--- Melvyn Sopacua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you're going to do this, then do it backwards compatible and
> 'leave' E_ALL at 2047 and move E_STRICT to 2048.
I like the idea of leaving E_ALL at 2047, but it's also quite intuitive
that E_ALL is the sum of all other error levels, and each of th
--- "Frank M. Kromann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm running on Windows XP and using MSSQL server 7.0 and 2000 both
> with the latest service packs.
>
> PHP 4.3.5-dev (cli) (built: Nov 4 2003 16:23:54)
> Copyright (c) 1997-2003 The PHP Group
> Zend Engine v1.3.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2003 Zend
I've seen this in SimpleXML, and although it's cool, I know from
experience, that almost every time you use it, is never going to work as
expected.
I know this is shorter. and cooler...
foreach($s->person as $person) {
$firstname_text_value = $person->firstname;
}
but this is a whole wo
The var issue is probably going to affect pear, I would presume the plan
is to make all code 'parseable' by E_STRICT, and yet most pear packages
will retail PHP4 support for quite a while.
I guess well have to start doing @class { } :)
Regards
Alan
Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 03:32 PM 12/1/200
The old code is much slower, in fact the equivalent PHP wrapper is faster then
the C function. So the bug is a performance issue, we have a bug category for
that, if you want I can open a bug report :).
Ilia
On December 1, 2003 07:07 pm, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> > iliaa
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
iliaa Mon Dec 1 18:21:26 2003 EDT
Modified files: (Branch: PHP_4_3)
/php-src/ext/standard string.c
Log:
MFH: Optimize substr_replace
Which bug does this fix ?
--
Ard
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: ht
Soonish; I need to add support for building shared extensions and
multiple SAPI; probably only a couple more evenings work to get it
into CVS.
Here's a teaser of how it "looks" (apologies for bad line breaks!)
% buildconf.bat
Rebuilding configure.js
% cscript /nologo
configure.js --enable-debug -
And also PEAR...
> -Original Message-
> From: Wez Furlong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 01 December 2003 23:45
> To: Frank M. Kromann; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Andi Gutmans
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src /win32 time.c
>
>
> I put it there in antic
Wez,
Great work. When do you expet to release that ?
- Fank
> I put it there in anticipation of adding symbols from libxml2 and
iconv.
> However, I have been working on a new build system for win32 that
should
> (hopefully) solve most problems provided that you have windows script
host
> install
I put it there in anticipation of adding symbols from libxml2 and iconv.
However, I have been working on a new build system for win32 that should
(hopefully) solve most problems provided that you have windows script host
installed.
It will also remove the dependency on Visual Studio (the IDE), so
Hi Steph,
I don't see any resons why the builddef.bat should'nt run on win98. It is
a very simple file. I do think that the @echo off statement should be
moved to the top of the file though. All output is redirected to the
phpts.def file, and this include the comments with the current
configuratio
There's also "pear bundle" now:
[EMAIL PROTECTED](~/cvs/php/php5)$ pear bundle -d ext apd
downloading apd-0.4p2.tar ...
Starting to download apd-0.4p2.tar (-1 bytes)
.done: 189,440 bytes
Package ready at '/home/ssb/cvs/php/php5/ext/apd'
You can do this with
> Because win98 supports the functions we want to use (while win95
> does not).
> And the build system has nothing to do with the runtime support :)
Agreed, but sooner or later it will.. Andi, why (specifically) did Zend
drop win98 support?
The PHP5 build system doesn't work because batch files
Because win98 supports the functions we want to use (while win95 does not).
And the build system has nothing to do with the runtime support :)
--Wez.
> Can anyone explain to me why we're not dumping support for win98 at the
same
> time pls?
>
> (Given that the PHP5 build system doesn't work on w
Can anyone explain to me why we're not dumping support for win98 at the same
time pls?
(Given that the PHP5 build system doesn't work on win98 any more.. )
> -Original Message-
> From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 01 December 2003 22:09
> To: Frank M. Kromann; Wez Furl
On Monday 01 December 2003 23:27, Derick Rethans wrote:
> > I don't quite understand the problem. E_STRICT was only meant for people
> > who really want to be pedantic. I think we can make it not part of E_ALL.
> > Is that OK?
>
> SOunds good to me, -Wall with gcc doesn't show all errors either...
Hi Michael,
I'm running on Windows XP and using MSSQL server 7.0 and 2000 both with
the latest service packs.
