I have a target zone for each sysres set and a dlib zone for each dlib set. If
I need to add maint (even just one ptf) to a res system, but don't want to
change an already existing one, I clone the existing sysres set and target zone
and zoneedit the pack names. My catalogs are always set up t
I should have mentioned that I also have a single global zone for everything
at that particular site. The only time I change global zones is when I install
a new OS release. It's not that I have to, I just do it that way so that I
don't get things mixed up.
Brian
---
Mike,
My guess for the MCDS data component free percentages:
In the listcat of the MCDS you will have something similar to;
FREESPC517779456
HI-A-RBA---662077440
HI-U-RBA---173260800
*Actual Free Space*
The lower percentage free space figure will be: (HI-A-RBA - HI-U-RBA) /
H
to maintain 2 different maintenance levels I want to clone my target and dlib.
would this require 2 separate CSIs? And would I have to 2 copies of most of the
dddefs?
thanks
Bill
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive acc
I usually keep 4 different sets of target CSI and Just one DLIB(As we
accept the previous maintenance only when the previous maintenance has
baked for some time )
TG1,TG2,TG3,TG4.
So on the cloning process one qualifier matching to CSI name ..
On Thu, 14 Mar, 2019, 3:08 PM Bill Giannelli,
wro
so for each cloned target I need a separate CSI?
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 8:20 AM Jake Anderson
wrote:
> I usually keep 4 different sets of target CSI and Just one DLIB(As we
> accept the previous maintenance only when the previous maintenance has
> baked for some time )
>
> TG1,TG2,TG3,TG4.
>
>
Target 2 CSI
Dlib -1 CSI
On Thu, 14 Mar, 2019, 4:36 PM william giannelli,
wrote:
> so for each cloned target I need a separate CSI?
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 8:20 AM Jake Anderson
> wrote:
>
> > I usually keep 4 different sets of target CSI and Just one DLIB(As we
> > accept the previous main
One Global, two Targets, one DLIB, that's what I've done in a previous shop,
for products only,that was the standard, the target zone was named for the
sysplex, and the DDDEF's reflected the Plex name in the target datasets in that
zone, so my plex name was PLEX1 lets say, so my zone names were
Hi Carmen,
You said: "... 1980's, that's what I came into all system catalogs were
on the sysres, all uss HFS and ZFS were on the sysres ..."
OMVS was not available until the mid '90s.
Regards,
David
On 2019-03-14 09:00, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
> One Global, two Targets, one DLIB, that's what I'v
I think you get the just of what I was saying, that technique, or method of
keeping everything on the sysres (for some), trying not to put my foot in my
mouth again, moved forward with the advent of OpenMVS.
the sysprog I replaced had everything on the sysres, so cloning or maintain
gwas more d
OK, but during the '80s, there were no system symbolics like &SYSR2.
With the advent of that, larger DASD volumes (i.e. 3390 MOD 9, 27 and
54) and larger Datasets, the SysProg no longer had to cram everything on
1 DASD Volume.
On 2019-03-14 09:49, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
> I think you get the just
OK, but during the '80s, there were no System Symbols like &SYSR2.
With the advent of that, larger DASD volumes (i.e. 3390 MOD 9, 27 and
54) and larger Datasets, the SysProg no longer had to cram everything on
1 DASD Volume.
On 2019-03-14 09:49, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
> I think you get the just o
W dniu 2019-03-13 o 17:17, Longnecker, Dennis pisze:
I've seen the information on how to get z/os data available via SMB to a
Windows machine, but haven't seen anything on how to get the z/os side to send
a file to a windows SMB.
Trying to get a bunch of mainframe files over to a Windows share
W dniu 2019-03-13 o 20:09, Don Leahy pisze:
"Withdrawal of ISPF Workstation Agent (WSA)
z/OS V2.4 is planned to be the last release to support the ISPF Workstation
Agent (WSA), also known as the ISPF Client/Server Component. WSA is an
application that runs on your local workstation and maintains
If you issue
F dfhsm-stc-name,Q CDS it will show storage allocations for the files.
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
> Richard Marchant
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 4:01 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: hsm questio
Anyone have any real-world experience with SMT?
We have very high zIIP usage, 70% to 80% across 3 zIIPs, right now and have
been asked to evaluate turning on SMT.
One response was that with high zIIP usage, SMT might not be as effective as
could be, and the other response is that it will make
we tested with a single zIIP and turned it off quickly.
We were eventually able to convert one spare CP to a second zIIP, and turned it
on again on our secondary prod LPAR which was mostly all DB2 DDF type
processing, both PROD1 and PROD2 were almost alway on the CAP, we saw some
minor improvem
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 06:08:01 -0500, Bill Giannelli wrote:
>to maintain 2 different maintenance levels I want to clone my target and dlib.
>would this require 2 separate CSIs? And would I have to 2 copies of most of
>the dddefs?
Strictly speaking, you do not need a separate CSI for each zone. Yo
Probably the overwhelming consideration is thread speed sensitivity. DDF
probably OK with it, DBM1 Client SRBs likewise. Java batch jobs possibly
not OK.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ib
If you want to be able to do maintenance on the target volumes then you need
target zones. Whether to have a separate CSI for each pair of target/dlib
depends on your backup strategy.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM M
I prefer to have each target/dlib pair is a separate CSI; that simplifies
backup. Thee are arguments in favor of only having one dlib zone for a given
srel; I don't find the case compelling, but others do. Wht is critical is that
you have a target zone for every sysres set that you might need to
That's how I like to operate, with one variation: I prefer to rotate among
sysres sets rather than cloning and deleting, and I don't dedicate a sysres set
to one LPAR except when I'm in the process of promoting a testing a new level.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
__
I mean SMS-managed tapes, and possible entries in DEVSUPxx member, for
example default
MEDIA11 =000B
(this is default for JC media, also called EATC)
Question: where the category is recorded?
