This is CA-1, but I thought RMM was compatible. And, I there are SAF profiles
controlling access. CA-1 defines it's own class for them
EXPDT=98000
Nonresident EXPDT keyword. Specifies that the tape volume being processed is
not under CA 1(r)
Tape Management System control
> -Original Messa
Careful, *@$$! Probably does something in APL :)
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Pew, Curtis G
> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2019 1:01 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Unreadable code (Was: Concurre
The Software AG solutions are EntireX (I think now called webmethods) and Connx
(and SQL gateway to Adabas). You could probably write Natural to talk Unix
System Services sockets. Or CICS EXCI
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Brian Westerman
> Se
It will all fit on a Mod 27. As below, Start with Mark Zelden's example. Tailor
for your needs.
I did find that a separate SYSCAT volume made the subsequent steps of recovery
easier.. I IPL the single system to refresh the other copy of the single system
and a resuce SYSCAT, then IPL each Lpar (
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Edward Finnell
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 4:05 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: HCD question
>
> Don't forget to update LOAD and PARMLIB values.
True. I'm at
Required is rare. Our last was for OSA related MCL. Before that, it was a
scheduled power outage to upgrade the UPS.
Otherwise, what Ed says. Each instance can be different. For us, it was also
the only way to set the hardware clock.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discus
It would take some effort :) but, the direct call interface is still there :)
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Brian Westerman
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 4:22 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re:
I changed my SMS AC routines many years ago to intercept most tape allocations,
route them to disk and never looked back. Even when we went to virtual tape, it
still simplified things.
No application jobs directly use tape.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
I am refining our DR procedures. After I restore the DFHSM CDSs from the most
recent back-up, I need to update so as to not overwrite that back-up with the
next occurrence of CDS backup. The fine manual says to use FIXCDS S MHCR
PATCH(X'B1' nnn) to set the next back-up number.
FIXCDS requir
..
>
> If you don't want to run a special ARCCMDxx and you don't want to issue the
> FIXCDS command manually, what other approach did you have in mind?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> > Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
&
of ARCCMD* This will be executed
> before a CDS backup can occur.
>
> You can also bring dfHSM up in emergency mode obtain the backup number
> and issue the FIXCDS command followed by SETSYS NOEMERGENCY.
>
> HTH,
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainfram
t; From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> > > Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
> > > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2019 3:19 PM
> > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > > Subject: DFHSM FIXCDS before start-up?
> > >
> > > I am refining our DR procedures
Or what language it's written in? awe had a homegrown PL/I program called
DSCOPY. Might have source. No longer have PL/I compiler.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Tom Marchant
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2019 9:47 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.E
My DEFAULT DATACLAS specifies a SPACE allocation, fairly large with RLSE. This,
plus space constraint relief, and also EXT as the DEFAULT has eliminated almost
all x37 abends here.
I also still run FDR COMPAK, fairly aggressive DFHSM migration to ML2 VTL, and
a good sized overflow pool.
>
List [mailto:IBM-
> m...@listserv.ua.edu]
> > On Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
> > Sent: 05 March, 2019 23:19
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Subject: Re: Disk space allocation question [EXTERNAL]
> >
> > My DEFAULT DATACLAS specifies a SPACE allocation, fairly large
See Zowe
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Don Leahy
> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 12:09 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Disturbing news in the z/OS 2.4 announcement letter
>
> "Withdrawal of ISPF Workstation Agent (WSA)
>
> z/OS
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=ibm1MIGR-5081748
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@li
hat more do you want? It TELLS you that any z/OS marketing and
> service announce, availability, and withdrawal dates are applicable
> worldwide. You didn't want actual dates, did you?
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 6:23 PM Gibney, Dave wrote:
>
> > https://urldefense.proo
Unknowable and various ((Cobol, HLASM, pl/1, RPG 😊 )😊
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Paul Edwards
> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2019 1:03 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: AMODE 32
>
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 15:55:42 -0400, Joe Monk
> wr
Is this the PGM=CUA625? Or is it a dynamically called sub program? If so, do
you know that this isn't the first time that the data mix caused it to be
called?
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Jesse 1 Robinson
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2019 4:52
The Catalog/VVDS data for VSAM can be wrong or out of date. These fields are
only updated on successful close. So, you can't count on it for files actively
updated by long running tasks, or tasks that end without properly closing the
VSAM files.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainfra
The time of creation is not stored by z/OS for non-Unix System Services files.
