S STCNAME...MSGCLASS=(held sysout class).
I.e. ODISP=(keep,keep)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Wayne Bickerdike
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 2:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Where do started PROC errors go?
[CAUTION: This Email is
Check you ACS routines. Most Installations have a "escape clause" that allows
the ACS rotuines to be overridden.
Otherwise, use dfDSS. COPY DSN(.) NSC NMC BYPASSACS(**)
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Gadi Ben-Avi
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2020
Comments interspersed
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Lionel B Dyck
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2020 12:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: DFSMShsm questions
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the
sender, Do
Yup!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2020 5:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IODF/IOCDS questions
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the
sender, Don’t click li
There is an old usermod that stored the date time somewhere in the F1 DSCB.
Check the CBTTAPE.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom
Brennan
Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2020 1:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: TIME a data set was created?
[CA
See the manuals "Setting up a SYSPLEX" and "Merging Systems Into A SYSPLEX".
Both can be found on the IBM zOS Library site.
Some key items not available in a base sysplex:
GRS START (use CTC for inter-image communication.
VTAM Generic resources, VTAM MNPS
RACF data sharing (RACF sysplex communica
I can speak from experience. GRS Ring performance sucks with even 2 LPARs
compared to GRS STAR.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Gibney, Dave
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2020 11:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Base SYSPLEX setup
[CAUTION: Th
A total of 4 ficon ports are required with 2 cables. The FICON CTC's can be
shared by all connected LPARs via PATHIIN/PATHOUT in SYS1.PARMLIB(COUPLExx).
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Timothy Sipples
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 12:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN
Speaking from experience, I did not notice any significant CPU associated w/GRS
Ring. I did notice approximately 3x elongation in elapsed time in some GRS
intensive tasks.
(e.g. dfHSM dataset expiration)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
4 ficon ports(CHPIDs) and 2 ficon cables are required. Each cable is shared in
a bi-directional manner.
e.g CTCchipd1 <> chpid2 CNC Signalling Path 1
CNCchpid3 <> chpid4 CTC Signalling Path 2
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
B
You cannot share chpid without the switch. It is point to point
topology, not daisy chains like in Bus&Tag.
That is incorrect. I routine share channels across LPARs.
The purpose of the switch is to connect multiple physical CECs to a single
device.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Main
75994fb13ddd08d807cf5e79%7C189de737c93a4f5a8b686f4ca9941912%7C0%7C0%7C637267934525141512&sdata=A0ZMSCQP891zEGNkIz%2F0ZCWtRoh8%2F%2Bji9XcsVgS75G4%3D&reserved=0
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Allan Staller [allan.stal...@hcl.com]
Sent:
I used to be possible do download JAVA directly from IBM w/o going through
Shopz. Check the JAVA pages at IBM.COM
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Gibney, Dave
Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 5:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: No Java, in the
Computer.]
So the 4 paths can be shared via the three LPARs?
Brian
On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 13:01:50 +, Allan Staller wrote:
>4 ficon ports(CHPIDs) and 2 ficon cables are required. Each cable is shared
>in a bi-directional manner.
>
>e.g CTCchipd1 <> chpid2 CNC
Is NV 5.4 even supported at this time? I am running NV 6.2 on z/OS 2.2. and 2.4
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 2:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Netview 5.4
[CAUTION: This Email is from outs
I don't know if SMPWKDIR can be changed at this point in the process. I do know
that the application is mart enough to restart at the point of failure, as
opposed to "at the top".
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Wednesday, June 1
Nope!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 10:04 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Messages & Codes (was Re: "Everyone wants to retire mainframes")
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organizatio
Not sure I remember the details. I worked with one ex-sysprog that cloned the
SMP/E target environment to the sysres for documentation purposes (1980's.)
ZoneCopy should do a lot of what you seem to be looking for.
I (personally do not think that is the way to go. My suggestion is
One global zone
You still end up with a major syncing problem using either Shmuel's or my
previous suggestion.