AFAIR it is recorde in the ATL, that means Library Manager (PC inside
the library).
However is it reco
Mike,
Yes, you should be able to delete the logs outside of hsm. I don't think it
keeps track of those. The log retention is usually governed ty the management
class; so, look into that.
To check the space on hsm cds files: HSEND Q CDS
That command will give the the space allocation of the ocd
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 19:13:44 +, Styles, Andy (ITS zPlatform Services) wrote:
>
>Yes, I spotted this too. I've been too busy to spare time to think about it,
>but I too use it for seamless file transfer to/from my laptop, and would miss
>that functionality. I suspect IBM would be pushing other
Hello All
Right now I am running serverpac for zOS 2.3 from the driving system LPAR
LOPB on z14 hardware.
The target system name is also LOPB and I will be IPLING from z114.
This is for just test purpose I am doing as recently we moved from z114 to
z14.
Our storage box are still connected to b
I never used WSA as a file transfer application, only to run parallel ISPF
sessions. If they open sourced that piece of it I'd be happy.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilm
I welcome your comments, suggestions, etc. about the IBM SFG Product.
Thank You!
Len Sasso
System Administrator
General Dynamics Information Technology
327 Columbia TPKE
Rensselaer, NY 12144
Phone: (518) 257-4209
Cell: (518) 894-0879
Fax: (518) 257-4300
len.sa...@gdit.com
URL: www.gdit.com
This
W dniu 2019-03-14 o 18:53, Peter pisze:
Hello All
Right now I am running serverpac for zOS 2.3 from the driving system LPAR
LOPB on z14 hardware.
The target system name is also LOPB and I will be IPLING from z114.
This is for just test purpose I am doing as recently we moved from z114 to
z14.
I so mentally interpolated an "sh" in there :-).
I always wanted to like WSA, but it seemed very clunky vs. my
expectations. I never thought of it as a file transfer tool, merely as a
way to edit locally.
sas
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 1:59 PM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> I never used WSA as a file t
ObGungaDin It was clunky; it badly needed multi-line and block copy. But it was
better than nothing.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Steve Smith
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 2
SFG
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Sasso, Len
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 1:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: IBM SFG - Your Opinion
Importance: High
I welcome your comments, suggestions, etc. about the IBM SFG Product.
Thank You!
Sterling File Gateway (Managed File Transfer Product)
Thank You!
Len Sasso
System Administrator
General Dynamics Information Technology
327 Columbia TPKE
Rensselaer, NY 12144
Phone: (518) 257-4209
Cell: (518) 894-0879
Fax: (518) 257-4300
len.sa...@gdit.com
URL: www.gdit.com
-Original Mes
It's extremely powerful but oh so onerous to install, maintain, and administer.
They will push implementation services, and you will wish you'd bought them
before it's over if you go it on your own.
What are you planning on doing with it? If it is just MFT, I would highly
recommend taking a g
We will be doing SFTP. IBM is installing and we will be working with them to
implement. We just got Connect:Direct about 1.5 years ago. We are getting
SFG/SI, SSP, SEAS and CC. Yes, there sure are "a lot of pieces."
Thank You!
Len Sasso
System Administrator
General Dynamics Information Techno
IBM z/OS OpenSSH is included with z/OS, and it includes SFTP.
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Techologies
http://dovetail.com
PS> if you need z/OS data sets, spool files, etc, etc, you can also use
Co:Z SFTP, which does SMF, console notification logging, exits, etc, etc.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 2:32 PM Sass
This is relating to doing SFTP transfers with SFG. If you use SSP for reverse
proxy for SFG, which is highly recommended, then you pretty much must use SEAS
to look up passwords/keys with LDAP for SFTP clients.
First Tennessee Bank
Mainframe Technical Support
-Original Message-
From: I
There are better designs than allocating storage at the explicit address in
most cases (fork being the primary exception).
If it's the case that Kees mentioned of having a shared block that is allocated
on first use (assuming you have good serialization), then use name tokens
instead. A hard-co
On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 21:35:31 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>... (I want Bookie back!)
>
Interesting that the pdfinfo tells me:
Antenna House PDF Output Library 6.5.1119 (Linux64)
... and:
https://www.antennahouse.com/
... suggests that they were converted from something else. Word? Bookie
On 3/14/2019 7:07 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 21:35:31 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
... (I want Bookie back!)
Interesting that the pdfinfo tells me:
Antenna House PDF Output Library 6.5.1119 (Linux64)
... and:
https://www.antennahouse.com/
... suggests that they wer
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 21:40:18 -0400, Mike Shaw at QUICKREF wrote:
>On 3/14/2019 7:07 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 21:35:31 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>>
>>> ... (I want Bookie back!)
>>>
>> Interesting that the pdfinfo tells me:
>> Antenna House PDF Output Library 6.5.1119
My recommendation is to leave SMT turned off until you have a defined need for
it. Then when/if you turn it on, evaluate both application responsiveness as
well as the standard SMT measurement values. And then generally keep an eye on
those values over time.
With SMT enabled, understanding effe
42 matches
Mail list logo
