Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: Re: Warning: upcoming removal of Berkeley DB backend
Author: megamic
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,25234,25255#msg-25255
I just built d34d11 with gcc on Solaris10/SPARC, and everything seemed to
compile and link OK against TC 1.4.47.
I cleaned
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 2:47 PM, wrote:
> Before I open a feature request to add an additional "nice" process selection
> capability (most ps implementations do have a separate "nice" column), am I
> the only person who's ever wanted to make a promise as to the nice value of a
> process?
*rai
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:30:04 -0500 Nick Anderson wrote:
NA> On 03/13/2012 09:22 AM, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
>> Something like "git clean -fxd"?
NA> Something like that. When I do it with svn I like to track which files
NA> had which state so I can send a report to the person who cared about the
On 03/13/2012 09:22 AM, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> Something like "git clean -fxd"?
Something like that. When I do it with svn I like to track which files
had which state so I can send a report to the person who cared about the
content of the checkout. This file was out of date, this was an extra
fi
On 03/13/2012 03:19 PM, Nick Anderson wrote:
> Yeah I just haven't gotten around to parsing the git status output to
> get back to clean clone state.
Something like "git clean -fxd"?
--
Mikhail Gusarov
___
Help-cfengine mailing list
Help-cfengine@cfe
On 03/13/2012 09:10 AM, Ted Zlatanov wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:43:52 -0500 Nick Anderson wrote:
>
> NA> I'm kind of surprised that rsync is so much faster than svn update. But
> NA> I haven't tried to use subversion to distribute lots of files, only used
> NA> for small trees. But i seem t
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:43:52 -0500 Nick Anderson wrote:
NA> I'm kind of surprised that rsync is so much faster than svn update. But
NA> I haven't tried to use subversion to distribute lots of files, only used
NA> for small trees. But i seem to use subversion for distributing small
NA> trees a lo
On 03/13/2012 04:08 AM, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote:
> If bug #961 can be resolved, then this issue may go away.
I had a look again, and the issue is already fixed in trunk.
--
Mikhail Gusarov
___
Help-cfengine mailing list
Help-cfengine@cfengine.org
Forum: CFEngine Help
Subject: nfs mount strange behaviour in aix
Author: skel84
Link to topic: https://cfengine.com/forum/read.php?3,25247,25247#msg-25247
Hi everyone,
i'm experiencing a strange beahviour of the cf-agent while mounting an nfs
filesystem on a client.
If i unmount the fs and then
On 03/13/2012 10:38 AM, Erik Mouw wrote:
> I have used CFengine in legacy environments (RHEL 3, Solaris 8, HP/UX 11)
> where it was close to impossible to get CFengine compiled with TokyoCabinet
> (i.e.: I gave up after three hours), and only the vendor supplied Berkeley DB
> resulted in a success
On Mar 12, 2012, at 16:46, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> If there is a serious technical problem with getting QDBM or
> TokyoCabinet in your environment, please let me know -- we might retain
> BDB backend (in completely unsupported state) until 3.4.0, but even that
> would require a significant amou
On 03/12/2012 09:33 PM, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote:
> - Is there a reasonable way to port existing information from the BDB
> databases to the new Tokyo Cabinet databases? Presuming no change in the
> actual data being stored, the "learn what's normal on the server" data would
> be handy to
On 03/13/2012 04:08 AM, no-re...@cfengine.com wrote:
Thanks for testing!
> If bug #961 can be resolved, then this issue may go away.
Don't worry about this problem -- there will be a fix for Solaris build
soon.
--
Mikhail Gusarov
___
Help-cfengine
13 matches
Mail list logo