I personally have 1 set of target zones and a "canned" job to build an new
sysres from scratch using the SMP/E targets as the source.
I am happy to share the JCL if you would like.
HTH,
-Origina
Wrong Global zone specified?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 12:18 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SMPe Apply not working
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust th
There should be some downloadable doc along with the order. I presume this is a
cbpdo order, and not a Serverpac order.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2020 6:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: DDDEFs and
Is anyone aware of the syntax to force execution on a particular LPAR in a
remote JES2 MAS.
The NJE links are established and running.
I tried /*ROUTE XEQ node.lpar but this executed on an incorrect JES2 instance.
Thanks in advance,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion Lis
eering
Fifth Third Bank | 1830 East Paris Ave, SE | MD RSCB2H | Grand Rapids, MI 49546
616.653.8429 | fax: 616.653.2717
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 11:29 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: JES2 remo
links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email,
which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.]
As there are now native zOS TSO/REXX routines to do the same, why bother with
the CBT program?
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 17:14:33 + Allan Staller
wrote:
:>I am looking for
erved=0
"Worry more about your character than your reputation. Character is what you
are, reputation merely what others think you are." - John Wooden
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 12:15 PM
To: IB
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 1:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CBTTAPE
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the
sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a
Works for me with no issues. However I use sdsf.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 1:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization.
Default is MSGLEVEL=(1,1)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 2:47 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unle
Adrdssu defrag will produce some of the same information.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Brian France
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2020 8:45 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: dfdss equivalent to fdr map
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the
Apar number?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 9:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the
sender, Don
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 9:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
Not assigned yet. I'll let you know when I get it.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Friday, Ju
ISTR a few programs on the CBTTAPE for things like this. File73 and file 384
might be possibilities. Several others
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Edgington, Jerry
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 7:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMP/e m
1) back up datasetr
2) diagnose/examine the ucat
3) idcams Del 'entryname' nscr
4) idcams Del entryname nvr file(dd1)
5) restore from recent backup (if desired).
Have you looked up " IDC3009I ** VSAM CATALOG RETURN CODE IS 90 - REASON CODE
IS IGG0CLFO-54"?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Ma
Each ptf of JAVA is a full replacement. You only need the "last" PTF.
Next time you order maintenance or code, specify "eliminate supersedes" when
placing you order.
BTW, this means any modifications to the java source provided will need to be
reinstalled each time JAVA is updated.
BTDTGTS
HTH
AT-TLS is required for TN3270 (and others
The above is incorrect. AT-TLS is *NEVER* a requirement.
It is up to the installation to determine whether or not AT-TLS will be used.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jackson, Rob
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 202
Hopefully this will provide the clarity needed.
AT-TLS works at the physical layer.
FTPS and SFTP work at the logical layer
Although not mutually exclusive, If you are doing one, the other is unnecessary.
Start the flame wars! Shields up. Condition Red! AT-TLS vs. SFTP!
-Original Message---
d my own
program would then be responsible for certificates. AT-TLS would not be
needed, well, unless an auditor doesn't trust my SSL code. That actually could
be a consideration even for things like SFTP I guess - there's your first flame
:)
On 6/30/2020 1:42 PM, Allan Staller wrote:
ITYM TB, not MB
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jackson, Rob
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 9:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Storage & tape question
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the
sender, Don’
Until fairly recently,, there was no native ssh client on Windoze.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 9:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Using SSH and SFTP from Windows to z/OS using authorized_keys
There are still some minor issues involved w/vvds, etc. placement, but there
are very moinr, and for most volumes will make zero difference.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 10:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Many times a new box is populated with back-end drives from the same "batch"
of hardware, with the same MTBF.
The result is that many drives will tend to fail about the same time.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 3:37
You need to deactivate/reactivate the LPAR (@ HMC) after configuring the image
profile as desired. This is more than an IPL..
