servation does not hold for the heavy tail of the
Internet. Actually, I am currently investigating other datasources,
that are not biased towards end-users and "BigN" content providers;
There, v6 adoption for the heavy tail actually ranges more in the
field of 1%...
With best Regard
for IPv4 routes, replacing this use with IPv6 addresses. This
> document describes how to provision DHCP-configured hosts with
> their
> routes in such a situation.
--
Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig
T +31 616 80 98 99
M tob...@fiebig.nl
___
Int-area mailing list -- int-area@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to int-area-le...@ietf.org
Moin,
I just had a stupid idea in the context of v4-w-v6-nh: Why don't we
just do NDP? The obvious answer is: Because NDP does not support IPv4.
The more complex one is: Well, actually... why not?
RFC4291 gives us 'IPv4-ComIPv4-Compatible IPv6 Addresspatible IPv6
Address[es]' in Sec. 2.5.5.1 to
guess there is an argument to be had whether IPv4-
compatible/IPv4 mapped addresses can be considered 'assigned' to an
interface if the 'real' IPv4 is on there.
With best regards,
Tobias
--
Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig
T +31 616 80 98 99
M tob...@fiebig.nl
Pronouns: he/him/his
__
With best regards,
Tobias
--
Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig
T +31 616 80 98 99
M tob...@fiebig.nl
Pronouns: he/him/his
___
Int-area mailing list -- int-area@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to int-area-le...@ietf.org
cost, at
> least relative to the overall cost of running an infrastructure asset
> like an IXP.
Yeah, I generally agree that it currently is just that.
However, getting into enabling it becoming more... why not? Also...
better than renumbering? ;-)
With best regards,
Tobias
--
Dr.-Ing.
to me, i am already on board!
.oO( You should know by now that I have a very specific liking for
networking dragons, especially the swamp-y kind ;-P )
With best regards,
Tobias
--
Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig
T +31 616 80 98 99
M tob...@fiebig.nl
Pronouns: he/him/his
all members. ;-)
With best regards,
Tobias
--
Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig
T +31 616 80 98 99
M tob...@fiebig.nl
Pronouns: he/him/his
___
Int-area mailing list -- int-area@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to int-area-le...@ietf.org
summaries of comments (apologies in advance if I
> misunderstood your point, or over summarized!):
>
> David Lamparter: Concern — this should also work on hosts; the host
> is just the first router. Please include a note that they are also
> covered.
>
> Tobias Fiebig: 8950
er also sends you v4 routes with a
_v4_ nexthop.
With best regards,
Tobias
--
Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig
T +31 616 80 98 99
M tob...@fiebig.nl
Pronouns: he/him/his
___
Int-area mailing list -- int-area@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to int-area-le...@ietf.org
Moin,> My personal opinion is that this is a fairly specific use case, and
> that the suggested requirement is a little too specific for what aims
> to be a short and simple document. I'm afraid it would just create
> confusion, rather than enlighten the reader.
As much as I am an RFC8950-on-IXe
WG, please indicate it by replying to this email.
> The call will end on Monday the 26th of May (AoE).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Juan-Carlos & Wassim
> (IntArea WG chairs)
>
> ___
> Int-area mailing list -- int-area@ietf.org
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
