On Mar 3, 2008, at 2:48 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!
It is clearer but it is not a problem. New features may introduce new
dependencies. Having a dependency on libicu while we introduce intl
and other features related to unicode or i18n. I would agree if we
were talking about 5.2.x.
pe
Michael Rasmussen wrote:
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:52:13 -0400, Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote:
Not if you think the improvements will break the code base because you
don't have time to do sufficient testing. I would prefer to avoid
regressions in minor releases and would like to use the lon
Sara Golemon wrote:
Originally George and Wez were going to be writing this book (and may yet do
their own version -- that's up to them). Due to innocuous reasons that I
can probably talk about but won't to be on the safe side, I wound up taking
over the project (and the ISBN number along with
Johannes Schlueter wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 20:48, Marco wrote:
Is there a way from within the embedded system to destroy all created
variables so that the environment is the same as when it was started or do
we need to shutdown the embedded engine and start it up again?
Andrew Mather wrote:
i)a walkthrough of the exact steps + sample code to write an extension
without
requiring re-compilation of Php and without access to Php source code
ii) as above but with access to Php source code
You're clearly missing the -devel RPM that installs the ne
Just as a reminder to all interested parties: the submission deadline
for 2006 O'Reilly Open Source Convention is coming to a close. All
submissions must be in by Monday, February 13th 23:59 PST to be
considered. Proposals can be submitted online at
http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2006
me 3.
goto is good.
Wez Furlong wrote:
me also
On 11/27/05, Edin Kadribasic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
If it comes down to count of +1/-1 about this feature, I am +1 for
unrestricted forward/backward jumps and -1 for restricted version.
I agree wi
Ian P. Christian wrote:
On Sunday 20 November 2005 22:27, Ian P. Christian wrote:
If this change included a simple sed command that could be applied to code
to fix 'legacy' code
Sorry, should have included this...
For example:
$ cat test
$ sed -e 's/$\([a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*\){\(
Oliver Grätz wrote:
Do you read the posts you're commenting on?
I said there _were_ (there are not anymore) problems with PDO betas on
_Windows_ systems (that was a PECL build for PHP 5.0.3). This was not a
complaint on anything and I didn't complain then because it was beta and
not meant to be
On Oct 7, 2005, at 5:41 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
George Schlossnagle wrote:
What is wrong with PHP 5.1? People don't *have* to upgrade to the
unicode enabled PHP if they don't want to. And it would probably be
"nice" to have that mode for so
On Oct 7, 2005, at 5:05 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Which is why we need the unicode=off switch. I don't think there
is any
way we can make Unicode PHP as fast as non-Unicode PHP. For
people who
need Unicode support, Unicode PHP will be faster an
On Oct 4, 2005, at 11:50 AM, Tim Nufire wrote:
Ramus,
Thanks for the response. Unfortunately, I don't have any great
ideas on how to patch this and for now have just stopped using
gzinflate :-/ Is there a way to reopen bug 30153? That description
of this issue is pretty good and, even if
On Sep 28, 2005, at 12:46 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, George Schlossnagle wrote:
Carrying on the stupid questions: Is it possible to make a better
'guess' in
the case that there are name-collisions or missing names and no
ini setting is
set? Perhaps some
On Sep 28, 2005, at 8:54 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Steph wrote:
This is probably a stupid question, but why isn't there a default
setting?
And why can't the missing default setting be set by the system date
() data?
That's exactly what I was trying to do, except th
On Sep 15, 2005, at 9:21 AM, Leigh Makewell wrote:
If you don't know why it's wrong to tell them they are stupid, and
can't be bother spending an extra 10 seconds formulating a
respectable response instead, then you are the wrong person for the
job.
A cursory survey of the bugs db sugge
On Sep 15, 2005, at 7:25 AM, Jani Taskinen wrote:
I can count the times I've been thanked personally with one hand.
Most of the time people send me hate email. :)
Thank you, Jani, for all the (mostly) thankless work.
