Some comments inserted, very basic ones though, but overall, you can do pretty
much all of what you require...
On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 08:16:30 +1300, Laurence Chiu wrote:
>That's very interesting.
>
>Looks like the personal edition might be a good tool to get new developers
>familiar with the envi
When is this area obtained and freed? I.e. is this area unique for each
invocation of IEFU86, or unique for each individual record, or "global".
I'm wondering if I can put something in it on one invocation of IEFU86 and
access it in a different invocation.
Standard response, which applies here t
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 7:26 AM Peter Relson wrote:
>
> When is this area obtained and freed? I.e. is this area unique for each
> invocation of IEFU86, or unique for each individual record, or "global".
> I'm wondering if I can put something in it on one invocation of IEFU86 and
> access it in a
On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 07:30:42 -0500, John McKown wrote:
>OK, I'll remember that. "That which is not specifically allowed is
>forbidden."
More like "That which is not documented as working in a particular
way cannot be assumed to work in that way, even if testing seems
to show that it works that
> Is there a support forum for zPDT and/or zD&T?
You might check "groups.yahoo.com/group/z1090" for zPDT, although I
believe some zD&T users appear there also.
Bill
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instr
Yep and everyone is great
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 9:52 AM Bill Ogden wrote:
> > Is there a support forum for zPDT and/or zD&T?
>
> You might check "groups.yahoo.com/group/z1090" for zPDT, although I
> believe some zD&T users appear there also.
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> ---
@Peter, it is not so documented, but is it safe to assume that one has
exclusive use of a given work area for the duration of the exit routine's
execution? In other words, that the work area might be reused later, but is
not shared among several tasks or processors? The documentation does not say
t
Yep I agree with Sebastian . The Redbooks are great and accurate for
installation and maintaining z/PDT
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 5:06 AM Sebastian Welton
wrote:
> Some comments inserted, very basic ones though, but overall, you can do
> pretty much all of what you require...
>
> On Fri, 11 Oct 20
For an existing PDS, what's the best way to get this?
Do you just have to open the directory and count?
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
Frank:
We are in Partnerworld , this one is new to me . I *ASSUME ( I know ) that
the customer has to have the Linux hardware for the Deploys , etc.
Can someone from IBM confirm this ? My assumption is you could run on
another host environment ...
Scott
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 7:42 PM Frank Swar
Kirk,
I know TSO LISTDSI will provide a lot of information ...dir blocks used ,
max allocated ..wii this help ?
Scott
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:41 AM Kirk Wolf wrote:
> For an existing PDS, what's the best way to get this?
> Do you just have to open the directory and count?
>
> Kirk Wolf
> D
Thanks, but TSO commands are not the kind of programming interface that I
can use. Looking for an access method, generally callable service, etc.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 10:44 AM scott Ford wrote:
> Kirk,
>
> I know TSO LISTDSI will provide a lot of information ...dir blocks used ,
> max all
Isn't it in the DSCB? Possibly easier than counting.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Kirk Wolf
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2019 8:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Best programming interface to get PDS
Tried the CSI interface? I know it’s callable via REXX. Might be
available via ASM. It’s doc’d in the SMS books
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 10:53 AM Kirk Wolf wrote:
> Thanks, but TSO commands are not the kind of programming interface that I
> can use. Looking for an access method, generally c
I get the following error message
IZE0106E connect failed with “Error to launch server on 192.86.32.184 using
dameon running on port 4035” (192.86.32.64)
192.86.32.64 is the up address of the z/os system
> On Oct 10, 2019, at 10:22 PM, Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
>
> In z/OS Explorer go to
Do you have the RSED task up and listening on port 4035?
_
Dave Jousma
AVP | Manager, Systems Engineering
Fifth Third Bank | 1830 East Paris Ave, SE | MD RSCB2H | Grand Rapids, MI
49546
61
On 10/11/2019 11:41 AM, Kirk Wolf wrote:
For an existing PDS, what's the best way to get this?
Do you just have to open the directory and count?
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Not sure what that is I’ll look into it
Thanks
Joe Reichman
170-10 73 rd ave
Fresh meadows NY 11366
> On Oct 11, 2019, at 12:44 PM, Jousma, David
> <01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> Do you have the RSED task up and listening on port 4035?
>
> ___
Look in your SFEK* datasets (SYS1.FEK.SFEK* on my system). There is
configuration settings that usually live in /etc, a fair amount of security
setup for RSED and JMON started tasks. Then, you will need to configure the
IPVSRV task that comes in the SIPV* datasets (SYS1.IPV.SIVP* on my syste
Corrected a typo...