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 5:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject:
Increase the region on the job(s) doing the retrieval. CSI returns the data in
a buffer in *YOUR* private storage, not his.
Depending on the amount of data returned by the request you might/might not
receive a correct answer.
The results can range from success to "not found" (your case) or S878
Fast/easy: Encrypt/decrypt a copy of the original dataset for backup purposes.
Slow/hard: Code up ICSF calls to encrypt the info.
Expensive: Upgrade VTS to support encryption.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mark Jacobs
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2020 8:0
You used an syntactically correct, but functionally incorrect version of the
listcat command.
The version you need is LIST ALIAS ALL CAT(mcatname).
Verify the association in this catalog with the association on the system you
can "see" the dataset.
HTH,
BTW. If there is any discrepancy, it may
Comments/opinions interspersed
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Michael Babcock
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2020 1:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Two Processors and One IODF
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trus
m. If you are not the intended recipient you are
notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in
reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2020 12:0
I don't know if the data to too large, but the ISPF EDIT line command TF
("text flow") seems to do what you want. Check the edit line commands in ISPF
Help.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
kekronbekron
Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2020 7:12 AM
To: IBM-M
>However, /usr/lpp is in IBM's Version root which is mounted R/O.
>
>Is it proper to change Version root's mount mode temporarily to R/W and mkdir
>another mountpoint off /usr/lpp for the product I'm installing, or should this
>be avoided and made elsewhere?
-->Yes. I do this all the time.. Remem
Those will drain in a few Daily Space Management Cycles. They are vtoc copies
used in volume recovery.
You can also (with minor risk), just delete them.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Gadi Ben-Avi
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 3:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LIST
The z/OS 2.2 documentation seems to have disappeared from the z/OS internet
Library (again!)
The index is there, but the PDF's seem to have disappeared.
Interestingly, the 2.1 doc is still there and functional.
IBM, clean up your act!
::DISCLAIMER::
The contents
305390754708836&sdata=Q92A7pWg9Q0FRmbSEBbXURFdr6mrZg435t1MPZ6fTmM%3D&reserved=0
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Allan Staller
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2020 12:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OS 2.2 documentation
The z/
t; %7C637305409219093161&sdata=k2DC75IVcNxR6Knx4TJY13zkEHhfq%2FZtwJhR
> 8KfUD3U%3D&reserved=0
>
> Charles
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Allan Staller
> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2
We send everything plain text to the corporate email server and let them handle
it!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Tony Thigpen
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 11:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Sending email from the Mainframe
[CAUTION
OPENSSH is pretty tightly integrated into the /etc file system (separate from
the root file system). I have not head of IBM any maint touching /etc in a long
time.
As long as you don’t replace the /etc physical file , you should be fine.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Disc
S taskname,,,MSGCLASS=(held sysout class)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Nightwatch RenBand
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 11:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Started task stopping immediately. No error messages.
[CAUTION: This Email is
Please post the job log
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 8:45 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: GIMUNZIP error
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the
sender, Don
Your target file is too small. I wanted to see if you were receiving the error
on SMPWRK or the dest file.
The hfs/zfs that contains (/u/hdbswxg/smpnts/U0226/) needs to be cleaned
up or expanded.
If a zfs zfsadm aggrow will suffice. Otherwist just follow the standard
procedures o copy/exp
Compare SMPE Target datasets (e.g. SYS1.LINKLIB) to running datasets. The
modules should be a match for the most part.
If there are 2 different levels, the will be many more mismatches.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
retired mainframer
Sent: Wednesda
SMF/RYO
SMF/MXG
Several others. Check the CBTTAPE.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Lizette Koehler
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2020 3:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Is there a tool to monitor JES2 Input Queue wait time?
[CAUTION: This Email
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2020 1:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Is there a tool to monitor JES2 Input Queue wait time?
SMF/RYO
SMF/MXG
Several others. Check the CBTTAPE.
-Original Message-
From: IBM
II can't speak too much to the excp counts, but re: CPU usage.