George
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To
On Aug 29, 2005, at 2:38 PM, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
Hi,
I am searching for some evidence in the PHP source code that the
possibility of omitting the closing PHP tag is absolutely intentional,
and in fact part of the language syntax, and therefore it is going
to be
supported indefinitely. Diggi
On Aug 22, 2005, at 4:02 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, George Schlossnagle wrote:
I'm talking about allowing type hints to be trappable by users,
without
complicating them with exceptions. I'm proposing a new error
level, which
behaves like E_ERROR, except
On Aug 22, 2005, at 3:50 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 20:53 22/08/2005, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> So in that case, the implementation in zend_error_cb() should
simply call
> the user error handler if it's available, or treat it as if it's
E_ERROR if
> there is no user error handler.
Isn't an
] http://www.zend.com/ +972-3-6139665 ext.115
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
George Schlossnagle
-- Vice President of Engineering
-- OmniTI Computer Consulting
-- http://www.omniti.com
On Aug 18, 2005, at 10:43 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Or, alternatively, have a separate arrays:
["title"]=>
array(2) {
[0] => string(6) "Title1"
[1] => string(6) "Title2"
}
["media:title"]=>string(11) "Media Title"
The latter is actually what I was (naiively) expecting.
I thi
On Aug 15, 2005, at 2:52 PM, sebastian wrote:
W4: Better lambda/anonymous functions and debugging for them.
Consider Perl's anonymous functions which disappear as the
references to them disappear. See the create_function() docs for
notes about "memory leaks."
Well, Perl subroutines are
On Aug 15, 2005, at 11:52 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
That's exactly what I was saying (in another part of the email).
It doesn't work in reverse order though - being on one of these
lists does usually mean that the developer is more 'hardcore' than
others.
Have you seen Harold and Kumar G
On Aug 15, 2005, at 11:38 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
(*) Based on the fact php-general@ has 787 subscribers and current
estimates at the amount of PHP developers worldwide range between
500,000 to 2,000,000 developers. I actually got the opening number
wrong - it's 99.84%, not 98.5%. Sorry.
On Aug 15, 2005, at 10:18 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
I agree that ensuring a migration
path is critical. Wez and I were discussing this in the car this
morning, and short of magic_quoutes_runtime, they all seemed like
they were straightforward to handle through am include (except for
the paramete
On Aug 15, 2005, at 2:29 AM, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, George Schlossnagle wrote:
On Aug 14, 2005, at 3:37 PM, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
If apc comes bundled then it includes apc_store() and apc_fetch
() this
is pretty much
On Aug 15, 2005, at 5:05 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
That's an excellent response. If one percent of the energy put
into the 'yay parade' and the 'let's break this too!' parade were
invested in coming up with a clean upgrade path, I wouldn't have
had to write the response I wrote.
Would i
On Aug 14, 2005, at 3:37 PM, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
If apc comes bundled then it includes apc_store() and apc_fetch()
this
is pretty much $_MEMORY with a few tweaks.
Yes, but that is restricted to one server installations.
I need such a
On Aug 14, 2005, at 1:24 PM, Al Baker wrote:
An embedded opcode cache I think is also essential and the surrounding
$_MEMORY sounds perfect to me. All Java guys (yeah I know PHP !=
Java)
say PHP isn't ready for the enterprise because it can't share
information between processes other than ar
On Aug 14, 2005, at 1:08 PM, Lukas Smith wrote:
As for removing register globals, a simple auto prepend will get
you register globals back, same goes for magic quotes. But moving
this stuff into userland will force people to take another hard
look at their code.
Also a good thing for PH
On Aug 13, 2005, at 9:06 PM, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, George Schlossnagle wrote:
On Aug 13, 2005, at 5:08 AM, Ondrej Ivani wrote:
9. Shared memory storage for variables with transparent access.
(superglobal array?)
-1. This is hard to make consistent across all
On Aug 13, 2005, at 5:57 PM, Andrey Hristov wrote:
George Schlossnagle wrote:
On Aug 13, 2005, at 5:49 PM, Andrey Hristov wrote:
George Schlossnagle wrote:
On Aug 13, 2005, at 11:46 AM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
* Christian Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
9. Named
On Aug 13, 2005, at 5:49 PM, Andrey Hristov wrote:
George Schlossnagle wrote:
On Aug 13, 2005, at 11:46 AM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
* Christian Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
9. Named parameters. Preferred way would be via array()-less array
collation as we are al
On Aug 13, 2005, at 11:46 AM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
* Christian Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
9. Named parameters. Preferred way would be via array()-less array
collation as we are already using this in our production system ;-) :
foo('id' => 42, 'name' => "foo");
+1 -- this is
On Aug 13, 2005, at 3:21 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, George Schlossnagle wrote:
Good. That function would be evil (imho). Given that you can't
access
super-globals as variable-variables, I think that having to really
get at
_RAW_GET[] will make it much
On Aug 13, 2005, at 8:19 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, steve roussey wrote:
4. Include an opcode cache by default. A lot of work has gone into
pecl/apc recently, but I am not hung up on which one goes in.