Your options are the logging provided by SMF, or change the application to
store into the Unix System Services file system.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Peter Vel
I need to update my ACS/SMS configuration. Thanks, Ed, for the "new"
information. I didn't know this.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Ed Jaffe
> Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2020 7:29 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: TIME a data set wa
I've never gone here. The impression I got from the folks on this list was that
GRS ring performance was abysmal for more than 2 lpars.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Brian Westerman
> Sent: Monday, June 01, 2020 9:37 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.
I am reminded that my default REGION is still appropriate for the 80's (if not
the 70's). I've never gotten around to changing it, because REGION= in JCL is
so easy.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Charles Mills
> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2020 11
Semi long background. Our MFaaS provider did not migrate us to a host capable
of running z/OS 2.3 until after z/OS 2.3 was no longer orderable. For
USERKEYCSA reasons (Natural Global Buffer Pool, Natural out of support)), I
don't really want to go to z/OS 2.4.
Our MFaaS provider was able to ge
-Pa0JDX4kSbkg$
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Wednesday, June 3, 2020 6:36 PM, Gibney, Dave
> wrote:
>
> > Semi long background. Our MFaaS provider did not migrate us to a host
> capable of running z/OS 2.3 until after z/OS 2.3 was no longer orderable. For
> USER
ank | 1830 East Paris Ave, SE | MD RSCB2H | Grand Rapids,
> MI
> 49546
> 616.653.8429 | fax: 616.653.2717
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
> Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 6:36 PM
> To: IB
___
> Dave Jousma
> AVP | Manager, Systems Engineering
>
> Fifth Third Bank | 1830 East Paris Ave, SE | MD RSCB2H | Grand Rapids,
> MI
> 49546
> 616.653.8429 | fax: 616.653.2717
>
>
> -Original Message-
> Fro
Also, it's often better to nest than to make compound conditions.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Charles Mills
> Sent: Friday, June 05, 2020 12:54 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: COBOL Question
>
> I long ago decided never to b
om: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Friday, June 05, 2020 1:12 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: COBOL Question
>
> On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 19:56:06 +, Gibney, Dave wrote:
>
> >Also, it's often better to nest than to
rame Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Friday, June 05, 2020 1:33 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: COBOL Question
>
> On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 20:17:06 +, Gibney, Dave wrote:
>
> >Using OP
> > IF TVOLL (IND1) N
Only if localsthost is defined as such in the RESOLVER configuration or your
DNS systems
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Sean Gleann
> Sent: Monday, June 08, 2020 6:15 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: AZD messages?
>
> As far as
And the output from smpout and smprpt
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 10:57 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: SMPe Apply not working
>
> Show the APPLY statement.
>
> On Thu, 11 Jun
If you stay current on HOLDDATA, which you should, then conditions will have
changed between the two sequences. You are not actually recreating your tested
maintenance environment into your production.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Bill Gianne
This list doesn't do attachments.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Bill Giannelli
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 11:36 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: SMPe Apply not working
>
> I attached the apply check and the nonapply list
>
I am seeing this in the CAUSER report for an APPLY CHECK:
CAUSER FMID MESSAGE ID PAGE ERROR DESCRIPTION AND POSSIBLE CAUSES
UJ01705 HOT77B0 GIM23911E 16 LINK-EDIT PROCESSING FAILED FOR MODULE
FSUMXTSM IN LMOD FSUMSTSM IN THE SFSUMLIB
LIBRARY.
and Rapids,
> MI
> 49546
> 616.653.8429 | fax: 616.653.2717
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 2:57 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: And another APPLY difficulty -
> > ___
> > Dave Jousma
> > AVP | Manager, Systems Engineering
> >
> > Fifth Third Bank | 1830 East Paris Ave, SE | MD RSCB2H | Grand Rapids,
> > MI
> > 49546
> > 616.653.8429 | fax: 616.653.2717
> >
> >
>
> Fifth Third Bank | 1830 East Paris Ave, SE | MD RSCB2H | Grand Rapids,
> MI
> 49546
> 616.653.8429 | fax: 616.653.2717
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 3:40 PM
>
Aside from, I think this is still true, absent Dovetail extensions, the
requirement that SFTP only works with ZFS/HFS files
>
> There are other things, I'm sure I'm forgetting. Switch to SFTP, and life
> gets
> much easier--most of the time.
