> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrea Faulds [mailto:a...@ajf.me] > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 3:51 PM > To: Jonny Stirling > Cc: Zeev Suraski; PHP internals > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Move the phpng branch to master > > > On 6 Aug 2014, at 13:47, Jonny Stirling <phoe...@jonstirling.co.uk> wrote: > > > I love how you've just completely ignored any previous discussion > > around the required majority issue. > > Has it really been *ignored*? Just because someone wants something doesn't > mean you have to give it. > > Under Zeev's (and as it so happens, my) interpretation of the voting process > RFC, this does not need a 2/3 majority. phpng is not a language change, it is an > implementation detail.
Fully agree with Andrea. I don't think there's a point in debating the majority question to no end, because ultimately, it's open for interpretation. I feel very, very confident about my interpretation - for reasons I explained already. I didn't ignore the feedback, I disagreed with it. > Now, could Zeev make it have a 2/3 majority to be less controversial? Sure, > but he doesn't have to. I still stand by my original comment - that I hope and believe this RFC will get well over 2/3 - but that it technically only requires a simple majority. Zeev -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
