Hi,
According to voting result, phpng was merged into master and the version
number was bumped to 7.0.0-dev.
Thanks to contributors, testers, bloggers, voters and everyone evolved :)
Thanks. Dmitry.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> I opened the voting on the phpng RFC:
>
Le 06/08/2014 14:36, Zeev Suraski a écrit :
I opened the voting on the phpng RFC:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/phpng#vote
Voting ends on Thursday, August 14th.
After speaking with other members of AFUP (French user-group) about this
RFC, here's a short summary of our thoughts:
The idea of (
This is a just a reminder that voting ends on Thursday, August 14th.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Aug 7, 2014 8:13 AM, "Christian Stoller" wrote:
>
> From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
> > On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6 Aug 2014, at 14:26, Pierre Joye wrote:
> >>
> >>> For the exts I tried while I was testing/fixing phpng a couple of
> >>>
From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>>
>> On 6 Aug 2014, at 14:26, Pierre Joye wrote:
>>
>>> For the exts I tried while I was testing/fixing phpng a couple of
>>> weeks ago, I'd to say that maintaining the same code base for phpn
; between
> > PHP 5.x and PHPNG. Dmitry - please correct me if I'm wrong...
> >
> > Zeev
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Dan Ackroyd [mailto:dan...@basereality.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 4:01 PM
> >>
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Dan Ackroyd
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Zeev,
>>
>> >I have no problem with changing this
>> >habit, but I do have an issue with changing it retroactively for a
>> >particular vote.
>>
>> Agreed, changing rules ret
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
> Hi Zeev,
>
> >I have no problem with changing this
> >habit, but I do have an issue with changing it retroactively for a
> >particular vote.
>
> Agreed, changing rules retroactively is bad. Considering improving
> practices for the future is go
ckroyd [mailto:dan...@basereality.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 4:01 PM
>> To: Zeev Suraski
>> Cc: PHP internals
>> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Move the phpng branch to master
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It would be good if people announced that they were
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
> On 6 Aug 2014, at 14:26, Pierre Joye wrote:
>
>> For the exts I tried while I was testing/fixing phpng a couple of
>> weeks ago, I'd to say that maintaining the same code base for phpng
>> and 5.x is simply too hard, way too many APIs chang
On 6 Aug 2014, at 14:26, Pierre Joye wrote:
> For the exts I tried while I was testing/fixing phpng a couple of
> weeks ago, I'd to say that maintaining the same code base for phpng
> and 5.x is simply too hard, way too many APIs changes, many of them
> cannot be detected at compile time, introd
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
>> Dan,
>>
>> Votes area almost never pre-announced. I have no problem with changing
>> this
>> habit, but I do have an issue with changing it retroactively for a
>> particular vote.
>>
>
On 06/08/14 14:11, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> I believe it's impractical to keep shared codebases for extensions between
> PHP 5.x and PHPNG. Dmitry - please correct me if I'm wrong...
Do we actually have a list of what is NOT going to work once this
happens? I am still not in a position to test phpng
s. Dmitry.
>
> Zeev
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dan Ackroyd [mailto:dan...@basereality.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 4:01 PM
> > To: Zeev Suraski
> > Cc: PHP internals
> > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Move the phpng branch to
> -Original Message-
> From: Derick Rethans [mailto:der...@php.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 3:57 PM
> To: Dmitry Stogov
> Cc: Andrea Faulds; Zeev Suraski; PHP internals
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Move the phpng branch to master
>
> That's ok - h
sereality.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 4:01 PM
> To: Zeev Suraski
> Cc: PHP internals
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Move the phpng branch to master
>
> Hi,
>
> It would be good if people announced that they were going to open things
> to
> vote with a warni
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> Fully agree with Andrea. I don't think there's a point in debating the
> majority question to no end, because ultimately, it's open for
> interpretation. I feel very, very confident about my interpretation - for
> reasons I explained already
Hi,
It would be good if people announced that they were going to open
things to vote with a warning, rather than just throwing the voting
open.
The RFC is nowhere complete in it's details for people to make
rational decisions. e.g. the section on 'RFC impact' has this for the
impact on extensions
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrea Faulds [mailto:a...@ajf.me]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 3:51 PM
> To: Jonny Stirling
> Cc: Zeev Suraski; PHP internals
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Move the phpng branch to master
>
>
> On 6 Aug 2014, at 13:47, Jon
On Wed, 6 Aug 2014, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
> > On 6 Aug 2014, at 13:36, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> >
> > > I opened the voting on the phpng RFC:
> > >
> > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/phpng#vote
> > >
> > > Voting ends on Thursday, August 14th.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
> On 6 Aug 2014, at 13:36, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
> > I opened the voting on the phpng RFC:
> >
> >
> >
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/phpng#vote
> >
> >
> >
> > Voting ends on Thursday, August 14th.
>
> I voted Yes, but I have to ask: Is there
Hi Andrea,
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
> On 6 Aug 2014, at 13:36, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
> > I opened the voting on the phpng RFC:
> >
> >
> >
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/phpng#vote
> >
> >
> >
> > Voting ends on Thursday, August 14th.
>
> I voted Yes, but I have to
On 6 Aug 2014, at 13:47, Jonny Stirling wrote:
> I love how you've just completely ignored any previous discussion around
> the required majority issue.
Has it really been *ignored*? Just because someone wants something doesn’t mean
you have to give it.
Under Zeev’s (and as it so happens, my)
hi Zeev,
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
> On 6 Aug 2014, at 13:36, Zeev Suraski wrote:
>
>> I opened the voting on the phpng RFC:
>>
>>
>>
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/phpng#vote
>>
>>
>>
>> Voting ends on Thursday, August 14th.
>
> I voted Yes, but I have to ask: Is there
Zeev,
I love how you've just completely ignored any previous discussion around
the required majority issue. It's is certainly enlightening that questions
specifically directed at you in multiple threads have gone unanswered when
trying to work out which is actually required. Instead, you just take
On 6 Aug 2014, at 13:36, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> I opened the voting on the phpng RFC:
>
>
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/phpng#vote
>
>
>
> Voting ends on Thursday, August 14th.
I voted Yes, but I have to ask: Is there anything in master that’s not in
phpng, i.e., is it completely up-to-dat
I opened the voting on the phpng RFC:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/phpng#vote
Voting ends on Thursday, August 14th.
Please vote!
Zeev
27 matches
Mail list logo