I have no karma to +1, but would if I could. It would be wonder
On Aug 13, 2005, at 8:14 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, George Schlossnagle wrote:
I wrote up the following spec for this extension:
http://files.derickrethans.nl/filter_extension.html
Where's the part about an application swapping back for the raw
arrays (as
oppos
On Aug 13, 2005, at 5:08 AM, Ondrej Ivanič wrote:
9. Shared memory storage for variables with transparent access.
(superglobal array?)
-1. This is hard to make consistent across all platforms, and will
break instantly when you go past 1 machine, making it confusing and
of marginal usag
On Aug 13, 2005, at 2:29 AM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
Marcus Boerger wrote:
9. __toString) everywhere, but i already said i'll take care of
that unless
i am being held back. So now go for that or live with the fact
that php is
meant to generate html pages which is text output. Thus sooner o
On Aug 12, 2005, at 2:19 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, George Schlossnagle wrote:
3. Add input filter extension which will include a mechanism for
application developers to very easily turn it off which would
swap
the raw GPC arrays back in case the site had it
On Aug 12, 2005, at 1:48 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Since we are breaking a lot of stuff in 6.0, at least with
Unicode_semantics=On I am wondering if it may not be time to break
some
more stuff and do a bit of spring cleaning. It would mean many apps
would need some work to work on PHP 6, bu
On Aug 10, 2005, at 10:30 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Yeah, print/echo was just a way of describing the underlying output
stuff. It wasn't meant to be taken literally.
Given the __toString fiasco, it's understandable that this would be
confusing though.
George
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runti
evelopment Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
George Schlossnagle
-- Vice President of Engineering
-- OmniTI Computer Consulting
-- http://www.omniti.com
On Aug 9, 2005, at 3:25 PM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I think Unicode warrants a major version. I'd go with PHP 6 and aim
to release it before Perl 6 :)
From judging by a Perl 6 talk we attended at OSCON, that might
actually be a realistic goal.
I think that's more than a 'might'.
George
--
P
On Aug 9, 2005, at 3:12 PM, steve roussey wrote:
On 8/8/05, Rasmus Lerdorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
3. Problems with thread-safety of modules
You missed the most serious one. Thread safety problems in random
libraries you link in and we have absolutely no control over those.
OK, I am
On Aug 9, 2005, at 5:56 AM, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 10:15:15 +0200 (CEST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Derick Rethans) wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote:
This technique is already frequently used to cope with lazy
loaded code, which even with cached code compile
On Jul 28, 2005, at 9:49 AM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
sure: eval('file_get_contents("http://evil.org";);');
Ok, but there is nothing (allow_url_fopen does not work here)
preventing me from doing similar via:
$fp = fsockopen("evil.org", 80);
$fp = fwrite($fp, "GET /evil_code.txt HTTP/1.0\
On Jul 28, 2005, at 9:28 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 04:21 PM 7/28/2005, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 01:50 AM 7/28/2005, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
Are you therefore saying SOAP support should be 100% diabled when
allow_url_fopen is off?
SOAP is not disabled, simply pr
On Jul 28, 2005, at 9:21 AM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 01:50 AM 7/28/2005, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
Are you therefore saying SOAP support should be 100% diabled when
allow_url_fopen is off?
SOAP is not disabled, simply prevented from querying remote data
sources di
On Jul 28, 2005, at 9:10 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 01:50 AM 7/28/2005, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
Are you therefore saying SOAP support should be 100% diabled when
allow_url_fopen is off?
SOAP is not disabled, simply prevented from querying remote data
sources directly.
What exactly ca
On Jul 18, 2005, at 10:30 AM, Andrew Yochum wrote:
On Jul 18, 2005, at 10:15 AM, George Schlossnagle wrote:
Drop-in replacements are evil. If you want to do this, you should
just create a new function that does what you need to do and name
it differently. If you're dead-set on do
to prepare the patch?
