On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 08:03:59 -0500 Bill Giannelli
wrote:
:>How do I resolve a 0C1 abend. what is normally the cause?
For high level languages, usually missing DD statement or missing subroutine.
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
-
Hi Binyamin AMV"SH,
My experience with missing DD Statements in HLLs has been x13 ABENDs.
Regards,
David
On 2023-07-02 05:13, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 08:03:59 -0500 Bill Giannelli
wrote:
:>How do I resolve a 0C1 abend. what is normally the cause?
For high level languages, u
On Sun, 2 Jul 2023 06:11:24 -0400 David Spiegel
<0468385049d1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
:>Hi Binyamin AMV"SH,
:>My experience with missing DD Statements in HLLs has been x13 ABENDs.
A missing DD doesn't directly cause the abend. A READ / WRITE to an unopened
file causes a branch t
Here goes:
Me: Describe the impacts of either disabling the RLSE subparameter of
SPACE= in z/OS JCL on RAID drives or having RLSE only release unused
extends on RAID drives. Consider the savings in avoiding unnecessary VTOC
updates. Which is better, changing RLSE to only release unused extends, or
Thanks all. Attempting to reply to everyone in one note so as not to add to the
noise.
@Gil:
> 8 seconds after the source. That's astonishing if it's a system header.
It is a user header. They are both uploaded more or less at the same time, with
FileZilla, which I think sets a new timestamp r
Thanks for merging replies. It's irritating when a contributor replies to
multiple plies, in sequence, oblivious that the question has already
been subsequently answered.
On Sun, 2 Jul 2023 07:41:11 -0500, Charles Mills wrote:
>It is a user header. They are both uploaded more or less at the same
On 2/7/2023 8:41 pm, Charles Mills wrote:
@David:
Looks like a but with XL C++. I would open a case with IBM
Alas, I am but a red-headed stepchild. Dallas and PDT customers cannot even
search APARs (which makes NO sense to me) much less open cases.
That's interesting. I was of the understandin
Yes, @David, perhaps the PDT entitles us to search cases. I shall look into
that.
I am pretty certain that we cannot open cases nor even order PTFs. We have to
wait for the "bucket" that comes out from time to time.
I am also quite certain that a Dallas contract give us no access to APARs --
o
On 7/2/2023 7:52 AM, David Crayford wrote:
That's interesting. I was of the understanding that PDT customers were
IBM business partners, in which case had to have access to
Partnerworld and had full access to services to open cases. I now
that's certainly the case for other ISVs that use Dallas
zPDT clients can open tickets and order PTFs. I just did it last week for
the certificate issue we had.
ITschak
--
ITschak Mugzach
*|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Continuous Monitoring
for z/OS, x/Linux & IBM I **| z/VM coming soon *
-
Ed is correct. If you don't license IBM mainframe hardware, you can't get
full z/OS support. ISVs using zPDT as their sole z/OS development host
can't report problems OR get formal tech support for z/OS. We adapt...
Mike Shaw
MVS/QuickRef Support Group
Chicago-Soft, Ltd.
On Sun, Jul 2, 2023 at 1
Not true. ZPDT users can open tickets and access shops for ptfs.
ITschak
בתאריך יום א׳, 2 ביולי 2023 ב-19:59 מאת Mike Shaw :
> Ed is correct. If you don't license IBM mainframe hardware, you can't get
> full z/OS support. ISVs using zPDT as their sole z/OS development host
> can't report problem
Itschak,
How? Calling the support center? They always ask for a CPU serial number.
Are you an ISV?
Mike Shaw
MVS/QuickRef Support Group
Chicago-Soft, Ltd.
On Sun, Jul 2, 2023 at 1:18 PM ITschak Mugzach wrote:
> Not true. ZPDT users can open tickets and access shops for ptfs.
>
> ITschak
>
> ב
Yes. We are an is. (IronSphere). Last week was not the first time we opened
a ticket. Below is the letter I received from IBM before opening the first
ticket:
Dear zPDT user,
The entitlement of your PartnerWorld location ID has been updated to
include the ability to report defects in z/OS product
Mike
Since then I opened tickets directly at ibm support portal and not from
partner world
ITschak
בתאריך יום א׳, 2 ביולי 2023 ב-20:50 מאת Itschak Mugzach <
i_mugz...@securiteam.co.il>:
> Yes. We are an is. (IronSphere). Last week was not the first time we
> opened a ticket. Below is the letter
Itschak,
Ok. We received no such letter and we are partnerworld members and an ISV
using the ADCD on a zPDT system. This is news to us.