_
Dave Jousma
AVP | Manager, Systems Engineering
Fifth Third Bank | 1830 East Paris Ave, SE | MD RSCB2H | Grand Rapids, MI
49546
616.653.8429 | fax: 616.653.2717
-
The customer has to provide the host Linux environment. The images will vary
depending on where you sourced your images. There is no magic on creating the
customized environments. Someone needs to define the resources (IMS, tables,
load modules,...). This could be the system programmer or the
So, we took a peek at licensing zD&T. We did a trial on it, and stood a
couple instances up. As others have mentioned, it is the ADCD image, and has
all products. The "problem" for us, is that we don’t have an all blue
software stack.So to do anything meaningful, that might resemble wh
You just expressed all of my concerns. I personally would be happy to do a lot
of "systemish" things in this environment, but I can't imagine it makes sense
for most developers.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Jousma, David <01a0403c5dc1-d
Thanks for all who responded here and off-line.
I don't need it for PDSE, only PDS.
Without going through another product like TSO, ISPF, etc, it seems that
you can only get this using two methods:
- read the directory, counting blocks
- use FAMS ($$ doc licensed $$)
Since the information itself
I think a win-win ..in my eyes
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 3:00 PM Jesse 1 Robinson
wrote:
> I believe that it's a good thing for all of us even though I have no
> direct connection to JES3. More than one sysprog I've encountered at SHARE
> has related more or less this story:
>
> My management is ir
OPEN and count is so easy that it's not worth while looking for alternatives
unless you need to support PDSE. Is there a count option in DESREVE?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
One of our developers wants to start testing this, PTFs (and all the PE fixing
ones too) are applied, but when he uses the new keywords in IDCAMS they're not
recognized. The APAR says the new function ships disabled, with an enabling
APAR shipping later. Does anyone know about the enabling APAR
On 2019-10-11, at 12:49:37, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> OPEN and count is so easy that it's not worth while looking for alternatives
> unless you need to support PDSE. Is there a count option in DESREVE?
>
Don't know about DESERV. ISPF Info says no limit (it's dynamic). For
compatibility, PDSE
For member count, yes; the GET_ALL function even when applied to a PDS returns
# DESB's, 1 DESB per member, assuming just one PDS is allocated in a DD. No
way to get maximum directory blocks (which is unlimited for PDSE after all).
So Kirk and Shmuel are both correct, the only and easiest way
I found for 2.3
OA53690: NEW FUNCTION - VSAMDB
* R230 PSY UA97650
UP18/10/25 P F810
*
UA97650 is for 2.3 I think
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Jacobs" <0224d287a4b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, Octo
That APAR/PTF adds support to DFDSSS for the new function, not what I'm
needing. Thanks though.
PROBLEM SUMMARY:
* USERS AFFECTED: *
* All users of DFSMSdss HDZ2210 and above.
• Enabling support for VSAMDB is available through PTFs for APAR OA55153 on
z/OS V2.2 and later
From:
https://ibm-zcouncil.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/zOS-Performance-Hot-Topics.pdf
First Tennessee Bank
Mainframe Technical Support
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
Thanks. The enabling PTFs aren't available yet.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&search=markjac...@protonmail.com
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, October 11, 2019 3:37 PM, Jackson, Rob
wro
So I noticed in SIS after I sent the first response. And the APAR has been
open a year and a half; must be a bear of a new function (reads like it is).
That, and they have probably outsourced DFP support and development to
Activision by now. Nothing would surprise me anymore.
First Tennessee
You can use ISPF =3.2 to check how many directory blocks are currently
allocated to your PDS, and use PDSMAN (if you have it) to allocate more
directory blocks.
You can run PGM=IEBGENER, pointing SYSUT1 at the PDS and SYSUT2 at a
sequential output dataset (with RECFM=FB, LRECL=256, and [it used
As David says. You need the RSED server/Daemon running. Also make sure your
TCPIP profile has the ports enabled. If you are using CICS Explorer, you'll
need the ports and TCPIPService configured too.
It's not a trivial task to set all this up. You will need to configure some
BPX.** FACILITY classe
RGEN in SDSF has some useful templates.
I've built a few useful utilities using RGEN as a base. I'll take alook at
Lionel's utilities too. Looks great.
My latest (most useful to our shop) is using REXX/SDSF to find a writer ID
from Tivoli Workload Scheduler output collector and write it out to a
That doesn't sound promising. My thought was to use the environment
development (Cobol and some Assembler), target CICS with VSAM and DB2.
This is a RACF shop with third party SCM.
Then the developers might get better response time for their development
and test batch jobs. I certainly would not e
38 matches
Mail list logo
