Well, maybe simply uhttpd1 and uhttpd2? Opininons?
Brgds, Viktor On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Viktor Szakáts<harbour...@syenar.hu> wrote: > Hi Francesco, > >>> All we need to find is a name, because we already >>> have uhttpd, we can rename existing one, or rename >>> your new one, but which and to what name? >> >> as Mindaugas proposed uhttpd name, surely he must mantain the name. >> So it will be enough rename existing with another name (I don't have one >> now), or, if anyone else is not interested apart me, please remove it from >> SVN. > > I think it's a very valuable addition, so in no > case would I want to remove it. > > But what name to give? Any suggestions from anyone? > > Brgds, > Viktor > > _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
