence, you wrote:
> There is a reasonable way to recognize this, namely to check if the expression
> after the throw keyword is of type ZEND_AST_OR or ZEND_AST_AND. The
> expression above will fail with this message (given that $condition is false):
Did
Hi internals,
I hope you're doing well.
I have opened voting for the throw expression RFC.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/throw_expression
Voting closes on April 19th, 2020.
Regards,
Ilija
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
10 matches
Mail list logo
