Did this in the nineties > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On > Behalf Of kekronbekron > Sent: Sunday, July 05, 2020 5:13 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Storage & tape question > > Hello List, > > Just wondering ... assuming there's a primary storage product out there that > can store how-many-ever hoo-haa-bytes, and is a good product in general, it > should make sense to begin eliminating all tape (3490/3590) use right? > First, ML1 & ML2 in HSM, then HSM itself, then rebuild jobs to write to disk, > or do SMS/ACS updates to make it all disk reads/writes. > > Looking at the current storage solutions out there, this is possible, right? > What would be the drawbacks (assume that primary storage is super cost- > efficient, so there's no need to archive anything). > > - KB > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