--
.''`.Piotr Roszatycki, Netia SA
: :' :mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `' mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
George Schlossnagle
-- Vice Pre
On Jul 7, 2005, at 7:56 PM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
It would look the following:
$timeZone->getName();
vs.
date_timezone_get($date);
$date->getOffset();
vs.
date_offset_get($date);
Personally, unrelated to OO I think it's a nicer and cleaner way of
exposing such an API. It would also make it e
On Jun 16, 2005, at 10:15 PM, boots wrote:
These answers make me feel as if maybe just a little bit you guys are
looking down your nose at me without really considering the basis of
the issue I am trying to raise. I know the tools well enough to use
E_ALL -- thanks. I'm concerned about end user
On Jun 16, 2005, at 2:50 PM, boots wrote:
--- Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You missed the point of E_STRICT. I introduced it as an E_PEDANTIC.
That was the whole idea. To be pedantic about code that works, not
to warn about code that doesn't work (which is for higher warning
leve
On Jun 9, 2005, at 6:51 PM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Hi,
Finally catching up with all the million comments. Definitely a way
to get distracted from real work :)
I don't want to get distracted from what I consider should be the
main objective and bigger issues than yes to one or another featur
On Jun 7, 2005, at 8:55 AM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
GS>> b) a problem that self-rectifies at the end of the request (as
per
GS>>Derick's discussion).
So you basically is saying "let's ignore memory leaks".
Well, point a) implied that it's a solvable problem, at least as much
as it is w
On Jun 7, 2005, at 8:46 AM, Sascha Schumann wrote:
As for my own example, many state machines make extensive use of
goto to avoid recursive calls.
Goto is not required for that. State machines such as the
following
You conveniently ignored the part of my mail where I noted that
On Jun 7, 2005, at 8:43 AM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
GS>>Perl's goto specifically forbids jumping into control
structures that
GS>>require intialization (for instance, foreach()). That seems
like a
GS>>sensible limitation to me.
jumping out is no good either.
Because of the memory issu
On Jun 7, 2005, at 8:25 AM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
GB>>control structures are not useful. This is not the case in PHP. A
GB>>simple example in the manual showing proper usage of break/
continue
GB>>and warning to only use goto as a last resort would be
sufficient for
GB>>discouraging ne
On Jun 7, 2005, at 8:12 AM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
GS>>And yet it exists and people use it productively - so you've
GS>>successfully undermined your own argument (and Perl's goto is
far more
GS>>flexible|evil than the one proposed for PHP).
Care to give example where it is really needed a
On Jun 7, 2005, at 8:08 AM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
AH>>Does C suffer from having goto?
Does C suffer from being able to freely convert any type to any and
access
any memory location? Should we add these features too?
Funny, I was just talking with Andi about that at dinner the other
On Jun 7, 2005, at 8:00 AM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
GS>>I don't think I've ever heard Perl or C maligned on the basis
of their
GS>>support for goto. Perhaps I just travel in the wrong circles.
I didn't ever saw any need in Perl goto - except for goto&
construct which
isn't goto at all.
On Jun 7, 2005, at 7:37 AM, Nelson Menezes wrote:
Goto is a plainly bad idea. Yes it has its uses, but 99% of
the time it would just be completely, mercilessly, utterly abused.
Its not good or bad, just a language construct. Its how you use it.
I agree. I just think it will be used badly
On Jun 6, 2005, at 1:46 PM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
George Schlossnagle wrote:
Why do you need to use OO to use exceptions?
Maybe "throw new Exception;" is already too much OO for somebody's
mother because you create a new object of the Exception class here.
I'
On Jun 6, 2005, at 9:28 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
MM>>Exceptions ? No thank you, even worse then continue/break..
Why is it worse? That's something that I don't understand - why
people
think exceptions, which have clear structured mechanism of
On Jun 6, 2005, at 3:09 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Jani Taskinen wrote:
And the much needed goto for the next one (5.2/5.5/6.0 or
whatever it
will be) ?
So +1 from me. (wasn't there a patch for this already somewhere?)
For me too: +1.
+1 here as well.
George
--
On May 30, 2005, at 7:15 PM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Not sure who you're talking to but I know a large amount of
companies (some of them huge) who have based their development on
PHP 5.