>
> First Horizon Bank
> Mainframe Technical Support
We live behind an f5 Load Balancer. It knows our certificates and can
decrypt/recrypt to determine the PORT. We flat don't do active FTPS
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Charles Mills
> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2020 11:01 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV
age-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2020 1:36 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: How is Passive FTP with TLS and NAT supposed to work?
>
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 18:21:47 +, Gibney, Dave wrote:
>
In Outlook, it's File -> Options -> Mal, scroll down a bit to Replies and
Forwarding
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Jackson, Rob
> Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2020 11:58 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Quote style
>
> Tom, always
I use Filezilla (Open Source) and Bluezone (now from Rocket) Both have their
pluses and minuses.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick
> Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 11:10 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Good FTP client f
' CLI?
>
> First Horizon Bank
> Mainframe Technical Support
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
> Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 2:23 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Good FTP client for MVS
>
> I don't know if this is your problem or not, but in FileZilla's Site
> Manager, I have two hosts defined for a few z/OS systems, one for MVS, and
> one for USS. The "server type" matters... "MVS..." vs. "Unix".
>
> sas
>
>
&g
I don't feel like looking it up myself, right now. What is the explanation?
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Mark Jacobs
> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:12 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Dataset Quandry
>
> Yes on looking up the
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get
> &search=markjacobs@protonmail.com__;!!JmPEgBY0HMszNaDT!43jEHqisSf
> w42wj-St8fj3Sca6qT5N0_EqH_JxBgXN4k0JbtF4GGvgWjFhWveg$
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Tuesday, June 23, 2020 4:16 PM, Gibney,
What's 100-10?
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Mark Jacobs
> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:33 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Dataset Quandry
>
> Nope. The entry before and after are both fine.
>
> NONVSAM --- TCXMV010.TDV4
96Un2yAuS2kUQ0UpQ
> > > Ahi4YxPb-
> 2Dw0a50S8KcXeaJNnefa6tWYdhkI0FAqHB01vatXtNdFJbrTecnutqjMioyyg
> > >
> 5n8Vt469KqfZe4taoQLgUo2A7KxcmnK1Cs5MaTQymAx8UHtgHg00UUG5YmE
> gzcPfy-5Foy
> > > mrpqqjvI0FO7E7mi-
> 5FUCUALbUhTief0prFLLZIxJXRHYfdlvxJAS3FgRDOW97388y0Oge
>
The details in the documentation is a bit scattered. Including separate
sections for FTPS and tn3270
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Lionel B Dyck
> Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2020 3:26 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: AT-TLS ?
>
> Anyo
Did you reassemble (assuming Wylbur code is available) with new JES2 macros?
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Longnecker, Dennis
> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 4:16 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: SuperWylbur Users
>
> Hello -
> Anyone
At $199, I signed up using personal money. At that price, and even if I can
only join a subset, it's a no-brainer opportunity.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.
My management decided against it, but a couple years ago, a new low tier z13
and more than enough DASD for us would have been around $400K or so.
Unfortunately, the z/OS licensing was sill more than twice this.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of G
Did this in the nineties
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of kekronbekron
> Sent: Sunday, July 05, 2020 5:13 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Storage & tape question
>
> Hello List,
>
> Just wondering ... assuming there's a primary stora
Actually, it is. But, BLA-2 below is still offset 3 bytes from BLA-RECORD
because BLA-1 is only 3 bytes long
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Joe Monk
> Sent: Sunday, July 05, 2020 4:38 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Assembler q
I believed hat all our passwords were at least DES. Recenly upgraded sandbox
z/OS 2.1 to z/OS 2.3. Now getting:
IRR013I VERIFICATION FAILED. INVALID PASSWORD GIVEN.
For an job submitted via an STC with userid and password on the JOB card. Works
fine in z/OS 2.1
Is there some way I can confirm
Same here. My one and only priority 1 issue with IBM. When the z9BC was brand
new, I defined all 4 crypto cards as accelerators. Couldn't define my master
keys or get SSL working. (It had been working on the z800-0B1)
We elected to go forward with the processor upgrade that Saturday. And I calle
ver
> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2020 12:49 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: ICSF -- initializing a PKDS
>
> A SEV1 does get a lot of attention
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> I promise you I can’t type or
> Spell on any smartphone
>
> > On Jul 16,
Mine goes to syslogd. When syslogd wasn't configured, it landed in he console
log
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Charles Mills
> Sent: Friday, July 17, 2020 8:21 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Where does FTP server F DEBUG= wri
It's been a very long time since I drove in Canada (BC). What I noticed was
that the yellow, recommended speed thought the upcoming curve, really meant go
that speed through the curve. Unlike ours in the US where they are very much
advisory.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe D
Actually, the pound is a unit of force in English units. I believe weight is
measured in stones.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Seymour J Metz
> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 4:23 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: OOBOL and Engl
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on
> behalf of Gibney, Dave
> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2020 8:26 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: OOBOL and English was Re: Still COBOL After All These Years?
