On 6/23/08, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> > why would anyone need that?
> >
>
> To use function that does use static without dependence on in which context
> if was called (or, explaining it other way, when your chain of inheritance
> serves multiple purposes):
>
> cla
On Monday 23 June 2008 3:21:54 pm Lars Strojny wrote:
> Hi Stas,
>
> Am Montag, den 23.06.2008, 09:57 -0700 schrieb Stanislav Malyshev:
> [...]
>
> > Why having parent:: at all then? You could always use the class name,
> > right? But for some reason we do have parent:: - and that reason is
> > tha
Pierre Joye wrote:
As testing has_xxx at runtime looks shiny and powerful, I don't think
it is worth the pain.
What pain?
Greg
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Steph Fox wrote:
Hi Pierre,
OK, I got back to the rest of your email now (caffeine always helps, eh).
I'm not sure it makes sense to have the ssl optional features enabled
but not ext/openssl. Or to say it better, I don't see the gain. What
is the gain besides being able to say: "heh you can
Hi Stas,
Am Montag, den 23.06.2008, 10:56 -0700 schrieb Stanislav Malyshev:
> What do you think?
I really love that idea. Real Functors¹ in PHP, great!
1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function_object
cu, Lars
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Hi Stas,
Am Montag, den 23.06.2008, 09:57 -0700 schrieb Stanislav Malyshev:
[...]
> Why having parent:: at all then? You could always use the class name,
> right? But for some reason we do have parent:: - and that reason is
> that using explicit class name is not a good style in this context, it
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> It seems natural to think of LSB as a language feature, and so it
>> doesn't feel right to have it partly implemented as a keyword, and
>> then fix the problematic part as function.
>
> There's nothing
Hi!
Hmm, seems like a good idea. If nobody objects in the next few days,
I'll rewrite my patch to use objects instead of resources. What class
name do you suggest?
While we are at it maybe even having special standard handler
(__invoke?) that could be also used by objects created by reflectio
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Milan Babuskov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pierre Joye wrote:
if nobody with C hacking skills is feeling sufficient pain over this,
the
assumption is that the pool of users is too small or the pain is too
small.
>>>
>>> sorry for such late
Hi!
Now, when we're at it, my experience with MSVC and Windows command line
tools is almost none. I tried to build PHP 5.3 with it, but the guide on
PHP website has some errors (some stuff just isn't where it says it is,
and it seems some steps are skipped. Also, the 'configure' script used
f
Hi!
why would anyone need that?
To use function that does use static without dependence on in which
context if was called (or, explaining it other way, when your chain of
inheritance serves multiple purposes):
class ActiveRecord {
static function getRow($condition) {
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> if (!PHAR_G(has_zlib)) ...
>
> Pierre, you'd still need to test for them at runtime whether they were
> listed as a soft dependency or not!
No, not if they are not soft dependencies, this is what is done in 99%
of the php e
if (!PHAR_G(has_zlib)) ...
Pierre, you'd still need to test for them at runtime whether they were
listed as a soft dependency or not!
- Steph
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> My main question now is why don't you actually reflect the (optional)
>> dependencies? bz2 and zlib compression available will not be available
>> if bz2 or zlib is not present, same for openssl.
>
> What do you mean? In conf
Hi!
It seems natural to think of LSB as a language feature, and so it
doesn't feel right to have it partly implemented as a keyword, and
then fix the problematic part as function.
There's nothing wrong with functions - call_user_* are functions too,
and func_get_args(), etc.
We already see
Pierre,
I finally took a look at why phar is not built shared as all other
extension. It seems to force it only to be able to be run with no dep
but still uses them if they are lately added (given that phar is now
built statically, that makes little sense). But in fact, it does have
deps agains
Pierre Joye wrote:
if nobody with C hacking skills is feeling sufficient pain over this, the
assumption is that the pool of users is too small or the pain is too small.
sorry for such late reply, but I just joined this group. I'm very interested
in Firebird's future in PHP and I have C skills.
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We can sign and verify OpenSSL signatures without ext/openssl if we have the
> library dependency. In other words, this (with the module checks in util.c
> commented out) works fine:
I finally took a look at why phar is
Hey Pierre,
--enable-phar-ssl and do (not tested but it gives the idea):
if (PHP_PHAR_SSL == "yes") {
ADD_EXTENSION_DEP("phar", "openssl", true);
} else {
Erm... no, you've definitely missed the point. ADD_EXTENSION_DEP() only
works in one of the four possible scenarios, and that one
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Milan Babuskov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
>>
>> if nobody with C hacking skills is feeling sufficient pain over this, the
>> assumption is that the pool of users is too small or the pain is too small.
>
> Hi,
>
> sorry for such late reply,
On 23.06.2008, at 14:54, Milan Babuskov wrote:
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
if nobody with C hacking skills is feeling sufficient pain over
this, the assumption is that the pool of users is too small or the
pain is too small.
sorry for such late reply, but I just joined this group. I'm very
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
if nobody with C hacking skills is feeling sufficient pain over this,
the assumption is that the pool of users is too small or the pain is too
small.
Hi,
sorry for such late reply, but I just joined this group. I'm very
interested in Firebird's future in PHP and I ha
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 2:16 AM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and the same is not true of parent::? besides which I doubt any same code
> would actually break if the semantics of self:: changed, much less than
> if parent:: changed at any rate.
>
The behavior of the parent:: as it rel
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're missing that Windows users don't tend to roll their own PHP. They
> tend to pick and choose their extensions.
I still miss your point here, I was only talking about bins releases
for windows.
> At present, if someone
Hi Pierre,
OK, I got back to the rest of your email now (caffeine always helps, eh).
I'm not sure it makes sense to have the ssl optional features enabled
but not ext/openssl. Or to say it better, I don't see the gain. What
is the gain besides being able to say: "heh you can use the ssl
featur
Hi Martin,
Would --with-openssl imply --enable-phar-ssl then? Sounds like a good
idea to me.
It certainly could... but what about distro builds?
- Steph
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi, Greg,
OK, you've missed my point too, so let's start over from scratch. Please
read carefully.
I am working under Windows, a little-known operating system which as yet has
no way of offering openssl support in ext/phar. My task is to make that
work.
If I set it up in the usual way, th
Hi Pierre,
--with-openssl is used by ext/openssl and will continue to be used
like it is now (I'm thinking of adding --with-openssl-dir for
consistency but that's all).
This has absolutely no bearing on my question. Perhaps I expressed myself
badly.
- Steph
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runti
PHP 6 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net/
Num Status Summary (64 total -- which includes 26 feature requests)
===[*General Issues]==
26771 Suspended register_tick_funtions crash under threaded webservers
===
Etienne Kneuss schreef:
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Jochem Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Etienne Kneuss schreef:
Hello,
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 2:51 AM, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
So, I really would like to revert that foward_static_call stuff and
impl
Hi,
While we nearing the release of 5.3 (hopefully?), there are many
functions in the PHP code which still use old parameter parsing API
(zend_get_parameters_ex) instead of the new one (zend_parse_parameters).
I started taking care of ext/sybase_ct.
- Timm
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Dev
31 matches
Mail list logo