PHP 4.3.5-dev (cli) (built: Nov 4 2003 16:23:54)
Copyright (c) 1997-2003 The PHP Group
Zend Engine v1.3.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2003 Zend Technologies
ntwdblib is 2000.2.8.0
- Frank
> F
Frank,
Hummm... I am seeing the crash on my development machine. Using PHP
4.3.4 recompiled with the most recent php_mssql.c (1.86.2.26) this code
fails for me exactly as descibed in the bug report when run with the
CLI under Windows 2000 Professional. I'm running SQL Server 2000 SP3
with versio
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
> I would like to propose that tidy extension be bundled with PHP 5.
I'm -1 on this until the API gets cleaned up so that it either makes 1)
use of resources or 2) objects instead of polluting the global scope
with document and related settings.
Derick
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> At 02:37 PM 12/1/2003 -0500, Daniel Convissor wrote:
> >On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 01:10:25AM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> > > The strict was introduced so that we can add warnings about practices we
> > > recommend and deprecated behavior.
> > > I think "var
At 11:19 PM 12/1/2003 +0100, Michael Walter wrote:
Christian Schneider wrote:
>[...]
c) $arr[$obj] would suddenly work according the __toString().
I remember this being requested as a feature anyway ;-)
The feature request was about using objects as hash indices, not their
string representation (I
Christian Schneider wrote:
>[...]
c) $arr[$obj] would suddenly work according the __toString().
I remember this being requested as a feature anyway ;-)
The feature request was about using objects as hash indices, not their
string representation (IIRC).
Cheers,
Michael
--
PHP Internals - PHP Ru
Hello Andi,
Monday, December 1, 2003, 6:49:09 PM, you wrote:
> Hey,
> Let's try and summarize this discussion and try and see what solution we
> can come up with.
> The change which was made in convert_to_string() is quite problematic. It
> touches a very fundamental engine function and change
At 01:42 PM 12/1/2003 -0800, Frank M. Kromann wrote:
Hi,
It is my understanding that most of the Win95 users are developing on the
win platform and deploying on a server (Win or Linux). I have no idea of
how meny users we have on Win95, but I have no problem in removing support
for it in PHP5. Let
Hello Georg,
Monday, December 1, 2003, 10:11:10 PM, you wrote:
>> before bundling i'd like to see the api refined...
>>
>> right now it's not possible to work with more than one html-doc at a
>> time. (tidy_parse_file() does not return a resource to the internal
>> tidy doc, so you can only have
Hello Adam,
Monday, December 1, 2003, 6:51:38 PM, you wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
>> AMT>> $s = simplexml_load_file('file.xml');
>> AMT>> $s->person->xsearch('/my/xpath/query');
>>
>> This makes fetch for read.
> I'm with Andi and George. We should just fix SimpleXML
Hello Stanislav,
Monday, December 1, 2003, 5:55:40 PM, you wrote:
MB>>> If you don't understand XML then it is harder to understand. If you
> Well, let's suppose I do understand XML for some measure.
hehe, good :-)
MB>>> you are now basically forced to do fucking code like DOM - thanks -
MB>>>
Hi,
It is my understanding that most of the Win95 users are developing on the
win platform and deploying on a server (Win or Linux). I have no idea of
how meny users we have on Win95, but I have no problem in removing support
for it in PHP5. Lets move on :-)
- Frank
> I'm not sure if we should w
Hello Andi,
Monday, December 1, 2003, 5:57:11 PM, you wrote:
> Hey,
> I don't quite understand why SimpleXML can't return a string. Why does it
> need to return an object? It should know how to differentiate between
> read/write mode, and return a string in read mode and a proxy object in
> w
Hello Stanislav,
Monday, December 1, 2003, 5:51:20 PM, you wrote:
> AMT>> Are we discussing this feature's technical or aesthetic merits? Or
> AMT>> both?
> Technical.
> AMT>> foreach ($dom->getElementsByTagname('person') as $person) {
> AMT>> list($firstname) =
> $person->getElementsBy
I'm not sure if we should whole-heartedly abandon win95; I'd love to,
I'm just not sure. CGI/FastCGI sapi will only run under NT and later
(because of the named pipe stuff). For the people running PHP in a
web server, this shouldn't be a problem (who would be mad enough to
run '95 as a server any
> before bundling i'd like to see the api refined...
