I'm not sure if we should whole-heartedly abandon win95; I'd love to, I'm just not sure. CGI/FastCGI sapi will only run under NT and later (because of the named pipe stuff). For the people running PHP in a web server, this shouldn't be a problem (who would be mad enough to run '95 as a server anyway? ;-)
I think the question is how many people use php under 95? (for gtk?) Do we *need* to support win95 in PHP 5? My preference is to say good riddance to it, as doing so allows us to implement these missing features and catch up with the unix version. --Wez. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:23 PM Subject: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src /win32 time.c > Does this mean I can enable my GetLongPathName() patch in > tsrm_virtual_cwd.c (I think it also requires Win98 but I kept it out > because there are people who are still using Windows 95). I think we > decided that we will continue supporting Windows 95 and I #If 0'd my patch. > Also, I just saw (and fixed the indentation) of some realpath() > implementation in tsrm_win32.c. Any reason for me not to nuke it? I think > my code is better or is it being used throughout PHP? If so, we should > probably use something similar to my implementation using GetLongPathName(). > > Thoughts? > Andi > > At 10:59 PM 11/29/2003 +0000, Wez Furlong wrote: > >wez Sat Nov 29 17:59:34 2003 EDT > > > > Modified files: > > /php-src/win32 time.c > > Log: > > Fix build for new usleep implementation. > > NB: we now depend on windows 98 and later; > > windows 95 does not have these timing functions. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