Unix systems "count the beans" very differently than z/OS.
The "system overhead" (uncaptured CPU time) for z/OS averages about 10%.
The Unix systems I have encountered routinely exceed 40%.
Perhaps looking at a unix process through a
Is the data set (and dfsms) set up for CA_RECLAIM?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Lizette Koehler
Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2020 5:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Simple VSAM question on sizing INDEX component
[CAUTION: This Email is from
Working for me @ 7"45 AM CST from Texas
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 12:11 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Is www..ibm.com down?
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless y
Classification: HCL Internal
::DISCLAIMER::
The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended
for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be
secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corr
Classification: HCL Internal
Would you allow random updates of the ROOT directory on a *NIX system?. This is
definitely both a integrity and an operational exposure
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Steve Smith
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 11:14
Classification: HCL Internal
Paul,
That is incorrect.
DYNAMIC system symbols were not supported until JES2 V2. (Z/OS 2.1+). The
installation gets to define where symbols are resolved via JESPARMS
STATIC system symbols have been supported for "eons". (e.g. SYSDATE, SYSIME,
SYSUID). Init and Tu
Classification: HCL Internal
As I am sure you know, ACS routines only apply at creation time and don’t have
the power to alter the DSN anyway.
ISTR a (fairly recent (z/OS 1+)) modification that will allow creation and
cataloging of a 2nd dataset with the same name and avoiding the NOT CATLGD 2
Classification: HCL Internal
See my earlier. IMO, the answer is Not Possible
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Brian Westerman
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2020 2:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: rename a dataset in acs routine?
[CAUTION: Thi
Classification: HCL Internal
Don't forget to expire the old tapes after successful copy.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Brian Westerman
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2020 11:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: rename a dataset in acs routin
1) CATALOG s/b RECATALOG(*)
2) I believe a data set of that size must be extended format and SMS managed.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Gadi Ben-Avi
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2019 6:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Moving a large ZFS to ano
STORCLAS(desired storclas) BYPASSACS(**)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Elaine Beal
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2019 11:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFDSS copy to pre-allocated dsn
I'm copying disk to disk.
source file is 2 volumes and
I just went through this. There are 2 "levels" of RACF sharing
SYSPLEX Data Sharing (CF required) and SYSPLEX Communications (no CF required).
SYSPLEX Data Sharing is b'10001100' (x'8C')
SYSPLEX Communication is b'10001000' (x'88').
What you have set up is SYSPLEX Communication. RACF will not be
RESTORE
NSC NMC BPYASSACS(**)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Nai, Dean
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 12:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: ADRDSSU
Hi,
Running a DR test. Trying to restore an SMS managed dataset on a floor
Read up on the SMPE ZONEEDIT command.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Gadi Ben-Avi
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 9:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: delete volume and unit information form DDDEF
Hi,
I have DDDEFs that have volume and unit inf
I prefer to keep the SMP/E targets uncataloged. The prevents inadvertent
updating of any running system. Extremely cheap (but effective) insurance.
The SMP/E targets are used *ONLY* as SMP/E targets and *NEVER* on a running
system.
"Clones" are used by the running system.
My 0.02 USD worth
-
More "new tools", less function, less availability.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jousma, David
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2019 7:20 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: IBM SR going away?
I'm sure many of you have seen this. I'm trying to boil dow
Like I said before. More "new tools", less function, less availability.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed
Jaffe
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2019 10:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM SR going away?
On 6/24/2019 5:59 AM, All
on and function from
the public problem database.
Need I go on?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed
Jaffe
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2019 10:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM SR going away?
On 6/24/2019 8:12 AM, Allan Staller wrot
Nope!
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mark Jacobs
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 6:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Dataset encryption question
Outside of using dataset conditional access rules is there anyway
Perfectly acceptable. IIRC BYPASS(HOLDSYS(.)) automatically generates a CC4
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2019 4:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SMPE APPLY CHECK CC 04
I downloaded Db2 maintenanc
AMATERSE should provide what you want for a "classic" or "unix" file.