>
> right now it's not possible to work with more than one html-doc at a
> time. (tidy_parse_file() does not return a resource to the internal
> tidy doc, so you can only have one doc at a time)
Yes, Thies is right here! But
s/resource/object
At 03:32 PM 12/1/2003 -0500, Daniel Convissor wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 10:15:46PM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>
> I don't quite understand the problem. E_STRICT was only meant for people
> who really want to be pedantic. I think we can make it not part of E_ALL.
> Is that OK?
Better. The only
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 10:15:46PM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>
> I don't quite understand the problem. E_STRICT was only meant for people
> who really want to be pedantic. I think we can make it not part of E_ALL.
> Is that OK?
Better. The only drawback is people who do want to be pedantic wi
Does this mean I can enable my GetLongPathName() patch in
tsrm_virtual_cwd.c (I think it also requires Win98 but I kept it out
because there are people who are still using Windows 95). I think we
decided that we will continue supporting Windows 95 and I #If 0'd my patch.
Also, I just saw (and fi
At 02:37 PM 12/1/2003 -0500, Daniel Convissor wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 01:10:25AM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> The strict was introduced so that we can add warnings about practices we
> recommend and deprecated behavior.
> I think "var" belongs there.
> We could remove E_STRICT from E_ALL (al
IMHO, think that __toString should be explicitly
called as in java. Sure it would be great if it works
when using print, echo, etc, mean that cases when its
obvious that should evaluate to string. But ALL other
cases should be evaluated only explicitly. Maybe using
a diferent syntax for that as (st
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>
> > Derick, looking at the code it looks like we are checking for the a= case
> > and handling that correctly, but not the =a case. As in foo.com?a= vs
> > foo.com?=a
>
> That is something I did not touch, b
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 01:10:25AM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> The strict was introduced so that we can add warnings about practices we
> recommend and deprecated behavior.
> I think "var" belongs there.
> We could remove E_STRICT from E_ALL (although that'd be a bit hacky) and
> save ppl the tr
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> Derick, looking at the code it looks like we are checking for the a= case
> and handling that correctly, but not the =a case. As in foo.com?a= vs
> foo.com?=a
That is something I did not touch, but I found the problem which caused
this...forgot to chan
Derick, looking at the code it looks like we are checking for the a= case
and handling that correctly, but not the =a case. As in foo.com?a= vs
foo.com?=a
Not sure if it is yours or my bug. Currently in India and the connection
here is too damn slow to browse through cvs.
-Rasmus
On Mon, 1 De
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Antony Dovgal wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 18:21:33 +0100
> "John Huntjens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Now trying on a second machine:
> > > Linux 2.4.18
> > > gcc-3.3
> > > autoconf 2.57
> > > automake 1.7
> > > libtool 1.5
> > > Apache 2.0.48
> >
> > On this machine bu
Jani Taskinen wrote:
> Eh? What logos?
Current HEAD built as Debug_TS on Windows 2000:
http://wopr/index.php?=PHPE9568F34-D428-11d2-A769-00AA001ACF42
Fatal error: Possible integer overflow in memory allocation
(2 * -858993460 + 1) in Unknown on line 0
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http:/
This does not fix the problem.
mssql_query is designed to stop fetching for each result. Use
mssql_next_result() to move the internal pointer to the nex result and
process the data.
I have tested the code provided with the bug report and it works as I
expect (no crash).
- Frank
> I believe the
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
>Jani Taskinen wrote:
>> Was there some script to go with this..?
>
> Maybe this is related to the problem with PHP's logos I posted earlier?
Eh? What logos? (either I'm getting senile or I'm not getting some mails)
--Jani
--
PHP
Finally..if you had mentioned THIS in the first place, you wouldn't
have wasted our time..
(didn't I ask for some reproducing procedure? I don't remember anymore :)
--Jani
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Antony Dovgal wrote:
>On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 18:21:33 +0100
>"John Huntjens" <[EMA
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Antony Dovgal wrote:
>BTW, I've already asked about this message:
>
>buildconf: autoconf version 2.50 (ok)
>buildconf: Your version of autoconf likely contains buggy cache code.
> Running cvsclean for you.
> To avoid this, install autoconf-2.13 and autom
I'm not really sure on what's the best way to handle the string
conversion problem, as I haven't worked with SimpleXML yet. Andi's
examples on the other hand aren't convincing enough for me so here my
comments:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
a) include $obj; will not error out but convert the object to a
Jani Taskinen wrote:
> Was there some script to go with this..?
Maybe this is related to the problem with PHP's logos I posted earlier?