Can you share (or guess at) the skew of companies migrating existing
apps from PHP4 to PHP5 versus the num
On May 17, 2005, at 8:04 AM, Blake Matheny wrote:
Is there anything incorrect/wrong with the solution I proposed? I
realize that a custom extension would also work, but there are
several advantages to doing it the way I implemented it
- No need to add an extension every time you upgrade PHP
Yo
On May 16, 2005, at 3:16 PM, Blake Matheny wrote:
Attached is a small patch that allows for a custom error handler to
be used instead of php_log_err. This is useful for custom logging
of error types that can't be handled with a user-space error
handler (such as E_ERROR, E_PARSE, etc.).
In or
On May 13, 2005, at 5:29 PM, Jared Williams wrote:
While hacking on a PHPDoc -> WSDL generator, I ran into an
annoying limitation in the dom extension: you can't add a
namespace to a dom document unless you have an element in
that namespace. Why might you want to do this? Well, a
common thing is
ow this isn't part of the Dom spec, but it's incredibly useful.
Does anyone (Rob, Chegru) mind me adding it to HEAD?
George
George Schlossnagle
-- Vice President of Engineering
-- OmniTI Computer Consulting
-- http://www.omniti.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Leonardo Pedretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I would like (for code cleanliness purposes) to make 'new' return a
reference to an already created object under certain circumstances without
using a factory, is it possible?
A number of months
On Apr 18, 2005, at 8:26 AM, Wez Furlong wrote:
From a technical viewpoint, how do these attributes affect the class?
Are they simply no-ops that are tagged and made available via the
reflection API? How does this really help improve PHP? I know it
sounds cool, but so does recording phpdoc commen
On Feb 15, 2005, at 2:57 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
Christian Schneider wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
PHP has long suffered from poor implementations of some of the DB
extensions and good implementations of others. PDO is a good
opportunity to unify the extensions and have a common code base so
that b
On Feb 15, 2005, at 1:36 AM, D.Walsh wrote:
libxzml2 is a rather simple install so upgrading it in the Mac world
is a simple build however, those dependent on RPM's, perhaps you
should consider something that is more commonly found.
If at all possible, I should not have to upgrade the libraries t
I know this concept looks a bit strange but just wanted to hear
oppinions from the experts... :)
This concept looks strange (and non-standard - do any other languages
support this semantic?). It doesn't save you much typing either.
George
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
On Feb 12, 2005, at 5:01 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
Derick Rethans wrote:
1. ADOdb has *nothing* to do with the PHP project
It would not exist without it.
No reason why it could not be part.
Plenty of things couldn't exist without PHP. That doesn't mean that
PHP needs to hold still for their sake, o
On Feb 12, 2005, at 11:35 AM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I think the right way to implement this is in a development tools.
There is other data that needs to be gathered for creating a WSDL file
such as URI, authentication (if required) etc.
Seems silly to have to use a development tool to do this. On
On Feb 11, 2005, at 2:25 AM, Markus Fischer wrote:
Sara Golemon wrote:
What would happen to the instanciated objects?
Only allowing class unloading for classes that have no instantiated
objects would be an option.
And how would you know if it'd been instantiated? Even if you
recursively looped th
On Feb 11, 2005, at 3:09 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
;
I really need the statement call callback for single stepping through
code.
Seconded. I use something similar. The statement call is really
useful. The fcall_(begin|end) hooks I never use though.
George
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Develo
On Feb 9, 2005, at 7:45 PM, Marc Richards wrote:
Wez Furlong wrote:
You may have noticed my "drive-by release" of various different PDO
packages tonight/this morning.
This is stage one of the "PDO push".
Are there plans for a mysqli driver for PDO? I searched around but I
couldn't seem to find an
On Feb 9, 2005, at 10:57 AM, Sara Golemon wrote:
Is it possible to intercept a function call (user
space or built-in) in the Zend Engine and execute user
space code before/after the function call?
Yes, you can do this by way of a Zend extension (not a PHP extension
mind
you).
