Hi Vailton,
Looks impressive, great demo.
Can't entirely oversee the consequences of Adobe FLEX,
looks a bit risky path to me (knowing the company), and
it also has Flash, which may be a turn down for some
usages. Nevertheless it may be the choice for some users,
and it's very good to know such
On 06/15/2009 12:52 PM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
but hbhttpd looks a bit strange, or I don't know
Actually, I like that.
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
Probably a local variable container array could solve that,
so only one quasi-object needs to be passed around.
Variables are post, get, session, server, etc. I do not think I like
to
use a single on variable and write: variable["get"]["value"] or
variable[2]["value"]. Or I've misunderstood y
Hi,
Probably a local variable container array could solve that,
so only one quasi-object needs to be passed around.
Variables are post, get, session, server, etc. I do not think I like to
use a single on variable and write: variable["get"]["value"] or
variable[2]["value"]. Or I've misundersto
For me anything is good, just let's settle on something.
httpsrv is a bit generic indeed, although since there is
no other generic http server inside Harbour, it can be good,
I just miss the 'hb' from it to show the world it's running
on Harbour (but hbhttpd looks a bit strange, or I don't know).
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
>> Maybe HttpSrv ?
>
> This is good. I'll do the rename.
Isn't it too much generic?
If it is an evolution of uhttp why not uhttp1 and uhttp2?
best regards,
Lorenzo
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour
http2hb
2009/6/15 Francesco Saverio Giudice :
> Hi Viktor,
>
> Il 15/06/2009 18.00, Viktor Szakáts ha scritto:
>>
>> Well, maybe simply uhttpd1 and uhttpd2?
>>
>> Opininons?
>
> Maybe HttpSrv ?
>
>>
>>> I think it's a very valuable addition, so in no
>>> case would I want to remove it.
>>>
>
> Tha
>> Well, maybe simply uhttpd1 and uhttpd2?
>>
>> Opininons?
>
> Maybe HttpSrv ?
This is good. I'll do the rename.
Brgds,
Viktor
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
Hi Viktor,
Il 15/06/2009 18.00, Viktor Szakáts ha scritto:
Well, maybe simply uhttpd1 and uhttpd2?
Opininons?
Maybe HttpSrv ?
I think it's a very valuable addition, so in no
case would I want to remove it.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Francesco
___
Well, maybe simply uhttpd1 and uhttpd2?
Opininons?
Brgds,
Viktor
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Viktor Szakáts wrote:
> Hi Francesco,
>
>>> All we need to find is a name, because we already
>>> have uhttpd, we can rename existing one, or rename
>>> your new one, but which and to what name?
>>
Hi all!
Based on the examples that Mindaugas has posted I studied the
integration of Harbor + uhttp2 with Adobe Flex. I'm happy with the
result and them can easily integrate. I'd like to share the results
with everyone here on the list.
I developed 3 basic examples that show how to integrate thes
Hi Francesco,
All we need to find is a name, because we already
have uhttpd, we can rename existing one, or rename
your new one, but which and to what name?
as Mindaugas proposed uhttpd name, surely he must mantain the name.
So it will be enough rename existing with another name (I don't have
Hi Viktor,
All we need to find is a name, because we already
have uhttpd, we can rename existing one, or rename
your new one, but which and to what name?
as Mindaugas proposed uhttpd name, surely he must mantain the name.
So it will be enough rename existing with another name (I don't have o
>-Original Message-
>From: Mindaugas Kavaliauskas [mailto:dbto...@dbtopas.lt]
>Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 2:47 PM
>To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
>Subject: [Harbour] Re: uhttpd v0.2
>
>Hi,
>
...
>Marek:
>> Do you think too about WebSerwice
I didn't inspect the code yet, but it would be nice
to be able to pass LOCAL vars (f.e. array/hash container
of values) down the path. To make it possible to avoid
memvars.
It is possible to pass all them as locals, but I've tried to avoid
passing of 4 or 5 parameters though a few function in
Hi,
I left uhttpd demo server running for weekend. It was working OK for 24
hours until 13/Jun/2009 18:37:04 (the time of last query). It seems,
that all 50 thread (maximum number of threads) are blocked in some
operation like port read. I do not know the exact bug yet. I'll try to
find it A
16 matches
Mail list logo