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/
Das Buch zu PHP 5: http://professionelle-softwareentwicklung-
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Antony Dovgal wrote:
>On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 18:04:46 +0200 (EET)
>Jani Taskinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Try with the snapshot from http://snaps.php.net
>
>no, php5-200312011430 didn't help (just ./configure; make).
>I've tried this snapshot and current CVS-version
In the primary use of tidy (which is to validate HTML), there is very
little need for a returned resource other than to clutter the namespace.
Unlike most extensions, where it would be useful imo the resource is
unnecessary. Since we can reuse the container for the tidy
documentation, it's much fas
Hi,
As an observer of this whole debate, I'd like to point out that if
__toString() will be magical anywhere, it must be magical everywhere PHP
would normally do an implicit cast, otherwise it does nothing but
confuse the issue. implicit cast to string always happens when using
string operato
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, George Schlossnagle wrote:
> [puts on evil twin hat]
Theo?
> To play devil's advocate to the idea - the problem with it is that it
> requires a bunch of extra code when examining an unknown document.
> This is similar to the (promised by Sterling to be fixed) quirk of
> Simpl
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 18:21:33 +0100
"John Huntjens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Now trying on a second machine:
> > Linux 2.4.18
> > gcc-3.3
> > autoconf 2.57
> > automake 1.7
> > libtool 1.5
> > Apache 2.0.48
>
> On this machine build is OK
I've changed autoconf to 2.57 and automake to 1.7 - a
On Dec 1, 2003, at 12:51 PM, Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote:
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
AMT>> $s = simplexml_load_file('file.xml');
AMT>> $s->person->xsearch('/my/xpath/query');
This makes fetch for read.
I'm with Andi and George. We should just fix SimpleXML to return
string
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> AMT>> $s = simplexml_load_file('file.xml');
> AMT>> $s->person->xsearch('/my/xpath/query');
>
> This makes fetch for read.
I'm with Andi and George. We should just fix SimpleXML to return
strings instead of objects when there are no descendant nodes
Hey,
Let's try and summarize this discussion and try and see what solution we
can come up with.
The change which was made in convert_to_string() is quite problematic. It
touches a very fundamental engine function and changes the behavior of tons
of places. For example:
a) include $obj; will not
AMT>> $s = simplexml_load_file('file.xml');
AMT>> $s->person->xsearch('/my/xpath/query');
This makes fetch for read.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/ +972-3-6139665 ext.109
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsub
before bundling i'd like to see the api refined...
right now it's not possible to work with more than one html-doc at a
time. (tidy_parse_file() does not return a resource to the internal
tidy doc, so you can only have one doc at a time)
also we should ask ourself if (i haven't used tidy so i m
On Dec 1, 2003, at 11:52 AM, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Stanislav,
Monday, December 1, 2003, 5:05:14 PM, you wrote:
DR>>> To make it simple to use? I agree with Adam here, with the new
It may make one particular case of use simple. It would make
understanding
even this case complicated, and w
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I don't quite understand why SimpleXML can't return a string. Why does it
> need to return an object? It should know how to differentiate between
> read/write mode, and return a string in read mode and a proxy object in
> write mode.
That may be a solutio
> I would like to propose that tidy extension be bundled with PHP 5.
+1
Georg
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Current HEAD built as Debug_TS on Windows 2000:
http://wopr/index.php?=PHPE9568F34-D428-11d2-A769-00AA001ACF42
Fatal error: Possible integer overflow in memory allocation
(2 * -858993460 + 1) in Unknown on line 0
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ ht
> Now trying on a second machine:
> Linux 2.4.18
> gcc-3.3
> autoconf 2.57
> automake 1.7
> libtool 1.5
> Apache 2.0.48
On this machine build is OK
JOhn
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
It can be resolved at compile-time.
My main problem is not with the casting operator but with auto-casting all
throughout the engine including parameter passing. I have a very bad
feeling that stuff will break such as array offset assigning.
Andi
At 04:58 PM 12/1/2003 +, Wez Furlong wrote:
It's probably a lot higher than you think, given that other
object models are likely to use a similar naming convention :-)
I still think it is a bad idea to hide methods like this for
overloaded objects; we have the cast handler and (to my eyes)
$foo = (string)$obj;
looks simpler and less magic
Hey,
I don't quite understand why SimpleXML can't return a string. Why does it
need to return an object? It should know how to differentiate between
read/write mode, and return a string in read mode and a proxy object in
write mode.
