Hi Nikita > The only thing wrong here is calling this an "exception to the rule" in the > RFC. This is completely standard and expected behavior given the specified > precedence. It is in the nature of precedence that there will always be cases > where the use of () is required, and this is one of them.
I can see how that statement could be confusing. What I meant was this: > This isn't a problem because generally throw should be the last operator ... > ... > One exception to this rule ... As in, this is the only example I could think of where throw would be used between two other expressions. Not that the precedence behaves differently than in any other case. I'll rephrase that sentence. Regards, Ilija -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
