On 6 Aug 2014, at 13:47, Jonny Stirling <phoe...@jonstirling.co.uk> wrote:
> I love how you've just completely ignored any previous discussion around > the required majority issue. Has it really been *ignored*? Just because someone wants something doesn’t mean you have to give it. Under Zeev’s (and as it so happens, my) interpretation of the voting process RFC, this does not need a 2/3 majority. phpng is not a language change, it is an implementation detail. Now, could Zeev make it have a 2/3 majority to be less controversial? Sure, but he doesn’t have to. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