I see that it is for use only to report defects in the ADCD system.
Thanks for that info.
Mike Shaw
MVS/QuickRef Support Group
Chicago-Soft, Ltd.
On Sun, Jul
This is the link where I open tickets with IBM (zPDT 1090-L01 box) :
https://www.ibm.com/mysupport/s/createrecord/NewCase?productId=flatitem&language=en_US
Best,
ITschak
*| **Itschak Mugzach | Director | SecuriTeam Software **|** IronSphere
Platform* *|* *Information Security Continuous Monitorin
On 7/2/2023 10:50 AM, Itschak Mugzach wrote:
Yes. We are an is. (IronSphere).
Every zPDT has a unique CPU type/serial. It makes sense IBM could open
up this entitlement for zPDT users.
I'm still puzzled how RDC customers in Dallas could do so. I'm not
saying it can't be done, but am interes
> On Jun 27, 2023, at 6:43 AM, rpinion865
> <042a019916dd-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> Remember the days when you could purchase mainframe software? In 1987 we
> had UCC-1, UCC-7, and UCC-11. And we had just gotten ACF2, which had just
> been acquired by Uccel. The instruct
Besides having ServerPac back, I want no background checking down.
I want batch jobs built to allocate everything, IF a newbie want to trust the
process awesome. But in my 38 years, opps doesn’t cut it.
Again, just give me a switch. Allow the scripts to build the batch jobs and I
will verify
Hi Terri,
If you have a 14 inch monitor, it is time to invest in your career and
get a proper monitor (e.g. 27 inch minimum).
If you're seeing 3-4 lines, it also means that you're probably using
Model 2 emulation (24x80). Model 2 for a SysProg wastes a lot of time
with unnecessarily scrolling,
Amazing for 38 years, I have never used anything bigger than 14" PC monitor. My
24x80 saves my eyes at age 60, that I don't need glasses.. So that's a poor
excuse.
Ms Terri E Shaffer
Senior Systems Engineer,
z/OS Support:
ACIWorldwide - Telecommuter
H(412-766-2697) C(412-519-2592)
terri.shaf...@
HI Terri,
My grandpa drove a Model T ... Should I also drive one?
(I'm 67 and have been wearing glasses for almost 55 years. This is
irrelevant.)
Regards,
David
On 2023-07-02 21:19, Shaffer, Terri wrote:
Amazing for 38 years, I have never used anything bigger than 14" PC monitor. My
24x80 sa
Bigger monitor + larger 3270 screen format = same size type.
Large monitors are under $200.
It's your right to stick with 80's display technology but it's not IBM's fault
that you then have a problem with more modern screen layouts.
Charles
On Mon, 3 Jul 2023 01:19:24 +, Shaffer, Terri
w
I'm a bit perplexed here.
I'm using XL C and the strcasecmp function. I've included and added
the #define for _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED as documented in the library
reference, as shown below. But I still get a warning message for it.
#define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED 1
#include
CCN4421 ... I
Not sure what is relevant to your situation and what is not, but FWIW (for C++)
I use the following and get no messages on strcasecmp().
#define _LARGE_TIME_API
#define _OPEN_SYS_UNLOCKED_EXT 1
#define _POSIX_SOURCE
#define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED 1
#define
Best investment I made WFH is a $250 43" 4K TV used as a monitor.6 - 8
viewable windows at the same time, plus ergonomic while not having to do a
cranium swivel between multiple monitors.
.And a tan at the same time...
Second best investment was bifocals cut for 18" monitor and closer for readi
Throughout my career, my definitions of large and small monitors kept
shifting; where once 17" was something to aspire to, I now consider it to be
tiny, and where once 4Kx4K was "if you have to ask you can't afford it", now
"8K UHD" is merely expensive.
While I have small legacy laptops and am
24x80 is something that I may have been forced into at work but would never
accept on a PC that I conrol. Likewise 14". I currently have a 32" UHD monitor
an am considerong 43". YMMV.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Ma
29 matches
Mail list logo