What am I missing?
I agree that we should allow for SimpleXML'
MB>> If you don't understand XML then it is harder to understand. If you
Well, let's suppose I do understand XML for some measure.
MB>> you are now basically forced to do fucking code like DOM - thanks -
MB>> no more simple.
Making particular case of XML handling simple is good if it doesn't mak
Hello Stanislav,
Monday, December 1, 2003, 5:05:14 PM, you wrote:
DR>>> To make it simple to use? I agree with Adam here, with the new
> It may make one particular case of use simple. It would make understanding
> even this case complicated, and will complicate a lot of other cases of
> which w
AMT>> Are we discussing this feature's technical or aesthetic merits? Or
AMT>> both?
Technical.
AMT>> foreach ($dom->getElementsByTagname('person') as $person) {
AMT>> list($firstname) = $person->getElementsByTagname('firstname');
AMT>> $firstname_text_value = $firstname->firstChi
What's the chance of having a __toString() in an external object model
(note the two underscores :)
Andi
At 02:26 PM 12/1/2003 +, Wez Furlong wrote:
I favour a), if you mean that (string)$com_object will work.
I'm not so bothered with userspace objects.
b) is just wrong for overloaded object
Hello Moriyoshi,
Monday, December 1, 2003, 2:56:29 PM, you wrote:
> On 2003/12/01, at 19:39, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>> At 12:50 AM 12/1/2003 -0500, Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote:
>>> On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>>>
>>> > At 11:59 AM 11/28/2003 -0500, Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrot
> no, php5-200312011430 didn't help (just ./configure; make).
> I've tried this snapshot and current CVS-version on 2 linux-boxes with the
same result.
> It still tries to eat memory =(
>
> Second machine is:
> Linux 2.4.18-5
> gcc-2.96
> autoconf 2.50
> automake 1.4-p5
> libtool 1.5
> Apache 1.3.2
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> DR>> To make it simple to use? I agree with Adam here, with the new
>
> It may make one particular case of use simple. It would make understanding
> even this case complicated, and will complicate a lot of other cases of
> which we didn't think now.
Jakub Vrana wrote:
Maintaining Czech documentation. If I will find mistake in English documentation, I can send a patch to someone else.
Jakub has already helped with the english documentation :
http://news.php.net/article.php?group=php.doc&article=969357093
http://news.php.net/article.php?grou
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 18:04:46 +0200 (EET)
Jani Taskinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Try with the snapshot from http://snaps.php.net
no, php5-200312011430 didn't help (just ./configure; make).
I've tried this snapshot and current CVS-version on 2 linux-boxes with the same result.
It still tr
Maintaining Czech documentation. If I will find mistake in English documentation, I
can send a patch to someone else.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
John instead of making a nuisance of yourself, why not find the problem that
affects your installation (that 3 developers cannot replicate) and suggest a
fix?
Ilia
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >
> >
> >>> What i more worried about:
> >>> Is'nt there a quality check about things commited to cvs?
> >>> It shoud not be possible to break things in such a fundamental way!!
> >>
> >> Oh shutup. It works just fine. You guys must be doing something wrong.
> >
> > No I won't!
>
>
> Hey John,
On Monday, Dec 1, 2003, at 17:12 Europe/Copenhagen, John Huntjens wrote:
What i more worried about:
Is'nt there a quality check about things commited to cvs?
It shoud not be possible to break things in such a fundamental way!!
Oh shutup. It works just fine. You guys must be doing something wrong
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 17:12:02 +0100
"John Huntjens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > > What i more worried about:
> > > Is'nt there a quality check about things commited to cvs?
> > > It shoud not be possible to break things in such a fundamental way!!
> >
> > Oh shutup. It works just fine. You
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 17:03:43 +0100 (CET)
Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, John Huntjens wrote:
>
> > > > > Current HEAD eats all memory and dies, trying to execute any script
> > ( > > > phpinfo(); ?>, for example).
> > > > > Version of HEAD from 2003-11-29 and curre
> > What i more worried about:
> > Is'nt there a quality check about things commited to cvs?
> > It shoud not be possible to break things in such a fundamental way!!
>
> Oh shutup. It works just fine. You guys must be doing something wrong.
No I won't!
I compile a snap every day, in the same co
DR>> To make it simple to use? I agree with Adam here, with the new
It may make one particular case of use simple. It would make understanding
even this case complicated, and will complicate a lot of other cases of
which we didn't think now.
