On 08/16/2009 02:22 PM, April White wrote:
I've been mostly focusing on the doc/en-en files but I was curious
about Clipper versions (that is for another email).
I observed that there are several places within doc/*.txt where the
term Clipper is used and CA-Cl*pper is others.
Is it an accept
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 01:02 +0200, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> There is a pending item on my TODO list to move
> hbzlib and hbpcre sources under /external tree.
>
> At the same time the detection of externally available
> versions could also be added, and possibility to override
> them wi
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 18:23 +0200, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
> Yes, with real FS it's okay with our APIs, but
> such date/time/random based solution aren't rock
> solid (uniqueness isn't guaranteed), so indeed
> something better would be good.
pseudocode
do
RandomFileName = SomeRandomFileNameCrea
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 21:16 +0200, Vojtěch Obrdlík wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've found that on Phil Barnett's marvelous old Clipper (TM) site - The
> Oasis -
>
> is available patch Clipper 5.2e for both US and Intl. version.
>
> url: http://www.the-oasis.net/ftpmaster.php3?content=ftp_ca.htm
You all c
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 14:19 -0200, Angel Pais wrote:
> Maybe here we are having language barriers difficulting communication,
> but in the experimental HMG 3.0, Roberto have icluded hbmk2 and is using
> it.
> He is running some tests to report here later the things he finds.
> Roberto has issued
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 09:20 +0800, Jerry Finuliar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to search through the mailing list archives? (of course except
> from downloading it)
>
> Sorry for asking this silly question.
>
> Thanks,
> Jerry
>
>
>
Put this in the search field of Google.com
site:http:
On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 23:07 +0100, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm glad to announce that after a very heavy 16 months
> of development, the final, stable version 2.0.0 is finally
> released.
Congratulations!
You have worked long and hard for this and it's so good to see it
accomplished
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
>
> In fact the overall goal is the opposite: Allow developers
> to create addons completely independently from Harbour
> code, yet make them easily manageable and pluggable
> for users. That's what I'd like to encourage 3rd party
> developers
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
>
> HOW TO GET
> --
> From SVN:
> svn export
> https://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/harbour-project/tags/harbour-2.0.0
>
After a successful compile and install on Fedora 12 64 bit, I found that I
had to add a conf
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Phil Barnett wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
>
>>
>> HOW TO GET
>> --
>> From SVN:
>> svn export
>> https://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/harbour-proj
On Thu, 2009-12-24 at 11:41 +0100, Przemysław Czerpak wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009, Phil Barnett wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > After a successful compile and install on Fedora 12 64 bit, I found that I
> > had to add a conf file to /etc/ld.so.conf.d
> > echo "/usr/local
On Thu, 2009-12-24 at 15:47 +0100, Przemysław Czerpak wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to wish all of you Mary Christmas !!!
Thank you and a very merry Christmas to you and your family and all
Harbour participants!
___
Harbour mailing list (attachment
On Sat, 2010-01-02 at 02:36 +0100, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
> So until we clear this up, I won't add any new replicator
> services.
>
> We already have:
> - Our own mailman archives (matrixlist),
> - gmane.org
> - mail-archive.com
> - nabble.com
>
> All of them indexed by google.
>
> + Since
On Sat, 2010-01-02 at 03:07 +0100, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
> > Is possible found on line Historical messages 1999-2007?
>
> We've been hopping mailing list providers in the beginning
> (mostly because of host company takeovers and mergers), so
> the early days are only available from local/offline
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
Hi all,
What is the difference between GPL + Harbour exception and LGPL?
I reckon LGPL wasn't nearly available when Harbour was born, so we
had to come up with our own solution, but since now LGPL is around,
shouldn't we consider switching our unique license to this stan
Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Phil Barnett wrote:
Hi Phil,
The reason for the Harbour exception was so that we could include the macro
compiler inside distributed executables without violating the GPL.
Can you explain it?
The macro compiler code is on exactly the
Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Phil Barnett wrote:
Hi Phil,
The reason for the Harbour exception was so that we could include the
macro compiler inside distributed executables without violating the GPL.
Can you explain it?
The macro compiler code is on exactly the
Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Phil Barnett wrote:
Hi,
LGPL only protects from GPL for dynamically linked code. If you staticly
link LGPL, it becomes GPL and has the problem mentioned before.
