Cfengine Help: Re: Cfengine Help: Re: Once more unto the code bridge: repository

2010-12-17 Thread no-reply
Forum: Cfengine Help Subject: Re: Cfengine Help: Re: Once more unto the code bridge: repository Author: bbomgardner Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19824,19829#msg-19829 Thats good, Jesse. Let us know if you hear from him. I don't know if we need to have a consensus

Re: Cfengine Help: Re: Once more unto the code bridge: repository

2010-12-16 Thread Jesse Becker
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 03:43:16PM -0500, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote: >On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:08 PM, wrote: >> Forum: Cfengine Help >> Subject: Re: Once more unto the code bridge: repository >> Author: bbomgardner >> Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19721,19772#msg-19772 >>

Re: Cfengine Help: Re: Once more unto the code bridge: repository

2010-12-16 Thread Aleksey Tsalolikhin
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:08 PM, wrote: > Forum: Cfengine Help > Subject: Re: Once more unto the code bridge: repository > Author: bbomgardner > Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19721,19772#msg-19772 > > Another related issue: > > When researching cfengine this summer I had so

Re: Cfengine Help: Re: Once more unto the code bridge: repository

2010-12-15 Thread Jesse Becker
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:24:55PM -0500, Deb Heller wrote: >Since we use SVN and ViewVC extensively, I like that you're moving in >this direction. Documentation is always the most difficult thing to get >right. Have you already considered a Wiki of some kind? > >I'll have to look at websvn...

Re: Cfengine Help: Re: Once more unto the code bridge: repository

2010-12-15 Thread Jesse Becker
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:31:19PM -0500, Deb Heller wrote: >We've used Twiki software here for about 4yrs or more. None of really >likes it - it's been limiting in configuration, where MediaWiki has the >sky as the limit - but harder to maintain over the long haul... than a >Twiki. > >As a use

Re: Cfengine Help: Re: Once more unto the code bridge: repository

2010-12-15 Thread Jesse Becker
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 09:52:02AM -0500, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote: >Forum: Cfengine Help >Subject: Re: Once more unto the code bridge: repository >Author: mark >Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19721,19801#msg-19801 > >Is THAT why it's called git-hub? :-) In part, yes. :)

Re: Cfengine Help: Re: Once more unto the code bridge: repository

2010-12-14 Thread Deb Heller
We've used Twiki software here for about 4yrs or more. None of really likes it - it's been limiting in configuration, where MediaWiki has the sky as the limit - but harder to maintain over the long haul... than a Twiki. As a user of Twikis and Wikis, I'll take a MediaWiki over Twiki any day o

Re: Cfengine Help: Re: Once more unto the code bridge: repository

2010-12-14 Thread Deb Heller
Since we use SVN and ViewVC extensively, I like that you're moving in this direction. Documentation is always the most difficult thing to get right. Have you already considered a Wiki of some kind? I'll have to look at websvn... What did you like about it, Jesse? d On 12/13/10 4:00 AM, no-re

Re: Cfengine Help: Re: Once more unto the code bridge: repository

2010-12-14 Thread Mark Burgess
Thanks, Aleksey. We are all enriched by your helpful enthusiasm and positive attitude. And thanks to Carolyn for the summary so far (this is good Knowledge Management!). Some kind of picture seems to be emerging. M On 12/13/2010 11:23 PM, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote: > Thanks for the summary, Car

Re: Cfengine Help: Re: Once more unto the code bridge: repository

2010-12-13 Thread Aleksey Tsalolikhin
Thanks for the summary, Carolyn, and I am pleased to see this is a hot topic. =) Diego, could you please help me setup up a github wiki on the github.com cfengine site? I would like to comment on some of Mark's proposed requirements: 0. A flat, management free interface No comment. 1. Versi

Re: Cfengine Help: Re: Once more unto the code bridge: repository

2010-12-13 Thread Bas van der Vlies
I am a bit biased because i am using trac and there are a lot plugins for trac: * http://trac-hacks.org/ - vote plugin(s) - code review plugin - xmlrpc interface so you can use external scripts - ... I have read some pages and this also used for codereviews: * http://www.review

Re: Cfengine Help: Re: Once more unto the code bridge: repository

2010-12-13 Thread Carolyn Rowland
Community, So we have a list of suggestions to Mark. Some of these were "here's what I use" without much explanation: - github (https://github.com/cfengine - Aleksey's site) +github wikis (example: https://github.com/mojombo/jekyll/wiki) (does the addition of a wiki and gitpages negate

Re: Cfengine Help: Re: Once more unto the code bridge: repository

2010-12-13 Thread Jesse Becker
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:45:42AM -0500, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote: >Forum: Cfengine Help >Subject: Re: Once more unto the code bridge: repository >Author: mark >Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,19721,19759#msg-19759 > >Cfengine is all about Knowledge Management these days, w

Re: Cfengine Help: Re: Once more unto the code bridge: repository

2010-12-13 Thread Nicolas Charles
I also think it should be hosted on Cfengine web site. I like Git, but it may be a bit of an overkill for such project (no need for much branching I guess), so I'd be happy with SVN also Redmine has a ticketing system that integrates well with the comments from the commit (you have actions on ti

Re: Cfengine Help: Re: Once more unto the code bridge: repository

2010-12-13 Thread Michael Potter
I use Trac - it is a bit dated but it covers all bases: SVN viewer, Wiki and Ticketing, project planning (milestones etc) system all in one. The code viewer support most popular syntax highlighters, like pygments. It is python+mysql based, which may or may not be a drawback. It also has that distin