On Monday 01 December 2003 23:27, Derick Rethans wrote: > > I don't quite understand the problem. E_STRICT was only meant for people > > who really want to be pedantic. I think we can make it not part of E_ALL. > > Is that OK? > > SOunds good to me, -Wall with gcc doesn't show all errors either... I > feel it's very close to this.
If you're going to do this, then do it backwards compatible and 'leave' E_ALL at 2047 and move E_STRICT to 2048. Many apache administrators will thank you for this ;) -- Melvyn ======================================================= FreeBSD sarevok.webteckies.org 5.2-BETA FreeBSD 5.2-BETA #2: Mon Dec 1 17:58:47 CET 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ SAREVOK_NOFW_DBG i386 =======================================================
pgp00000.pgp
Description: signature