We spent months working out the license. I have the archives if we need to
study
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
There are a few issue with Harbour 3rd party libs in general
(talking about open source ones for now):
1) Each has a different make system, which means each of them has
to be learned, built and locally maintained in a completely
different way.
2) These make systems and
dru...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Revision: 10669
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=10669&view=rev
Author: druzus
Date: 2009-03-21 15:04:43 + (Sat, 21 Mar 2009)
Outstanding work! Thanks so much for this great contribution!
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
It's nothing against your person or your work, I just feel
this contribution would have a much better life as a separate
entity due its size, focuses, and other misc properties I've
repeated already too many times.
We should focus here on multiplatform things.
There has
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
If the license doesn't change anything, we probably shouldn't have one at
all, so I hope we agree that it's there to use it :) no offence meant.
Brgds,
Viktor
Well, the license DOES mean something. The GPL requires that copyrights
are carried forward into the borrowed c
Andi Jahja wrote:
This is unfair IMO, you seem to hide under the condition "IDEA CANNOT BE
COPYRIGHTED" or are you declaring yourself a genius because you can
"implement" other's stuff into yours without taking a look and then
simply stated that it is a SIMPLE thing? :-)
I am not trying to be ru
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
Hi Phil and All,
I'm planning to add this (or similar) text to the top of our ChangeLog
file:
---
/* Copyright notice:
All text in this file holds the copyright of respective authors seen in
the entry headers if not indicated otherwise. Copying or other forms of
Szakáts Viktor wrote:
Hi Phil,
/* Copyright notice:
All text in this file holds the copyright of respective authors
seen in
the entry headers if not indicated otherwise. Copying or other
forms of
usage is only permitted while giving credit to author including
his/her
full name, plus
.
Brgds,
Viktor
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 1:40 AM, Phil Barnett wrote:
Szakáts Viktor wrote:
Hi Phil,
/* Copyright notice:
All text in this file holds the copyright of respective authors seen in
the entry headers if not indicated otherwise. Copying or other forms of
usage is only permitted wh
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
Hi Phil,
You write about code, while my intent isn't to change any code
license at all. My intent is to *add* license for non-code, particularly
my non-code parts and future additions, these parts didn't have any
license so far. Having two licenses is no problem at all,
Ok, I have the mailing list slowness fixed and the speed should be back
to normal.
There was a mail directory on the machine with nearly 500k messages
(spam that was supposed to be only redirected to the trash bin) and the
machine was struggling with that. I cleared it out and set up a cron jo
Massimo Belgrano wrote:
Can be evalutated moving mailing to google or yhaoo group?
it can be accessible hrough the web interface, or by e-mail.
it have better attachment management
For example for gogole group you can visit Discuss developing
Android applications using the Android framework
Vailton Renato wrote:
Yesterday and today I was missing and therefore could not respond, but
it is at least 3 days that I have all the changes the site ready and I
can not update the site!
I do not know if there is any relation with the problem of e-mail
list, but the FTP is not even asking for
Alex Strickland wrote:
Szakáts Viktor wrote:
Not just a habit, Harbour (and of course hbmk2) also supports
DOS, and potentially other such limited OSes/filesystems where
LFN isn't available. So in Harbour core we stick to 8.3 names.
Perhaps it is time to drop support for those limits. I canno
Vailton Renato wrote:
Updated the main page of the project with a link into the right side
and also in the news section. Here in Brazil I made the call in many
programming forums for all support our project in the voting link on
our page.
I would like take this opportunity to comment on some ide
Alexander S.Kresin wrote:
Paul,
Hi Alexander and All,
I ported Click to Harbour for use on Linux. The code is untested on
Windows but may compile and run. Added "Calls to" information in
function headers and made stand alone executable. Need to update
code in few days but current source
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
Hi All,
Is there anything against going rc1?
I also like to propose to change our version number,
as we've definitely done more that 0.1 is worth, also
xhb is now at 1.2, while feature-wise we're ahead.
Any opinions on these?
1.) 1.1.0rc1 (next logical)
2.) 1.2.0rc1 (cur
On 06/10/2009 09:45 AM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
I don't think Harbour issues are unwelcome on the xHarbour group,
but it may confuse people.
I think the ideal would be able to count on a structure itself, so we
can concentrate on our project without having to give support or get
information about
On 06/11/2009 09:42 AM, Vailton Renato wrote:
In my opinion it is tiring, that you should be looking at various
places to see if already exists an answer to your question and I
believe that having a language by default, will be easier for all...