The parts of Zend/ze
Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
George Schlossnagle
-- Prinicipal Consultant
-- OmniTI Computer Consulting
-- http://www.omniti.com
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Feb 8, 2005, at 1:16 AM, Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
Hehe... I do hope this is a joke (it would seem rather
closed-minded, otherwise). I don't think anybody would have
bothered if anyone posted PHP code on
e.g. comp.lang.c++(.moderated), in order
On Feb 6, 2005, at 6:51 PM, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
On Sunday, Feb 6, 2005, at 23:07 Europe/Copenhagen, George
Schlossnagle wrote:
I disagree. The fact that XSS attacks remain one of the largest
issues plaguing large so-called enterprise sites points to data
validation being a hard thing to
On Feb 6, 2005, at 2:14 PM, Christian Schneider wrote:
Benj Carson wrote:
My opinion may not carry any weight here, as I'm just a user of PHP,
but this discussion has given me a few ideas. As Ron and Val (and
others) have pointed out, there's no way for PHP to know how an
*input* value is going
On Feb 6, 2005, at 5:02 PM, David Zülke wrote:
Guys, I'm sure I'll annoy the heck out of some on this list, but
there's
still the question whether PHP should prevent any case of dumbness on
the
developer side. Whatever we do, some developers out there will be way
more
idiotic than we can ever im
On Feb 3, 2005, at 5:51 PM, Terje Slettebø wrote:
From: "George Schlossnagle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By the way, I have your book ("Advanced PHP Programming"), which I
found
very good. :) I've also recently got Andi Gutmans, Stig S. Bakken and
Derick
Rethans book, &
On Feb 3, 2005, at 1:58 PM, Terje Slettebø wrote:
Hm, I'm surprised by this response from someone who's name I recognise
as an
active PHP contributor. The answer strikes me as either arrogant and/or
ignorant (note: I'm not saying you are that, but that's how the reply
comes
across, given what wha
On Feb 1, 2005, at 5:36 PM, Andi Gutmans wrote:
When you mean support, basically it's just adding
serialize/unserialize callbacks right? Doesn't mean all extensions
need to implement them?
Those can be 'bugfixes' in point releases?
George
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
T
On Feb 1, 2005, at 3:20 PM, Stephan Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
Andi Gutmans schrieb:
I believe both PDO and Date should be included in the default distro.
I'd like to see xmlreader be bundled as well. It's fast, easy to use
and still very powerful.
+1
George
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mail
On Dec 30, 2004, at 2:23 PM, Hans Zaunere wrote:
That has nothing to do with Apache2 and has been available for Apache1
for years. It just isn't a very popular feature. See the
apache_hooks
code.
I know apache_hooks but after discussion with George and others, I
wouldn't feel comfortable recomme
ubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
George Schlossnagle
-- Prinicipal Consultant
-- OmniTI Computer Consulting
-- http://www.omniti.com
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Dec 20, 2004, at 8:44 PM, Gareth Ardron wrote:
George Schlossnagle wrote:
At some point you'll have to face it: Apache 2 is becoming a popular
"platform". It's obviously up to you at what point you'll consider
this important enough to spend time on it but a reality
On Dec 20, 2004, at 8:05 PM, Christian Schneider wrote:
Derick Rethans wrote:
Why would we (as PHP developers) invest time in something while the
current version provides us with all we need?
Because more and more people want to run Apache 2 for different
reasons?
According to your argument PHP w
On Dec 7, 2004, at 10:45 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
Did we ever came to the conclusion whether we should put this patch
into
CVS. AFAIK everybody agreed with it...
That's what I recall as well.
George
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/
On Oct 22, 2004, at 5:05 PM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
Derick Rethans wrote:
For that the granularity is not good enough though.
Ideally we'd have gettimeofday() cached, but looking @ the code it is
called on by lcg code and then only on MINIT. So we'd need an "extra"
syscall to provide this, I am
On Oct 22, 2004, at 4:43 PM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
The question is what would be the best way to provide this information
within the script. The two alternatives are: adding a new function to
get this info or storing this data inside $_SERVER.
What do you think?
$_SERVER['request_time']
George
On Oct 21, 2004, at 7:30 PM, Frank M. Kromann wrote:
Aside from that, PDO is very usable for the most common data access
patterns that you are likely to use in PHP.
Driver wise, we have a nice collection. The only major driver that we
are missing is mysql 4.x (we have 3.x).
If namesake-Georg doesn
1 - 100 of 330 matches
Mail list logo
