CFEngine Help: Authentication dialogue failed, After upgrade to 3.2.0

2011-08-29 Thread no-reply
Forum: CFEngine Help Subject: Authentication dialogue failed, After upgrade to 3.2.0 Author: ryanwilliams Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,23248,23248#msg-23248 I used yum to upgrade a client from cfengine-commuinity-3.1.5 to cfengine-community-3.2.0 Now my client(s) refuses t

CFEngine Help: Re: error in mail, difference when running cf-agent manualy

2011-08-29 Thread no-reply
Forum: CFEngine Help Subject: Re: error in mail, difference when running cf-agent manualy Author: tuibelgium Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,23228,23249#msg-23249 When I run cf-agent -f failsafe.cf && cf-agent, I can see the error. "immediate()" is defined in cfengine-stdlib.c

CFEngine Help: Re: New features of CFEngine 3.2.0

2011-08-29 Thread no-reply
Forum: CFEngine Help Subject: Re: New features of CFEngine 3.2.0 Author: msvob...@linkedin.com Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,23247,23250#msg-23250 Eystein This is Cfengine gold. Thank you so much for your time to write this up.

CFEngine Help: Re: error in mail, difference when running cf-agent manualy

2011-08-29 Thread no-reply
Forum: CFEngine Help Subject: Re: error in mail, difference when running cf-agent manualy Author: neilhwatson Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,23228,23251#msg-23251 Typically one copies any required bodies from the standard library to failsafe.cf or update.cf. Don't forget to

Re: CFEngine Help: Re: New features of CFEngine 3.2.0

2011-08-29 Thread Nick Anderson
On 08/29/2011 06:38 AM, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote: > Forum: CFEngine Help > Subject: Re: New features of CFEngine 3.2.0 > Author: msvob...@linkedin.com > Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,23247,23250#msg-23250 > > Eystein Great, thanks Eystein. I was going to ask if you were

RE: CFEngine Help: Re: Why does CFEngine 3.2.0 consider running a process_stop command as a promise kept?

2011-08-29 Thread Jerome Yanga
Neil, I am testing the community version at the moment. Hence, the need for Cygwin. Regards, j -Original Message- From: help-cfengine-boun...@cfengine.org [mailto:help-cfengine-boun...@cfengine.org] On Behalf Of no-re...@cfengine.com Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 6:06 PM To: help-cfeng

RE: CFEngine Help: Re: CFEngine Help: in version 3.2.0, client is not pulling changes in policy server's masterfiles

2011-08-29 Thread Jerome Yanga
Thank you, Nakarin. Regards, j -Original Message- From: help-cfengine-boun...@cfengine.org [mailto:help-cfengine-boun...@cfengine.org] On Behalf Of no-re...@cfengine.com Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2011 4:05 PM To: help-cfengine@cfengine.org Subject: CFEngine Help: Re: CFEngine Help: in v

Re: CFEngine Help: Re: error in mail, difference when running cf-agent manualy

2011-08-29 Thread Nicolas Charles
On 29/08/2011 11:21, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote: > Forum: CFEngine Help > Subject: Re: error in mail, difference when running cf-agent manualy > Author: tuibelgium > Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,23228,23249#msg-23249 > > When I run cf-agent -f failsafe.cf&& cf-agent, I can

solaris vs solarisx86

2011-08-29 Thread JIM AMANATIDIS, BLOOMBERG/ 731 LEXIN
Hello all, I just noticed that on solaris/intel systems, there is no "solaris" built-in hard/soft class. By definition, "solaris" is a unix operating system developed by Sun Microsystems and is not specific to either the sparc or the intel architecture. Given cfengine already has other bu

RE: CFEngine Help: Re: CFEngine Help: Version 3.2 will not bootstrap to policy server

2011-08-29 Thread Jerome Yanga
Has anyone gotten Cfengine Community version 3.2 to work via Cygwin on Windows 2008R2? Regards, j -Original Message- Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 4:23 PM To: 'help-cfengine@cfengine.org' Subject: RE: CFEngine Help: Re: CFEngine Help: Version 3.2 will not bootstrap to policy server G

Re: CFEngine Help: Re: CFEngine Help: Version 3.2 will not bootstrap to policy server

2011-08-29 Thread Aleksey Tsalolikhin
I haven't tried... Just acknowledging your query. I don't understand why you need Cygwin, doesn't it run on Windows natively? (I only run CFEngine on Linux in production today, though I used to run it on HP-UX as well.) Aleksey On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Jerome Yanga wrote: > Has anyone

RE: CFEngine Help: Re: CFEngine Help: Version 3.2 will not bootstrap to policy server

2011-08-29 Thread Jerome Yanga
Aleksey, I am concerned that you are the second person that told me that there is a Cfengine Community version 3.2 that runs natively on Windows. The reason for this concern is due to the fact I cannot find a Cfengine Community version 3.2 download for Windows that provides an MSI file. If th

Re: CFEngine Help: Re: CFEngine Help: Version 3.2 will not bootstrap to policy server

2011-08-29 Thread Aleksey Tsalolikhin
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Jerome Yanga wrote: > > FYI, section 2.1 Installation from > https://cfengine.com/manuals/cf3-tutorial.html seems to mention the line > below. > > "On Windows machines, you need to install the basic Cygwin DLL from > http://www.cygwin.com in order to run CFEngin

Is it safe to bump up editfilesize? How high?

2011-08-29 Thread Aleksey Tsalolikhin
I just tried to use CFEngine to edit /etc/services and it refused: !! File /etc/services is bigger than the limit edit.max_file_size = 362149 > 10 bytes File /etc/services was marked for editing but could not be opened I found the file size is configurable -- is there anything to watch out f

Re: Is it safe to bump up editfilesize? How high?

2011-08-29 Thread Aleksey Tsalolikhin
Found this under max_file_size: A local, per-file sanity check to make sure the file editing is sensible. If this is set to zero, the check is disabled and any size may be edited. The default value of max_file_size is determined by the global control body setting, See editfilesize in agent, whose

Re: Is it safe to bump up editfilesize? How high?

2011-08-29 Thread Paul Krizak
Well since cfengine edits the file in memory and then does a comparison to the on-disk version before making commits, presumably you should be careful to not edit any files larger than the free memory on your system. Paul Krizak 7171 Southwest Pkwy MS B200.3A MTS Systems

Re: Is it safe to bump up editfilesize? How high?

2011-08-29 Thread Aleksey Tsalolikhin
Thanks, Paul. And somebody's pointed out to me that the allowed input range is 0,999 (93 Gb). Thanks!! :) Aleksey On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Paul Krizak wrote: > Well since cfengine edits the file in memory and then does a comparison > to the on-disk version before making commi

Re: Is it safe to bump up editfilesize? How high?

2011-08-29 Thread Mark Burgess
As big as your memory allows. BUT, this is meant as a safety feature. Most of the time it only makes sense to edit relatively small files. If you picked up a huge file like a binary by mistake, you might do some damage. So think of this as an "are you sure?" dialogue On 08/30/2011 03:16 AM, Ale