This would be an incentive for all to make efforts
On 06/12/2009 11:25 AM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
AFAIK it is also possible to install phpBB under the:
http://harbour-project.sf.net/forum/
link (or anywhere inside our sf.net hp), but in this
case we must do the installation and maintenance.
Or we can install directly into http://www.harbour-proj
On 06/14/2009 03:24 AM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
We also have the "missing name" problem with our existing mailing list
archive. It has been reported her a few times as a problem, but you
didn't answer to these, maybe you missed it, or is this feature intentional?
It makes very strange to look at me
On 06/14/2009 03:52 AM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
We have it on our website since at least 1 year. The list is sadly
looking anonymous, and very few developers are lurking there.
I'm looking at our main page and I see no information about our mailing
list for users. Can you tell me where it is h
On 06/14/2009 02:02 PM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
But, please tell me, is it intentional that all sender names
are the same ("harbour-users at harbour-project.org") ?:
---
Starting: Thu May 21 17:43:03 EDT 2009
Ending: Thu May 28 21:33:47 EDT 2009
Messages: 16
• [Harbour-users] OS Language ha
On 06/14/2009 07:19 PM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
As you can see, the dev list has proper names of sender,
while the user list is completely blind and sender is
always the same generic address. IOW, the archive page
of users list cannot easily be used in practice to lookup
information.
Got it.
I t
On 06/15/2009 12:52 PM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
but hbhttpd looks a bit strange, or I don't know
Actually, I like that.
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
On 06/16/2009 07:40 PM, Bruno Luciani wrote:
anybody see this
http://www.harbour-project.com/
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.or
On 06/22/2009 03:34 AM, Patrick Mast wrote:
Hannes Ziegler is the one who wrote xHDN's documentation (
http://www.xHarbour.com/xHDN ) for xHarbour.com. So, yes, you are
correct, he is a very good technical writer! Actually one of the best
in the field!
Now, I was thinking.. why reinvent the w
On 06/24/2009 01:34 PM, Patrick Mast wrote:
Hello Phil,
That depends on how much you paid him. What was the figure?
Hannes started writing xHarbour doc's in November 2005 and finished
them April 2007. We paid him USD $38,800.00 for this job.
A healthy sum. I'm going to defer to
On 06/25/2009 08:33 PM, dru...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Revision: 11528
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11528&view=rev
Author: druzus
Date: 2009-06-26 00:33:38 + (Fri, 26 Jun 2009)
Simply amazing! You are brilliant.
__
On 06/26/2009 05:12 PM, Bruno Luciani wrote:
I like to know who is the list moderator
I am, Bruno.
And I already explained to you that there is a file size limit on this
email list.
You have several choices.
1. Paraphrase your problem and post a portion of the log.
2. Put the file on a we
On 06/30/2009 04:04 AM, Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
Besides the packaging (.deb/.rpm/.tgz), I also wonder why
we need to create one for every distro.
And could we possibly do anything to make Harbour
"distro-independent".
We cannot due to diff
On 07/07/2009 11:25 AM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
Hi All,
I'd like inform everyone, that I've added Przemek as Project Admin.
Pls be welcome now in this role.
At the same time I've removed David G Holm from this role,
as he's no longer participating according to his page:
http://harbour.netfang.net
On 07/22/2009 05:36 AM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
First of all, sorry to hear you can't take the role anymore,
but I'm sure you have good reason.
Here's the deal. When I took the role, I made a rule for myself that I
would be the leader, but I would only dwell on leading, not on coding.
Then, at w
On 07/22/2009 06:58 PM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
Phil I would like to thank you very much for all your work and
always very import for me judgement voice. I hope the at least in
the most important for the future of this project decisions we can
count on your intellect. Without you we have never reac
On Saturday 09 August 2008 07:26:11 am Massimo Belgrano wrote:
> There is same interesting information about (x)harbour in this web site
>
> : http://geocities.yahoo.com.br/angeiras/
>
> Is present also a documentation of gtwvw ( mix traditional SAY/GET with
> HUI elements for an easy and fast migr
On Sunday 10 August 2008 01:07:44 pm Massimo Belgrano wrote:
> Can i update Harbour web site?
> http://www.harbour-project.org/
Looks like a good update for this page:
http://www.harbour-project.org/links.htm
--
Waiting for sunspots.
