Hi, On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We can sign and verify OpenSSL signatures without ext/openssl if we have the > library dependency. In other words, this (with the module checks in util.c > commented out) works fine: I finally took a look at why phar is not built shared as all other extension. It seems to force it only to be able to be run with no dep but still uses them if they are lately added (given that phar is now built statically, that makes little sense). But in fact, it does have deps against ext/zlib, ext/bz2 and now ext/openssl. You may want to use the library directly but as it will be easy and problemless for bz2 and zlib, it is going to be a pain for openssl. My main question now is why don't you actually reflect the (optional) dependencies? bz2 and zlib compression available will not be available if bz2 or zlib is not present, same for openssl. As testing has_xxx at runtime looks shiny and powerful, I don't think it is worth the pain. Cheers, -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
