Throughout my career, my definitions of large and small monitors kept shifting; where once 17" was something to aspire to, I now consider it to be tiny, and where once 4Kx4K was "if you have to ask you can't afford it", now "8K UHD" is merely expensive.
While I have small legacy laptops and am force to use small screens for work, It's been decades since I purchased anything smaller than 21". -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Charles Mills [charl...@mcn.org] Sent: Sunday, July 2, 2023 9:38 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: z/OSMF Bigger monitor + larger 3270 screen format = same size type. Large monitors are under $200. It's your right to stick with 80's display technology but it's not IBM's fault that you then have a problem with more modern screen layouts. Charles On Mon, 3 Jul 2023 01:19:24 +0000, Shaffer, Terri <terri.shaf...@aciworldwide.com> wrote: >Amazing for 38 years, I have never used anything bigger than 14" PC monitor. >My 24x80 saves my eyes at age 60, that I don't need glasses.. So that's a poor >excuse. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