___
Harbour maili
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: SourceForge.net Project Web/Shell/Database Migration on 2008-08-18
Date: Wednesday 06 August 2008
From: "SourceForge.net Team"
Greetings,
The date for the migration of the project web, database and shell services
to the new Chicago data center
On Wednesday 13 August 2008 10:45:24 am Szakáts Viktor wrote:
> - We're done.
Wow! What a project! I'm so happy to see this day come.
Over 8 years ago, a group of volunteers from the usenet newsgroup
comp.lang.clipper formed a dream and opened this mailing list on September
16, 2000. We had a
On Wednesday 13 August 2008 01:06:03 pm Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
> And I would like to ask someone who can update Harbour home page
> to add me to developers list. I was not with you when the project
> started but in last years I created a lot of core code which is
> now heart of Harbour.
> As I
On Thursday 14 August 2008 06:01:46 pm Pritpal Bedi wrote:
> Hello Everybody
>
> Here is a compiled overview of feature set for next
> version(s) not in a specifc order, though I have tried to
> put these in order of relevance with present times.
>
> [ Przemek's Descriptives in List Form + Few Addu
On Friday 22 August 2008 04:05:44 pm Randy Portnoff wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Will a Harbour app build using VS 2005 still run on older versions of
> Windows (eg. 98, Me, 2000 and 2003)?
It will require the same version of the .net framework that you compile
against. I believe by default that would be
On Saturday 23 August 2008 02:13:55 am Phil Barnett wrote:
> On Friday 22 August 2008 04:05:44 pm Randy Portnoff wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Will a Harbour app build using VS 2005 still run on older versions of
> > Windows (eg. 98, Me, 2000 and 2003)?
>
> It wil
On Wednesday 27 August 2008 10:05:01 am Massimo Belgrano wrote:
> I propose rewritring from scratch web site, Removing from new structure
> Sample app,Documentation,sample apps Redefined simple menu
> Download/Community/News/Harbour word
>
> Is can use as model:
> http://www.web20generator.com/gene
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: SourceForge.net Subversion service downtime scheduled 2008-09-04
Date: Tuesday 02 September 2008
"SourceForge.net Team"
On 2008-09-04 at 04:00 UTC, Subversion service write operations will be
offline for no more than 24 hours. During this time
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 03:58:50 am ABIX - Adam Jurkiewicz wrote:
> Maybe we can use it to create new Harbour
> Home Page?
No CMS. Static Pages.
People using CMS's on web sites are making it easy for the bad guys to hijack
and proliferate spam and illegal software. I'm not going to partic
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 05:10:10 am Massimo Belgrano wrote:
> We need also a cms lite multiplatform and who not require database
>
> Please post any Suggestion
As the project manager, I must insist... Static pages only. NO CMS. No dynamic
pages. You cannot guarantee that the CMS or CGI or
On Thursday 11 September 2008 03:47:23 am Massimo Belgrano wrote:
> Your aproach seem very old
It's very secure. There are huge numbers of static web sites on the internet
for this very reason. Slashdot.net. Woot.com. NewYorkTimes.com All static.
Thousands of big sites are static.
> We can ho
On Friday 12 September 2008 04:37:26 am Szakáts Viktor wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Thanks for your great work on the server. I fully agree
> with all your concerns. Not to say that a dynamic site
> is an absolute no go in general, but only if properly
> justified, which - for Harbour - it is simply not.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: SourceForge.net Service Operations bulletin 2008-09-12
Date: Friday 12 September 2008
From: "SourceForge.net Team"
This message is being sent by SourceForge.net to all administrators of
SourceForge.net-hosted projects.
Questions or concerns reg
On Friday 12 September 2008 10:01:20 pm Vailton Renato wrote:
> Absolutely! I need to be sent to me the correct texts to update the site.
> What is the best way to do this?
I will change the password and send you the access directions.
Then you can use the NVU editor to fetch the current site, m
On Friday 12 September 2008 02:12:46 pm Lorenzo Fiorini wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Szakáts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Great, I surely am. Probably not alone, even.
>
> I'm not an English native speaker so I'll be very "schematic".
> I hope this will not sounds rude or off
On Wednesday 01 October 2008 10:52:03 am Lorenzo Fiorini wrote:
> 3) I'd like to have a switch that warns me if I've used "=" where is
> "ambiguos".
My Click! source code reformattor does this conversion for you in many cases.
