OK, but during the '80s, there were no System Symbols like &SYSR2. With the advent of that, larger DASD volumes (i.e. 3390 MOD 9, 27 and 54) and larger Datasets, the SysProg no longer had to cram everything on 1 DASD Volume.
On 2019-03-14 09:49, Carmen Vitullo wrote: > I think you get the just of what I was saying, that technique, or method of > keeping everything on the sysres (for some), trying not to put my foot in my > mouth again, moved forward with the advent of OpenMVS. > the sysprog I replaced had everything on the sysres, so cloning or maintain > gwas more difficult than needed to be IMO. > > > "not that there's anything wrong with that" :) > > > Carmen Vitullo > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "David Spiegel" <dspiegel...@hotmail.com> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 8:34:16 AM > Subject: Re: cloning target and dlib zones > > Hi Carmen, > You said: "... 1980's, that's what I came into all system catalogs were > on the sysres, all uss HFS and ZFS were on the sysres ..." > > OMVS was not available until the mid '90s. > > Regards, > David > > On 2019-03-14 09:00, Carmen Vitullo wrote: >> One Global, two Targets, one DLIB, that's what I've done in a previous shop, >> for products only,that was the standard, the target zone was named for the >> sysplex, and the DDDEF's reflected the Plex name in the target datasets in >> that zone, so my plex name was PLEX1 lets say, so my zone names were TPLEX1 >> and TPLEX2, for example, and the target dataset names were some >> hlq.vendor.product.TPLEX1 or 2. dsntype. >> like I said that was a standard at this shop, we maintained a PROGxx member >> for each system in the PLEX, if APF is required both PLEX1 and PLEX2 are >> listed, when applying maint in each system that systems PROG00 linklist or >> other places were updated to the currently applied target library. >> I would only apply to the second zone once 1) the maint made it around the >> PLEX, 2) no issues were found during testing/prod, so one receive, 2 >> applies, 1 accept. >> >> >> everyone has their favorite way of maintaining a system or product, some >> because that's how they learned, some because they developed a methodology >> that works well for them that will provide the ability to maintain the >> system or product, provide an easy backout if problems and an easy was to >> clone (if necessary). I've worked with and for Global Services the way we >> maintained a customer site was very much different than another outsourcer I >> worked for, and much different that the site I'm currently working at, right >> or wrong, it's the way that works for me, and I've documented the process >> from receiving a new order, to installing that order thru migration and >> maint process. >> think 1980's, that's what I came into all system catalogs were on the >> sysres, all uss HFS and ZFS were on the sysres, sys1.proclib, and >> sys1.ibm.proclib ,sys1.parmlib, and sys1.ibm.parmlib , no iplparm :( >> so each library was modified for each system so caution was required when >> merging the updates from the order libraries. >> >> >> >> Carmen Vitullo >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> From: "william giannelli" <billgianne...@gmail.com> >> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 7:25:44 AM >> Subject: Re: cloning target and dlib zones >> >> so for each cloned target I need a separate CSI? >> >> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 8:20 AM Jake Anderson <justmainfra...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I usually keep 4 different sets of target CSI and Just one DLIB(As we >>> accept the previous maintenance only when the previous maintenance has >>> baked for some time ) >>> >>> TG1,TG2,TG3,TG4. >>> >>> So on the cloning process one qualifier matching to CSI name .. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 14 Mar, 2019, 3:08 PM Bill Giannelli, <billgianne...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> to maintain 2 different maintenance levels I want to clone my target and >>>> dlib. would this require 2 separate CSIs? And would I have to 2 copies of >>>> most of the dddefs? >>>> thanks >>>> Bill >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>>> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >>>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> . >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > . > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
