Hi Ilija, On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 11:53, Ilija Tovilo <tovilo.il...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I did respond to that e-mail but probably got classified as spam as > were the other e-mails I sent with that address. This was my response: > > > I've thought about this some more. There is a reasonable way to recognize > > this, namely to check if the expression after the throw keyword is of type > > ZEND_AST_OR or ZEND_AST_AND. The expression above will fail with this > > message (given that $condition is false):
fyi your emails are not marked as spam for me any more. The issue is that as your words are written, it is not possible for me to understand exactly what you mean. "There is a reasonable way to recognize this" could mean: * This has been done and is part of the implementation people are voting on. * This could be done and you think it can be done trivially so doesn't need to be part of the RFC. * This could be done, but you're not sure how it could be done and people are voting on it without being part of the implementation. Please could you say whether this issue has been fixed or whether it still needs fixing. The RFC as currently stands hasn't been updated since it was initially put to discussion. Which means that anyone just reading the RFC won't be aware of this issue that was brought up during the discussion. cheers Dan Ack -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