DR>> overloaded objects you can finally do nice thing
Try with the snapshot from http://snaps.php.net
--Jani
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Antony Dovgal wrote:
>On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 17:40:09 +0200 (EET)
>Jani Taskinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Works fine for me.
>>
>
>I've already re-checked that about 10 times.
>
>2 minute
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, John Huntjens wrote:
> > > > Current HEAD eats all memory and dies, trying to execute any script
> ( > > phpinfo(); ?>, for example).
> > > > Version of HEAD from 2003-11-29 and current PHP_4_3 (both are built
> some
> > > minutes ago) work fine on the same machine.
> > > >
> >
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 17:40:09 +0200 (EET)
Jani Taskinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Works fine for me.
>
I've already re-checked that about 10 times.
2 minutes ago I've repeated all the process from the very beginning:
#cvs co php-src
#./buildconf
#./configure ...blah-blah (configure
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> AMT>> I *don't* think it's realisitic to make a person explictly cast
> AMT>> $item->title to a string here. That's not SimpleXML, that's
>
> If it's not a string - definitely it does.
>
> AMT>> ConfusingXML, particularly when this works perfectly fi
Jani Taskinen wrote:
> Works fine for me.
Works fine here, too. (Win32)
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/
Das Buch zu PHP 5: http://professionelle-softwareentwicklung-mit-php5.de/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailin
AMT>> I *don't* think it's realisitic to make a person explictly cast
AMT>> $item->title to a string here. That's not SimpleXML, that's
If it's not a string - definitely it does.
AMT>> ConfusingXML, particularly when this works perfectly fine:
If you find it confusing - change API of SimpleXML s
> > > Current HEAD eats all memory and dies, trying to execute any script
( > phpinfo(); ?>, for example).
> > > Version of HEAD from 2003-11-29 and current PHP_4_3 (both are built
some
> > minutes ago) work fine on the same machine.
> > >
> >
> > Thank god ;-) i thought it was on my machine only!
All I want to be able to do is this:
$s = simplexml_load_file('rss.xml');
foreach ($s->item as $item) {
print htmlentities($item->title . "\n");
}
That's not *all* I want to do, but this is my three-line test case. If
we can figure out a way to make this work, then I'm a happy camper.
I *don
Works fine for me.
--Jani
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Antony Dovgal wrote:
>Hi, all
>
>Current HEAD eats all memory and dies, trying to execute any script (phpinfo(); ?>, for example). Version of HEAD from 2003-11-29 and current
>PHP_4_3 (both are built some minutes ago) work fine on t
+1 there are ... a lot :-)
- Original Message -
From: "John Coggeshall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PHP Internals" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Tidy & PHP5
> > I would like to propose that tidy extension be bundled with PHP 5.
>
> Uhh..
> I would like to propose that tidy extension be bundled with PHP 5.
Uhh... +1 from me, too. :)
John
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
+1 if this is counted :)
Moriyoshi
On 2003/12/01, at 22:45, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
I would like to propose that tidy extension be bundled with PHP 5.
First of all it'll provide an easy means to validate and/or fix HTML
input for
webforms, which can also help existing functions such as strip_t
Its a binary maths problem:
#define E_ALL (E_ERROR | E_WARNING | E_PARSE | E_NOTICE | E_CORE_ERROR |
E_CORE_WARNING | E_COMPILE_ERROR | E_COMPILE_WARNING | E_USER_ERROR |
E_USER_WARNING | E_USER_NOTICE)
I guess either slotting E_STRICT in the and defining E_ALL_PHP5 or
(E_ALL_PHP4 and redefini
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:51:54 +0100
"John Huntjens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Current HEAD eats all memory and dies, trying to execute any script ( phpinfo(); ?>, for example).
> > Version of HEAD from 2003-11-29 and current PHP_4_3 (both are built some
> minutes ago) work fine on the same mach
> Current HEAD eats all memory and dies, trying to execute any script (, for example).
> Version of HEAD from 2003-11-29 and current PHP_4_3 (both are built some
minutes ago) work fine on the same machine.
>
Thank god ;-) i thought it was on my machine only!
Gr,
JOhn
--
PHP Internals - PHP Run
+1 from me; very useful for screen scraping as well as validation and
fixing.
--Wez.
- Original Message -
From: "Ilia Alshanetsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PHP Internals" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 1:45 PM
Subject: [PHP-DEV] Tidy & PHP5
> I would like to propos
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