>
> Actually, the pound is a unit of force in Engli
(Seymour J.) Metz
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://mason.gmu.edu/*smetz3__;fg!!JmPEg
> BY0HMszNaDT!7i7tDktIvhYFOl7W3Lc4g1gb3zY9Z96bxOUHwZei8_8SEWGN6V
> Bnx0KJcGj9fQ$
>
>
> ____
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on
> be
Possibly some info in syslogd
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Seymour J Metz
> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 8:31 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Started task stopping immediately. No error messages.
>
> It looks like you're using
Also, there are chapters titled something like Reason Code amd Return codes
These code are often actually two halfwords search the book for the lower half
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Gord Tomlin
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 1:47 PM
> To: I
And the msg error is?
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Mark Jacobs
> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2020 6:22 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: RMM Scratch Processing
>
> Yea. I've looked at that manual, found the job. Ran it, failed wit
il.
>
> GPG Public Key -
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get
> &search=markjacobs@protonmail.com__;!!JmPEgBY0HMszNaDT!7J--
> CkqfH3NkPR86ASrtKKL1JysLyYwHWCGqpNEeFXC54UZUwARZKPHAKjv6Xw$
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Tuesd
Same infrastructure as Virtual SHARE? :) g,d&r
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Ed Jaffe
> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2020 1:33 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Knowledge Center ...
>
> ... has been down all day long for us.
>
> Anyo
I have this vague memory of being able to have data embedded inside a Rexx
Exec. Some manner of data start and end delimiting lines and accessed via
looping with PULL or PARSE.
I know I can just PUSH or QUEUE data onto the stack, but that's not what I
vaguely remember. Am I all wet, or just
Jm-SdL4kdSh4x5MLNKPALpw8c-
> yeSsg4Vf-GBrak71rQ$
>
>
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on
> behalf of Gibney, Dave
> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2020 3:56 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Rexx detail, or things I d
aw$
>
>
>
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on
> behalf of Gibney, Dave
> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2020 4:04 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Rexx detail, or things I dont do often enough
>
> I think this
My new shutdown automation, IS AXR. I did a loop to C AXR10 to 01, but I have
to identify and skip the one I'm running in. 😊
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Ed Jaffe
> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2020 9:17 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subje
Run the report files through their sort product. Depending on how complicated
the split criteria is, it might be quite simple to split.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Tony Thigpen
> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 6:21 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.
I think I've recently seen SDSFand Rexx examples here sufficient to make a
start at this.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Tony Thigpen
> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 3:03 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: report splitting
>
> I
How about with APIs available with E(JES) :) ?
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Ed Jaffe
> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2020 4:30 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: report splitting
>
> On 8/28/2020 3:40 PM, G
If the certificate they present is signed by a recognized CA, you should be
able to get root and any required intermediates from the signing CA's site.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Brian Westerman
> Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2020 11:55 PM
> To:
First of all, I know that CICS 3.1 is is very far and away out of service. My
CICS Sysprog retired over a decade ago, I only fake knowledge of CIS when it
becomes a necessity.
SystemSSL in z/OS 2.3 has changed the defaults and available ciphers. This is a
good thing security wise. But, I can't
Over on CICS-L, I was told that TLS 2.3 requires z/OS 2.4. Is this true? Any
prospect of a implemnting PTF?
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive a
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Ed Jaffe
> Sent: Friday, September 04, 2020 8:37 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: TLS 1.3 in z/OS 2.3?
>
> On 9/3/2020 11:45 PM, Timothy Sipples wrote:
> > Dave Gibney wrote:
> >> Over on CICS-L, I
You can IPL Standalone DSS or FDR from CD
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Jesse 1 Robinson
> Sent: Friday, September 04, 2020 11:51 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Ransoming a mainframe disk farm
>
> It’s Friday, so don’t rag on me f
obinson
> Southern California Edison Company
> Electric Dragon Team Paddler
> SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
> 323-715-0595 Mobile
> 626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
> robin...@sce.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
I suppose dynamic would work. Today, many more of the parmlib members
referenced by IEASYSxx can also be activated on the fly with seT. What I'd like
would be a nice table or list showing which ones can be seT. A similar list for
JES would be nice, but probably shorter to list those that can't b
I don't think anyone has mentioned IEACMDxx as another source of Starts, etc.
