Moin, Yes, please adopt (and then quickly ship) this; This is long overdue.
With best regards, Tobias On Wed, 2025-04-09 at 17:00 +0200, Warren Kumari wrote: > Dear IntArea Chairs, > > The authors of draft-chroboczek-intarea-v4-via-v6 - "IPv4 routes with > an IPv6 next hop" would like to request adoption of this document by > the IntArea WG. > > It's been a few weeks since the meeting, so here are some helpful > resources (I'd managed to swap out all state, so I assume you have > too :-)): > Draft: draft-chroboczek-intarea-v4-via-v6 - "IPv4 routes with an IPv6 > next hop" > Slides: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/122/materials/slides-122- > intarea-ipv4-routes-with-an-ipv6-next-hop-00.pdf > Video recording (linked to > discussion): https://youtu.be/NkbWXK1I-74?t=2926 > > Very hight level summaries of comments (apologies in advance if I > misunderstood your point, or over summarized!): > > David Lamparter: Concern — this should also work on hosts; the host > is just the first router. Please include a note that they are also > covered. > > Tobias Fiebig: 8950 — Please please go ahead with this. It works on > hosts. I’ve setup an AS with only V6 other than on the hosts. > > David Schinazi: This is great, I support it and am happy to review. > > Maria Matejka: There are some people requesting translations Would > like more guidance on not routing differently between v4 and v6. [ > Note: The audio was not great, and I may have missed a bunch of > detail. Apologies.] > > Name inaudible: It is unclear if SAVNET will allow the borrowed > address to be used. Please make sure that SAVNET WG is aware. > > Krishnaswamy Ananthamurthy: Cisco Nrxus OS has implemented this for > more than 8 years. Are you also planning on covering recursive next > hops? Your example does, but please add details in the draft. > > Éric Vyncke: This is V4 via V6, but please note that it also works > for V6 via V4. > With AD hat:I don't think that Standards Track is the right track for > this document. > W: Yeah, this should probably be Informational, or *possibly* BCP. > Chairs: If you agree that this should be adopted, please let us know > which :-) > > Thanks for you time, > Warren Kumari > > > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list -- int-area@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to int-area-le...@ietf.org -- Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig T +31 616 80 98 99 M tob...@fiebig.nl Pronouns: he/him/his _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list -- int-area@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to int-area-le...@ietf.org
