Moin, > At the risk of raining on some parades, rfc8950 at internet exchanges > is experimental so far. The long term future of this approach isn't > clear, given that its intention is to relieve the impact of lack of > availability of ipv4, which is readily available at modest cost, at > least relative to the overall cost of running an infrastructure asset > like an IXP.
Yeah, I generally agree that it currently is just that. However, getting into enabling it becoming more... why not? Also... better than renumbering? ;-) With best regards, Tobias -- Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig T +31 616 80 98 99 M tob...@fiebig.nl Pronouns: he/him/his _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list -- int-area@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to int-area-le...@ietf.org
