On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 14:19 -0200, Angel Pais wrote: > Maybe here we are having language barriers difficulting communication, > but in the experimental HMG 3.0, Roberto have icluded hbmk2 and is using > it. > He is running some tests to report here later the things he finds. > Roberto has issued 3 versions of HMG in 2 days for his community to test > and report back compatibility issues. He is making a big effort to > include all tools from latest Harbour. > Go download it from sourceforge an see for yourself. > The reason Robertos is including mingw and harbour in the binary package > is for practical purpouses and to minimize support to only "stable" > versions of all tools involved.
Wouldn't this be better served by creating a script that fetches a stable version of each product and prividing a place where they can be downloaded from? It keeps you from having to customize yet allows you to have a fixed point to work around. Then, you can update portions of it as needed. This is always better served when there are stable versions being distributed, which is currently the 1.x version of Harbour. And when 2.x is released, you once again have a stable version to work with. With that in mind, would a better solution be to move quickly as possible to a stable 2.0 Harbour release? This would be good for all parties involved. Grabbing an unstable version of Harbour to make some other process stable is very work intensive and counterproductive in the long run. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