Of course this is only useful if the remote site is also z/OS.
AFAIK tar, pax, in Unix System Services are compatible with their non-z/OS
counterparts,
If support for "classic" files in not available, there are OGET, OPUT
*.F1 seems to match the convention for SMP RELFILES. Perhaps you need to run an
accept of the base function, which will clean up the RELFILES.
Not a lot to go on from the info provided.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Monda
You should be able to accept the base functions with a minimum of additional
maintenance.
In my shop, I would:
Accept the base functions and any required maintenance. ACCEPT CHECK S(FMID1,
FMID2,..). Resolve any error holds. This will of course require that the
.F* files be recalled.
Accept
You might get a RC8 from the accept related to deleting the files. Otherwise
you should be OK.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2019 9:04 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: zOSMF software validation lookin
IIRC, the RELFILEs are not used in the accept process. You can just allocate
them if they are lost.
Kurt Q, Can you comment?
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: Allan Staller
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2019 8:59 AM
To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: RE: zOSMF software validation looking
Immediately after the successful apply of the FMID's
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2019 9:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: zOSMF software validation looking for *.F files
Thinking forward to my v1
ACCEPT will absolutely clean up the relfiles. I do not recall if there is an
SMPE configuration option to override this.
If DB2 V12 is installed in the same SMPE environment as DB2 V11, I expect
problems.
The SMPE MCS for DB2V12 FMIDs most likely contains ++DELETE statements for
DB2V11 FMIDS.
You can use the NOPURGE to ACCEPT SYSMODS into the first DLIB
zones then change to PURGE to accept into the last DLIB.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2019 10:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subjec
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2019 10:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External] Re: zOSMF software validation looking for *.F files
Perhaps that will solve the OP's problem.
Run the accept w/NOPURGE and then manu
1) change the auto mount convention to include a system symbols (e.g.
&SYSUID..&SYSNAME..USER.ZFS) and rename all *.*.USER.ZFS as needed.
2) Investigate OMVS SYSPLEX sharing. One file will be used for all
participating images.
See the USS Planning Guide for details.
-Original Message-
F
ibution library. Any aliases
specified for such a module must exist in the LKLIB or relative file in order
to be copied.
I am pretty sure he won't be able to ACCEPT DB2 11 unless/until he can find the
missing RELFILES.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
LIST SYSMOD FUNCTION on the target zone.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2019 4:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: getting a list of FMIDS and the product description
I am trying to get a list of the FM
Check the service your SSH client is receiving.
If I understand the reported symptoms, you can get this behavior if z/OS does
not dispatch the SSH Client.
Many of the same items vis-à-vis (network and FTP) also apply to SSH.
Routing?
Class of Service?
What is happening at time of observed issues
tp client software either free or
commercial we can look at? All involved think it's the open ssh client because
it's the only one having the problem, well that we know of.
Thanks
Matt
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent
The whole discussion seems to me to be the typical Ivory Tower pontification.
Does they even realize, that despite Mobile Access the transactions are
still being processed by a Mainframe?
Remember, the last mainframe was supposed to be turned off in 1995 or
thereabouts!
-Original M
Try ACCEPT CHECK GROUPEXTEND. It might reduce the number of passes.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2019 10:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMPE ACCEPT options
Thank you for your help!
So I am tr
It is a common practice to back up everything before the accept.
In my case, the entire SMP/e ENV is on one volume, so I just use df/dss.
Any method that works for the backup is acceptable.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Wednesda
Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2019 11:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: SMPE ACCEPT options
It is a common practice to back up everything before the accept.
In my case, the entire SMP/e ENV is on one volume, so I just use df/dss
The might be some issues w/volume of the type 80's collected. Otherwise it
works fine.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2019 4:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMF for cataloged procedures and
101 - 200 of 1177 matches
Mail list logo
