Hi Stas, Am Montag, den 23.06.2008, 09:57 -0700 schrieb Stanislav Malyshev: [...] > Why having parent:: at all then? You could always use the class name, > right? But for some reason we do have parent:: - and that reason is > that using explicit class name is not a good style in this context, it > both obscures the intent and makes unnecessary dependencies in the > code. Now imagine on top of that we have name:: and parent:: work > differently, so you don't have choice but using name:: for certain > things.
An wide-spreaded usage example for non-forwarding calls is? I would estimate, that in 70% percent, it doesn't matter, what kind of call strategy is choosen, 29% percent will be forwarding calls and only 1% are non-forwarding. cu, Lars
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