--
"Ninety percent of politicians give the other 10 percent a bad nam
On Thursday 02 October 2008 09:57:48 am Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Oct 2008, Phil Barnett wrote:
>
> Hi Phil,
>
> > > 3) I'd like to have a switch that warns me if I've used "=" where is
> > > "ambiguos".
> >
> >
On Sunday 05 October 2008 07:27:32 am Enrico Maria Giordano wrote:
> It's already better now.
I didn't do anything.
You can see it's load and traffic performance graphs here:
http://www.linuxceptional.com/mrgt/
Doesn't look like anything exceptional was happening.
--
"Ninety percent of polit
On Sunday 05 October 2008 12:59:12 pm Szakáts Viktor wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> May I suggest shutting down anonymous FTP uploads
> on our FTP?
>
> Actually the best would be to turn off FTP for our
> site completely. We're not using it, but internet
> users do, as used to find adult content in the 'inc
On Saturday 04 October 2008 10:44:09 pm Vailton Renato wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I am working in recent days in layout and in some texts to the site of
> the project. I'm running with it to finish it as soon as possible.
>
> As I have difficulty with English, any help or suggestions will be welcome.
>
>
On Sunday 05 October 2008 09:34:01 pm Szakáts Viktor wrote:
> I don't feel like dealing with this problem on the daily
> maintenance level, just thought to mention it, maybe it can
> be fixed once and for all. We've also got site infection due
> to sniffed FTP passwords, so FTP is by no means safe.
On Sunday 05 October 2008 09:34:01 pm Szakáts Viktor wrote:
> BTW, daily snapshots are still very old. I'd think it'd be
> better to remove the links from the homepage, as it makes it
> look like Harbour development had stalled.
Ok, I was not checking the right thing. What is running and working
On Sunday 05 October 2008 10:16:07 pm Szakáts Viktor wrote:
> For the daily snapshots:
> svn export
> http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/harbour-project/trunk/ha
>rbour [ this will put the result in a 'harbour' subfolder. https also works
> BTW. ]
Ok, that's what I was already usi
On Sunday 05 October 2008 10:32:22 pm Szakáts Viktor wrote:
> 'co' will create a full local development sandbox (updatable,
> committable), this means it will create all the SVN administration
> files (in hidden '.svn' subdirs in each dir), and all this will
> significantly grow the size of such lo
On Sunday 05 October 2008 10:16:07 pm Szakáts Viktor wrote:
> For the daily snapshots:
> svn export
> http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/harbour-project/trunk/ha
>rbour [ this will put the result in a 'harbour' subfolder. https also works
> BTW. ]
>
> For SVN backups:
> rsync -av ha
On Sunday 05 October 2008 11:18:47 pm Szakáts Viktor wrote:
> Great, many thanks.
>
> Just one last comment; so far the daily snapshots were called 'harbour-
> svn.tgz'
> and 'harbour-svn.zip' (these are linked from the homepage), .bz2 as an
> option
> is nice, but IMO we should keep .tgz and .zip
On Monday 06 October 2008 04:46:50 am Szakáts Viktor wrote:
> Here is a small patch to avoid the internal
> 'co' directory in the source archives:
I had to do a little more than that because the compressed files landed in the
right directory, but it's essentially fixed to not have the co/ directo
On Monday 06 October 2008 04:59:18 am Szakáts Viktor wrote:
> You can create the most generic binary build by
> going into 'harbour' dir of the nightly source,
> and running './make_tgz.sh'. The result will be
> a .tgz file in that 'harbour' dir. The exact .tgz
> name depends on the system, but thi
On Monday 06 October 2008 04:59:18 am Szakáts Viktor wrote:
> You can create the most generic binary build by
> going into 'harbour' dir of the nightly source,
> and running './make_tgz.sh'. The result will be
> a .tgz file in that 'harbour' dir. The exact .tgz
> name depends on the system, but thi
On Monday 06 October 2008 09:23:52 pm Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Oct 2008, Pritpal Bedi wrote:
>
> Hi Pritpal,
>
> > Here are attached the results on 2 computers with different
> > number of processors and operating systems.
> > And below are attached those log files.
>
> Thank you ver
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 06:28:18 am Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
> with -gc3 switch, f.e.:
> hbmk -n -w -es2 -gc3 -mt speedtst
> for i in 1 2 4 6 8; do ./speedtst --exclude=mem --scale --thread:$i;
> done
Here it is with -gc3. The recompile will have to wait until after I get home
from wor
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 06:28:18 am Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
> rebuild Harbour with C_USR=-DHB_GUI
Didn't think it would get done, but here is the same test after the recompile.