IBM discourages user modification, probably part of why COMMDSxx exists.
And, not this isn't where the RACF address space is started.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of To
My experience is that the RSU doesn't et to RECEIVEORDER until one day after I
get the email that the new service level is available
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Styles, Andy (ITS zPlatform Services)
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2019 9:04 AM
> To:
I believe there is more than one on the CBT tape. The one I use is TAPEMAP#
from /Leonard Woren. I've never needed any control staements
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Jake Anderson
> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2019 10:33 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.
Is there a way to determine if and how much a VTOCIX is fragmented. Way back
when (when disk wasn't quite so cheap), we standardized on parking the VTOCIX
in the 14 tracks left in the 1st cylinder, and for a Mod-3, VTOC of 105 tracks
(7CYL) immediately following, and usually a 2 CYL VVDS right a
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 4:43 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Determine level of fragmentation in VTOCIX?
>
> [[ SEI WARNING *** This email was sent f
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Pew, Curtis G
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 3:06 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Determine level of fragmentation in VTOCIX?
>
> On Jul 11, 2019, at 3:43 PM, G
s.v2r3.ickug00_ick40744.htm-23ick40-2Dgen745-5F-
> 5Fmvtoc&d=DwIFaQ&c=C3yme8gMkxg_ihJNXS06ZyWk4EJm8LdrrvxQb-
> Je7sw&r=u9g8rUevBoyCPAdo5sWE9w&m=PVubGLGfvoz3GXBke48wI2veoJ3
> ilGiF4T_wx_JLE3o&s=UBqnH6rbqMudvVVOjW3y1eA3ruFjAEBN9Yp6Do5Qe-
> 0&e=
>
> On Thu, Jul
000 to 4000 datasets
are archived reports. But, there are some archived report datasets on the other
volumes.
I am thinking I'll QUINEW the 3 outlier volumes and see what happens.
> -Original Message-
> From: Willie Bunter
> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2019 6:44 AM
> To: Gibne
The only "moderately safe" way to share PDSE outside a sysplex is read-only,
from all LPARs after PDSE creation/population.
You can sometimes get away with it if you only update from 1 and only 1 LPAR.
But, the latency of the update being noticed by the others can cause issues.
Update from 2 or m
x5ErYtDwQF-
> 4Yd0E2So1uiOo1RJJDM&s=Z_ByYRZvSvYlMRpj12KIhN_rJF0jOwSLEvfqPx4PSh
> s&e=
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Wednesday, July 24, 2019 2:51 PM, Gibney, Dave
> wrote:
>
> > The only "moderately safe" way to share PDSE outside a sysplex is read-
&
The danger in sharing a PDSE "read-only" is when it get's updated "somehow" by
"someone" by "mistake"
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of S B
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2019 12:26 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Sharing PDSEs in sha
I could be wrong, but my memory from about a years ago is not at the then most
current level, and no intent to add the feature.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Farley, Peter x23353
> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 7:26 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA
We've always had Syncsort. I don't remember DFSORT being an optional feature
for my z/OS 2.1 Serverpac. Does DFSORT live entirely in SYS1.LPA and
SYS1.LINKLIB(SYS1.SIEALNKE)?
We are further on the path of downsizing the z/OS based services. In about a
year, they plan is continue to run for stat
nframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2019 2:41 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: DFSORT?
>
> We've always had Syncsort. I don't remember DFSORT being an optional
> feature for my z/OS 2.1 Serverpac. Does DFSORT
sultant, Mainframe Engineer
> Mainframe and Scheduling | Infrastructure Technology Services Toyota
> Motor North America bill.bis...@toyota.com
> Office: (469) 292-5149
> Cell: (502) 316-4386
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IB
I am considering what upgrade path (if any) I might take from my current z/OS
2.1 RSU 1903 system. I thought that I wouldn't go to 2.3 because I was using
SMTP and not CSSMTP. The configuring and implementation of CSSMTP has proven
remarkably uneventful. I am not aware of any other gotchas bet
1 - 100 of 985 matches
Mail list logo