I'll do it once more without the -gc3 in a minute. Don't know if it will get
done before I leave for work.
[EMAIL
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 06:28:18 am Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
> To disable it you will have to rebuild Harbour with C_USR=-DHB_GUI
> or at least compile this tests with -gc3 - it causes that except codeblocks
> for the rest of code C code is generated not PCODE evaluated by main HVM
> loop. I wo
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 10:38:55 am Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
> I think that it was a mistake in build process. F.e. you created RPMs
> where C_USR is overload or you haven't used 'install' parameter so speedtst
> was linked with old HVM library.
> If -gc3 helps then recompiling Harbour with -DH
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 01:32:42 pm Alejandro de Garate wrote:
> Hi folks
> I stand up from bed to send a few (important) mails and to tell some
> hurried people they will have to wait.
>
> I am with fever and neumonitis, when I will stay better I will continue
> with the work.
Please, stay in
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 08:45:51 pm Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
> > I saw the environment parameter included in all of the gcc compile
> > strings, so I think that -DHB_GUI was compiled into the compiler. Then I
> > ran mpkg_tgz.sh and installed it again over the old output. Then I
> > recompiled
On Wednesday 08 October 2008 05:10:19 am Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
> OK. If possible please try current SVN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] harbour]$ export C_USR=-DHB_GUI
[EMAIL PROTECTED] harbour]$ mpkg_tgz.sh
install resulting tarball as root
[EMAIL PROTECTED] harbour]$ cd tests
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tests]
On Wednesday 08 October 2008 10:43:12 am Teo Fonrouge wrote:
> I see that you are use a rpm based distro (Fedora 9) so you can build the
> binaries and install it as rpm's. To create the Harbour rpm's, you just
> need to send the following command in an console:
>
> $ ./mpkg_rpm.sh
[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Thursday 09 October 2008 06:13:54 am Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
> Maybe you build and install Harbour correctly but just simply you have
> some other copy Harbour binaries which is used and it's the reason why
> adding HB_GUI was not working for you. I really do not know.
I figured it out. I su'
On Sunday 12 October 2008 06:48:57 am Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
> Windows uses DOS error codes counted from 0 and significant
> are only 2 low bytes. AFAIR upper bytes are usd in some subsystems
> as bitfields.
Yes on significant 2 low bytes.
Not true on starting at 0. You can return negative er
On Wednesday 22 October 2008 11:42:43 am [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hotmail stinks.
Banished. No longer a member of this list as of now.
--
"Ninety percent of politicians give the other 10 percent a bad name." -- Henry
Kissinger
___
Harbour mailing l
On Thursday 23 October 2008 01:17:33 pm Vailton Renato wrote:
> http://harbour-project.org/preview2/index.html
This really looks very nice. Thank you for all the hard work.
The old site is so much out of date, I believe we can switch over to this
format any time you like and we will fill in the
On Friday 24 October 2008 03:03:09 am Horodyski Marek (PZUZ) wrote:
> And what you tell about Phil's PBMake ?
> http://www.the-oasis.net/
It probably needs to be revisited and brought up to date.
It's open source. The source is there on The Oasis. I just don't have time to
take on more stuff. (I
On Friday 24 October 2008 04:12:50 am Massimo Belgrano wrote:
> Good but not open source
All you have to do is ask.
I have no problem releasing it under GPL.
--
"Ninety percent of politicians give the other 10 percent a bad name." -- Henry
Kissinger
___
Microsoft announced that they found and patched a VERY nasty rpc bug which
allows attackers full control. If you have not done it already, please take
the time to patch your Windows boxes up to the latest level.
Linux users may take the day off and go fishing.
--
"Ninety percent of politicians
On Friday 24 October 2008 07:39:37 pm Phil Barnett wrote:
> On Friday 24 October 2008 04:12:50 am Massimo Belgrano wrote:
> > Good but not open source
>
> All you have to do is ask.
>
> I have no problem releasing it under GPL.
I just checked and Click! does have the GPL 2
On Monday 27 October 2008 08:26:12 am Vailton Renato wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I am of opinions on the page DOCUMENTATION > SAMPLES of the new site.
> I need to know if I'm on the right track and if all agree that the
> layout'm riding, because it is very difficult and full of details - if
> you have to
1 - 100 of 217 matches
Mail list logo
